Case law

Matteson v. Batchelder

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 1, 2008

Brown v. Denormandie, 123 Me. 535,542, 124 A.2d 697,699 (1924). … See Trask v. Public Utilities Comm 'n, 1999 ME 93, , 12, 731 A.2d 430,432-33; Town of Waltham v.

New England Accessories Trade Ass'n v. Tierney

528 F. Supp. 404 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 7, 1981

Browne, 502 F.Supp. 1245 (D.Conn.1980); Florida Businessmen for Free Enterprise v. Florida, 499 F.Supp. 346 (N.D.Fla.1980). … See The Casbah, Inc. v. Thone, supra, 651 F.2d at 561 n.14; New England Accessories Trade Ass'n v. Browne, supra, 502 F.Supp. at 1253-54 ; Mid-Atlantic Accessories Trade Ass'n v.

Elliott v. Montgomery

135 Me. 372 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 25, 1938

The plaintiff was thrown, or jumped, from the running board and sustained the injuries complained of. … Kimball v. Davis, 117 Me., 187, 103 A., 154 ; Lane v. Atlantic Works, 111 Mass., 136 .

Banchor v. Cilley

38 Me. 553 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1854

“A delivery by the consignor of goods, on board of a ship, chartered by the consignee, is a delivery to the consignee; and the rule is the same, if they were put on board a general ship for the conveyance.” 2 Kent’s Com. … In Carter & al. v.

Inhabitants of Hartland v. Inhabitants of Saint Albans

123 Me. 82 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 7, 1923

Lewiston v. Harrison, 69 Maine, 508. … Clinton v. Benton, 49 Maine, 554. What is reasonable and proper must be left in the first instance to their sound and honest discretion. But they have not unlimited power.

Dodge v. Town of Norridgewock

577 A.2d 346 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 18, 1990

Eastern Fine Paper v. Garriga Trading Co., 457 A.2d 1111, 1113 (Me.1983); Cape Elizabeth School Bd. v. … Perry v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 481 A.2d 133, 134 (Me.1984).

Fournier v. Department of Corrections

983 A.2d 403 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 2009

Corp. v. Bangor Historic Track, Inc., 2000 ME 102, ¶ 11 , 751 A.2d 1024, 1029-30 . This time limit must be applied uniformly and consistently to parties represented by counsel and self-represented parties alike. … See Brown v.

The Moravian

17 F. Cas. 725 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1877

In Clark v. Barnwell, 12 How. [53 U. S.] 272, the bill of lading was substantially of a similar character. … The rule of law laid down in the Exchequer, Scott v. London & St. K.

Rowe v. Maine

324 F. Supp. 2d 238 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 2, 2004

Mental incompetence is not a per se reason to toll the statute of limitations, Brown v. McKee, 232 F.Supp.2d 761, 767 (E.D.Mich.2002); see also, Nunnally v. … Appx. at 760 ; Brown, 232 F.Supp.2d at 768 ; Williams v. Price, 2002 WL 551037 , *5 (E.D.Mich. March 29, 2002).

Randall v. Tuell

38 L.R.A. 143 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 5, 1897

S., c. 27, can recover for board and lodging furnished by him in such inn. … Woodward, 38 Maine, 192, an innholder, without license, sought to establish a lien for board upon the property of a guest committed to his charge, and the want of a license was held to be fatal to his claim.

Elliott v. Sawyer

107 Me. 195 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 10, 1910

Pellerin v. International Paper Co., 96 Maine, 388; McCarthy v. Claflin, 99 Maine, 290. … Amburg v. International Paper Company, 97 Maine, 327; McCarthy v. Claflin, 99 Maine, 290.

Holt v. Westcott

43 Me. 445 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

In Spencer v. … The same doctrine was held in Howard v. Middleton, 3 McCord, 121 . Grant and al. v.

State v. Hersom

90 Me. 273 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 13, 1897

Had the respondent hit a person standing where the key-board was, although he aimed his rock at the head of the complainant, and there were an indictment against him for an assault on such other person, then the presumption … State v. Gilman, 69 Maine, 163. In fact there is no such legal presumption. It is merely a presumption of fact which the law sometimes sanctions, or approves, or allows a jury to act upon.

State of Maine v. M/V Tamano

357 F. Supp. 1097 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 26, 1973

In McCready v. … Should the Maine statute be declared unconstitutional, the Board’s claim under it in the present case would, of course, also fall. 4 .

Davis v. City of Bangor

101 Me. 311 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 27, 1906

If the foregoing instruction be correct in the abstract, upon the authority of Blood v. … Keeley v. Portland, 100 Maine, 260. The case therefore comes exactly within the rule laid down in Keeley v.

Bradbury v. Fire Insurance

80 Me. 396 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 12, 1888

Everett v. Continental Ins. Co. 21 Minn. 76 ; Holbrook v. St. Paul F. & M. Ins. Co. 25 Minn. 229 ; McClure v. Girard Ins. Co. 43 Iowa, 349 ; Longueville v. Western Ins. Co. 51 Iowa, 553 ; Lyons v. … Lyons v. Providence Washington Ins. Co. 13 R. I. 347 ; Eddy Street Iron Foundry v. Hampden S. & M. F. Ins. Co. 1 Cliff. 300 ; Ring v. Phœnix Assurance Co. Mass. N. E. R. V. 5, No. 14, p. 387.

Zorn v. Carl R. Smith Potatoes

704 A.2d 864 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 24, 1997

The Board concluded that Smith was exempt from the obligation of securing payment of workers’ compensation pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 401(1) (Supp.1996) and that the Board lacked jurisdiction over the injury. 39-A M.R.S.A … Dishon v. Maine State Retirement Sys., 569 A.2d 1216, 1217 (Me.1990) (quoting McNicholas v.

Keatinge v. Biddle

188 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 21, 2002

of Overseers of the Bar v. … Hodsdon, 690 A.2d 986, 989 (Me.1997); Board of Overseers of the Bar v.

Anderson v. Standard Granite Co.

92 Me. 429 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 23, 1899

The original written contract fixed the price at $45 per thousand for blocks to be delivered by the plaintiff “on board vessels at Lane’s wharf, in Searsport, Me., at which wharf there is ten feet of water or more.” … Reed v. Boardman, 20 Pick. 441 ; Donohue v. Woodbury, 6 Cush. 148 ; Fuller v. Kent, 138 N. Y. 231 ; McDaniels v. Bank of Rutland, 29 Vt. 230 .

Associated Hospital Service of Maine v. Mahoney

161 Me. 391 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 13, 1965

Co. v. State Board of Equalizers, 94 So. 681 , 689 (Fla. 1922); Smyth v. Titcomb, 31 Me. 272, 285 , but with cases contra as in Van Horn, et al. v. State ex rel. Abbott, 64 N. … Sullivan v. Boos, 126 N. W. (2nd) 579, 582 (Wis. 1964), or when an officer acts under advice of the State’s Attorney General. Baker, supra; State ex rel. Equality Sav. & Bldg. Ass’n v. Brown, 68 S.