Case law

Worley v. Moore

2017 NCBC 15 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 28, 2017

Brown, Adams, Baker, Kerr, and McCamant were members of the Board at the time of the Merger in February 2013. (FAC ¶ 21; Aff. David G. Brown ¶ 5 [hereinafter Brown Aff.]; Aff. … Id. at 761 n.19; Brown v.

North Carolina State Board of Health v. Commissioners of Louisburg

173 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 4, 1917

Pritchard v. Comrs., 126 N. C., pp. 908-913; Hopper v. Covington, 118 U. S., pp. 148-151; Equitable Assurance v. Brown, 213 U. S., 25 ; Graef v. Equitable Insurance, 160 N. Y., 119 ; Griffin v. R. … Ormond v. Ins. Co., 145 N. C., 142 . The presence of the Board of Health, therefore, even without the power to sue, does not prevent the efficient maintenance of the action.

Ginsberg v. Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina

217 N.C. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 2011

Crocker v. Roethling, 363 N.C. 140, 142 , 675 S.E.2d 625, 628 (2009) (quotations and citations omitted). … Lenzer v. Flaherty, 106 N.C. App. 496, 509 , 418 S.E.2d 276, 284 (1992) (citations omitted).

Bynum Ex Rel. Boette v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education

363 N.C. 580 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 27, 2009

682 S.E.2d 207 (2009) Antwan BYNUM, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Wayne BOETTE, and Anita Bynum v. The NASH-ROCKY MOUNT BOARD OF EDUCATION. No. 172P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 27, 2009. W.

White v. Hester

1 N.C. App. 410 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1968

Crosby v. Crosby, 1 N.C. App. 398 , 161 S.E. 2d 654 (filed this date). Nevertheless, we have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by plaintiffs and defendants and find no prejudicial error.

Porter v. . Durham

74 N.C. 767 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

Cited: Staton v. R. R. , 109 N.C. 341 ; Fleming v. R. R. , 115 N.C. 696 ; Mizzell v. McGowan , 120 N.C. 138 ; Porter v. Armstrong , 129 N.C. 102 ; Mullen v. Canal Co. , 130 N.C. 502 ; Davis v. … Smith , 141 N.C. 109 , 110 ; Clark v. Guano Co. , 144 N.C. 76 ; Greenwood v. R. R. , 144 N.C. 448 ; Briscoe v. Parker , 145 N.C. 17 ; Brown v. R. R. , 165 N.C. 395 , 396 ; Yowmans v.

Wiebenson v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System

138 N.C. App. 489 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 2000

Wiebenson v. Bd. Of Trustees, State Employees’ Ret. Sys., 123 N.C. App. 246, 250 , 472 S.E.2d 592, 595 (1996), aff’d on other grounds, Wiebenson v. Bd. Of Trustees, State Employees’ Ret. … Crowell Constructors, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Cobey, 342 N.C. 838, 844 , 467 S.E.2d 675, 679 (1996).

Ideal Brick Co. v. Gentry

191 N.C. 636 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1926

. — Hoke, J., in Board of Health v. Comrs., 173 N. C., 250 . … Brown v. Markland, 22 Ind. App., p. 655; Dixon v. Horne, 180 N. C., 585 ; Scheflow v. Pierce, 176 N. C., 91 .

Case v. . Ewbanks

194 N.C. 775 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1927

The building had been used for many years as a hotel or boarding house. There was evidence tending to show that said building was worth from $8,000 to $9,000. … Aldridge v. Ins. Co., ante, 683; Smith v. Ins. Co., 193 N. C., 446 ; Bullard v. Ins. Co., 189 N. C., 34 ; Ins. Co. v. Lumber Co., 186 N. C., 269 ; Johnson v. Ins. Co., 172 N. C., 142 .

McCoy v. Greensboro City Board of Education

179 F. Supp. 745 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 14, 1960

Briggs v. Elliott, D.C.E. D.S.C.1955, 132 F.Supp. 776 ; Thompson v. County School Board of Arlington County, D.C.E.D.Va.1956, 144 F.Supp. 239 ; School Board of City of Newport News, Va. v. … Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, 347 U.S. 483, 484 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ; Brown v. Board of Education, 1955, 349 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 ;

Greensboro Elks Lodge v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic Control

27 N.C. App. 594 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1975

Freeman v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 264 N.C. 320 , 141 S.E. 2d 499 (1965). Thus, we proceed to analyze the competency of the evidence introduced before respondent’s hearing officer. … Where the findings of respondent Board are supported by material and substantial competent evidence as here, they are conclusive on review by the superior court. Parker v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 23 N.C.

Johnson v. Board of Tr. of Durham Technical Cmty. Coll.

357 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 2003

Huyck Corp. v. Town of Wake Forest

321 N.C. 589 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1988

BROWN, JR. and wife, EMMA BROWN; RUSSELL S. FINCH and wife, ANNE C. FINCH; RICHARD E. HAILEY and wife, BECKY HAILEY; JERRY W. LAWS and wife, PAT LAWS; JAMES L. DAVIS and wife, MRS. JAMES L. DAVIS; JAMES L. … PENDERGRASS v. TOWN OF WAKE FOREST No. 320PA87 (Filed 3 February 1988) On discretionary review of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 86 N.C.

N. C. Monroe Construction Co. v. Guilford County Board of Education

278 N.C. 633 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 12, 1971

In Morganton v. … In Brewer v. Brasted, 11 Pa. D & C 103, a contract for the erection of a school building was alleged to be invalid because the school board was not legally constituted.

State ex rel. Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Wilmington & Weldon Railroad

122 N.C. 877 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1898

The point was considered and adjudged in the cases of Rhyne v. Lipscombe, State v. Ray and Tate v. Commissioners, a t this Term. … C., 425 , it is an administrative court (somewhat like the Board of County Commissioners).

Eirschele Ex Rel. Eirschele v. Craven County Board of Education

7 F. Supp. 2d 655 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 20, 1998

Id. at *41-*42; see also Cynthia K. v. Board of Education, No. 95 C 7172, 1996 WL 164381 , at *2 (N.D.Ill.1996) (citing Casey and holding that expert witness fees “are simply not recoverable” under the IDEA). … See Smith v. Robinson, 468 U.S. 992, 1009 , 104 S.Ct. 3457 , 82 L.Ed.2d 746 (1984); Duane M. v. Orleans Parish School Board, 861 F.2d 115, 117 (5th Cir.1988).

Murdock v. Commissioners.

138 N.C. 124 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1905

Brown, J. His Honor, Judge Bryan, instructed the jury upon the evidence to answer the issue “no” and gave judgment for plaintiffs for $95.61, the amount of the tax which plaintiffs had paid. … “The following is the order of said board: 'Ordered that the clerk of this board make out tax receipt against Watt & Murdock for $10,080., as a corrected receipt for return of 1902.’ *126 “At the meeting of the board of commissioners

Rogers v. Powell

174 N.C. 388 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 24, 1917

Fuel Co. v. Staton, at present term; Comrs. v. McDaniel, 52 N. C., 107 ; Burke v. Elliott, 26 N. C., 355 ; Tar River Co. v. Neal, 10 N. C., 520 ; Brown v. O’Connel, 36 Conn., 432 ; 8 Am. and Eng. … There is nothing in the case of Salisbury v. Croom, 167 N. C., 223 , cited for plaintiff board, that in any way militates against our present decision.

Izard Ex Rel. Izard v. Hickory City Schools Board of Education

68 N.C. App. 625 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1984

Kiser v. Snyder, 21 N.C. App. 708, 710 , 205 S.E. 2d 619, 621 (1974) (quoting Luna v. Needles Elementary School District, 154 Cal. App. 2d 803 , 316 P. 2d 773 (1957)). … As his own deposition testimony states: I knew I was supposed to take a board and sweep the other board away so I wouldn’t cut my hand but I moved my hand across there and got it up into the blade ...

Hoke v. BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAM. OF STATE OF NC

395 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 6, 1975

Hoke’s position rested primarily on Larkin v. … Hoke has vigorously asserted that his case is identical with, if not stronger than, Larkin v. Withrow, supra, since here the Board can revoke and not simply suspend.