Case law

Brown v. Hutchinson

155 N.C. 205 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 12, 1911

In this case the plaintiff had already introduced a grant from the State to Eli Brown, dated October, 1846, and duly registered. He could therefore have shown seven years’ possession under color. Gilchrist v. … The deeds from Eli Brown to Absher in 1855 and of Absher to Elijah Brown in 1859, and the deed from the latter’s executors in 1862, recorded in- 1885, were competent to show color of title. In Janney v. Robbins, 141 N.

State v. Brown

177 N.C. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2006

Brown cites State v. … State v. Lynch, 334 N.C. 402, 409 , 432 S.E.2d 349, 352 (1993). Brown’s reliance on Rule 609 is misplaced.

Brown v. Ginn

181 N.C. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 2007

Louise Dixon Ginn (“defendant”) appeals from judgment granting summary judgment to Connie Ginn Brown, Ralph Leroy Ginn and the Estate of Henry Lee Ginn (“plaintiffs”). … Tyndall-Taylor v. Tyndall, 157 N.C. App. 689, 691 , 580 S.E.2d 58, 60 (2003). The intent of the parties is determined by examining the plain language of the contract. Bueltel v. Lumber Mut. Ins. Co., 134 N.C.

Harris v. . Brown

123 N.C. 419 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1898

Syme v. Trice , 96 N.C. 246 . … Everett v. Reynolds , 114 N.C. 367 . The sale was made 15 years ago, and if the defendant believed the record would not protect him, he should have made his fears known at an earlier day. Affirmed.

Cline v. Brown

286 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1975

CLINE v. Bertram Ervin BROWN II. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 4, 1975. Wilson & Morrow, for the plaintiff. Jordan, Wright, Nichols, Caffrey & Hill, for the defendant.

Brown v. . Buchanan

194 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 14, 1927

Tripp v. Little, 186 N. C., 215 ; Sullivan v. Blount, 165 N. C., 7 ; Hemphill v. Hemphill, 138 N. C., 504 . … In Hoge v. Lee, 184 N.

Coble v. Brown

1 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1968

Brown v. Doby, 242 N.C. 462 , 87 S.E. 2d 921 (1955). The North Carolina Supreme Court, in Harrison v. Hanvey, supra, recognized that, although the weight of authority is to the contrary, the rule of Brown v. … The Court said, "Assuming that the same rule (referring to Brown v.

Solesbee v. Brown

255 N.C. App. 603 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 2017

SOLESBEE and husband CARL SOLESBEE, Petitioners, v. CHERYL H. BROWN and husband ROGER BROWN, GWENDA H. ANGEL and husband WESLEY ANGEL, and LISA H. DEBRUHL and husband J. … Brown v. Boger, 263 N.C. 248, 256, 139 S.E.2d 577, 582 (1965).

State v. . Brown

125 N.C. 704 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1899

In State v. Dixon, 114 N. C., 850 , it is said: “In trials for this offense it must be borne in mind that the guilty intent is the intent to carry the weapon concealed, and does not depend upon the intent to use it. … This case reviewed previous authorities, and has itself been cited and followed in State v. Pigford, 117 N. C., 748 ; State v. Reams, 121 N. C., 556 . In this last case, FatRcuoth, O.

Brown v. Boney

41 N.C. App. 636 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1979

Gregory v. Lynch, 271 N.C. 198 , 155 S.E. 2d 488 (1967); Matthews v. Lineberry, 35 N.C. App. 527 , 241 S.E. 2d 735 (1978); 1 Strong’s N. C. Index 3d, Appeal and Error, § 46.1 (1976). … Parker v. Edwards, 222 N.C. 75 , 21 S.E. 2d 876 (1942).

State v. . Brown

207 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1934

S. v. Griggs, 197 N. C., 352 , 148 S. E., 547 ; Brown v. Sheets, 197 N. C., 268 , 148 S. E., 233 ; S. v. Palmore, 189 N. C., 538 , 127 S. E., 599 ; S. v. Wheeler, 185 N. C., 670 , 116 S. E., 413 . … S. v. Keaton, supra; S. v. Lee, 206 N. C., 472 , 174 S. E., 288 . New trial.

Brown v. Griffin

263 N.C. 61 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1964

Pensak v. Peerless Oil Co., 166 A. 792 ; Limbert v. Bishop, 101 S.E. 2d 148 ; Morgan v. Woodruff, 208 S.W. 2d 628 ; Hudgens v. Mayeaux, 143 So. 2d 606 ; Martin v. Sheffield, 189 P. 2d 127 ; 15 AM. … Brown: “We are pleased to attach our draft in the amount of $500.00, payable to you on the Medical Expenses incurred as a result of the captioned accident.

Wilson v. Brown

134 N.C. 400 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1904

Brown, in which a sale under two executions issued from the Superior Court of Greene County, upon judgments in favor of G. G. Edwards and wife v. B. F. Wilson, Julia C. Dixon, Executrix, v. B. F. Wilson, is recited. … Brown, was adverse to him and if continued for twenty years would have ripened into perfect title. Scarborough v. Scarborough, 122 N. C., 234 .

Woodridge v. . Brown

149 N.C. 299 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1908

Thomas v. Simpson, 80 N. C., 4 . In Love v. Miller, 104 N. C., 582 , the contract was to sell cotton to be of “average grade of low middling,” etc. Held, a warranty that it would come up to the description. In Reiger v. … Critcher v. Porter McNeal Co., 135 N. C., 542 ; Allen v. Tompkins, 136 N. C., 208 .

Brown v. . McKee

108 N.C. 387 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1891

In Ruggles v. … So in Hooks v.

State v. Brown

242 N.C. App. 678 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2015

Brown v. . Guthery

190 N.C. 822 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1925

Whitehurst v. Gotwalt, 189 N. C., 577 . … Tested remainders are defined by Justice Walker in Richardson v. Richardson, 152 N.

Brown v. Miller

63 N.C. App. 694 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1983

An upset bid was filed by the plaintiffs former spouse, Robert Lindsay Brown, on 11 May 1978. … In Baggett v.

State v. Brown

20 N.C. App. 413 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1974

Nevertheless, we hold that this affidavit is sufficient under Aguilar v. Texas, supra, and State v. Ellington, supra. … State v. Ellington, supra, at 204, [quoting U. S. v.

Brown v. Railroad

141 N.C. 874 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1906