Case law

Guthrie v. North Carolina State Ports Authority

307 N.C. 522 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 1983

Turner v. Board of Education, 250 N.C. 456 , 109 S.E. 2d 211 (1959). … Greene v. Board of Education, 237 N.C. 336 , 75 S.E. 2d 129 (1953).

Cabaniss v. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.

170 N.C. App. 180 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 2005

Brown, Alex. Brown Management Services, Inc. (“Alex. Brown”), DC Investment Partners, LLC (“DCIP”), and D.B. Alex. Brown Exchange Fund, I, L.P. (“Exchange Fund”), by plaintiffs Eda Hofstead Cabaniss (“Mrs. … Schreiber v. Bryan, 396 A.2d 512, 517 (Del. Ch. 1978). Because plaintiffs failed to make demand on Alex. Brown or excuse such demand as futile as required by 6 Del.

State v. McCollum

321 N.C. 557 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1988

E.g., State v. Parrish, 275 N.C. 69 , 165 S.E. 2d 230 (1969). … State v. Tomblin, 276 N.C. at 276 , 171 S.E. 2d at 903 .

North Carolina Chiropractic Ass'n v. North Carolina State Board of Education

122 N.C. App. 122 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1996

The Board’s denial was made upon unlawful procedure in that the Board failed to provide the NCCA with a written statement of the reasons for denying the NCCA’s rule-making petition, as required by G.S. 150B-20(c); b. … The Board’s denial was unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record; and c. The Board’s denial was arbitrary and capricious.

Brown v. Artisan 2510, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2014

Cameron-Brown Co. v. Daves, 83 N.C. App. 281, 285, 350 S.E.2d 111, 114 (1986). … Brown and Ferrone had been acquaintances for approximately 8 years, had previously invested together, and had sat on the same board of directors.

White v. Hester

1 N.C. App. 410 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1968

Crosby v. Crosby, 1 N.C. App. 398 , 161 S.E. 2d 654 (filed this date). Nevertheless, we have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by plaintiffs and defendants and find no prejudicial error.

Sugar Creek Charter School, Inc. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

188 N.C. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2008

Tucker v. City of Kannapolis, 159 N.C. App. 174, 178 , 582 S.E.2d 697, 699 (2003). … Martin v. Ray Lackey Enterprises, Inc., 100 N.C. App. 349, 357 , 396 S.E.2d 327, 332 (1990).

ME v. Board of Educ. for Buncombe County

88 F. Supp. 2d 493 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 17, 1999

Board of Educ. of Hendrick Hudson Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 201 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). … In essence, district courts must “ ‘make an independent decision based on a preponderance of the evidence, while giving due weight to state administrative proceedings.’ ” Board of Educ. of Montgomery County v.

Bynum Ex Rel. Boette v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education

363 N.C. 580 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 27, 2009

682 S.E.2d 207 (2009) Antwan BYNUM, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Wayne BOETTE, and Anita Bynum v. The NASH-ROCKY MOUNT BOARD OF EDUCATION. No. 172P09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 27, 2009. W.

Kinston Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc. v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.

235 N.C. 737 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 11, 1952

Telephone Co. v. Telephone Co., 159 N.C. 9 , 74 S.E. 636 ; Woolen Mills v. Land Co., 183 N.C. 511 , 112 S.E. 24 ; Keys v. Alligood, 178 N.C. 16 , 100 S.E. 113 . … Hospital v. Wilmington, ante, 597.

Robert E. Harris Evangelistic Ass'n v. Board of Tax Supervision

3 N.C. App. 479 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1969

Rule 48 of the Rules of Practice of this Court; Carter v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 274 N.C. 484 , 164 S.E. 2d 1 ; Kelly v. Washington, 3 N.C. App. 362 , 164 S.E. 2d 634 (filed 31 December 1968); Williams v.

Frieson v. North Carolina Real Estate Licensing Board

72 N.C. App. 665 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1985

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the Board’s findings of fact is not before us, since no exceptions were made to the findings. Cox v. Real Estate Licensing Board, 47 N.C. … This provision is permissive, of course, not mandatory, and it authorized the Board to continue the hearing or not as it deemed meet in the sound exercise of its discretion. Davis v. N.C.

State to the Use of the Board of Education v. . Moody

74 N.C. 73 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

Rep., 529 , State v. Moody, where the State moved for execution against the defendant, Moody, upon the forfeited recognizance, and the defendant relied- upon the facts now set: forth as a plea in lar.

Keller v. Shook Builder Supply Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 27, 2002

Brown, a board certified orthopaedic surgeon, testified as of May 25, 1999, the employee's condition was substantially changed/worsened from 1994 with left leg pain instead of right leg pain, and severe chronic pain. … Brown, board certified orthopaedic surgeon, that: — Before May 25, 1999, the employee had surgery for a herniated disk, after which, except for some flare-ups, he had done relatively well.

Porter v. . Durham

74 N.C. 767 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

Cited: Staton v. R. R. , 109 N.C. 341 ; Fleming v. R. R. , 115 N.C. 696 ; Mizzell v. McGowan , 120 N.C. 138 ; Porter v. Armstrong , 129 N.C. 102 ; Mullen v. Canal Co. , 130 N.C. 502 ; Davis v. … Smith , 141 N.C. 109 , 110 ; Clark v. Guano Co. , 144 N.C. 76 ; Greenwood v. R. R. , 144 N.C. 448 ; Briscoe v. Parker , 145 N.C. 17 ; Brown v. R. R. , 165 N.C. 395 , 396 ; Yowmans v.

Johnson v. Board of Tr. of Durham Technical Cmty. Coll.

357 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 2003

Case v. . Ewbanks

194 N.C. 775 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1927

The building had been used for many years as a hotel or boarding house. There was evidence tending to show that said building was worth from $8,000 to $9,000. … Aldridge v. Ins. Co., ante, 683; Smith v. Ins. Co., 193 N. C., 446 ; Bullard v. Ins. Co., 189 N. C., 34 ; Ins. Co. v. Lumber Co., 186 N. C., 269 ; Johnson v. Ins. Co., 172 N. C., 142 .

North Carolina State Board of Education v. State of North Carolina

368 N.C. 903 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 9, 2016

ORDER Defendants’ Petitions for Writ of Certiorari are allowed for the limited purpose of vacating the order entered by the Court of Appeals on 2 March 2016 allowing Plaintiff-Appellee State Board of Education’s Motion to

State v. . Murph

212 N.C. 494 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1937

The verdict of guilty as to the defendant Will Brown was set aside by the judge, and upon his suggestion and with his approval the action as to the defendant Will Brown was nol prossed with leave by the solicitor for the … See S. v. Lawrence, 196 N. C., 562 , 146 S. E., 395 ; S. v. Burleson, 198 N. C., 61 , 150 S. E., 628 ; Wigmore on Evidence, Vol. 1, sec. 660, p. 1063. There is no error in tbe judgment. It is affirmed. No error.

City of Winston-Salem v. Smith

216 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1939

Gunter v. Sanford, 186 N. C., 452 , 120 S. E., 41 ; Charlotte v. Brown, 165 N. C., 435 , 81 S. E., 611 . … But where the board acts in violation of it, the assessment is void and jurisdictional, and can be *6 taken advantage of at any time when the assessment is sought to be enforced. Charlotte v. Brown, supra.