Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.90s
225 So. 3d 832 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 11, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text194 A.3d 716 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2018
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text202 Vt. 656 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Jul 14, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text226 So. 3d 839 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 4, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textPeak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
509 Pa. 267 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1985
The Commonwealth Court’s holding here, as in Wilson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 72 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 504 , 457 A.2d 164 (1983), and Kustafik v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 75 Pa. … Appellant’s reliance on Jack v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 68 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 624 , 449 A.2d 883 (1982); Krimmell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 65 Pa.
Cited 337 timesPublished86 N.E.3d 171 · Indiana Supreme Court · Apr 20, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text225 So. 3d 823 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 20, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text228 So. 3d 561 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 14, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text229 So. 3d 1222 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 15, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textBrown & Brown of MT, Inc. v. Raty
367 Mont. 67 · Montana Supreme Court · Nov 20, 2012
Tomlin Enters., Inc. v. … Meadow Lake Estates Homeowners Ass’n v. Shoemaker, 2008 MT 41, ¶ 40, 341 Mont. 345, 178 P.3d 81; Cook v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedSt. Thomas Malankara Orthodox Church, Inc. v. Board of Appeals
23 A.D.3d 666 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 28, 2005
Davies, 208 AD2d 627, 628 [1994]; see Cornell Univ. v Bagnardi, 68 NY2d 583 [1986]; Matter of Westchester Reform Temple v Brown, *667 22 NY2d 488 [1968]; Matter of Rosenfeld v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Ramapo, 6 AD3d … Accordingly, the Board’s determination was arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion, and was properly annulled (see Matter of Genesis Assembly of God v Davies, supra; Matter of Harrison Orthodox Minyan v Town Bd.
Cited 5 timesPublished228 So. 3d 561 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 14, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text83 N.E.3d 164 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text792 S.E.2d 188 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text83 N.E.3d 159 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text228 So. 3d 568 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 6, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text222 So. 3d 1203 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 1, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text222 So. 3d 1203 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 31, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text228 So. 3d 553 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 6, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text278 Or. 263 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1977
Brownley v. Lincoln County, 218 Or 7 , 343 P2d 529 (1959). In Protrka v. … Lantis v. Lantis, 239 Or 126, 128 , 396 P2d 755 (1964); Black v. Black, 274 Or 359, 364 , 546 P2d 1074 (1976).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna