Case law

Metzenbaum v. Brown

448 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 1978

Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Brown, C.A. No. 78-293 (D.D.C., filed Feb. 21, 1978). Pursuant to Local Rule 3-4 that case has been assigned to this Court. … Steinthal & Co. v. Seamans, 147 U.S. App.D.C. 221, 455 F.2d 1289 (1971). These principles apply to actions brought by Senators and Congressmen to enjoin Executive Branch action. Compare Kennedy v.

Brown v. United States

952 A.2d 942 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 2008

Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118, 124 (D.C.1996) (quoting Elliott v. United States, 633 A.2d 27, 32 (D.C.1993)). … Brown, supra, 683 A.2d at 124 (quoting Jenkins v. United States, 617 A.2d 529, 531 (D.C.1992)).

Western Coal Traffic League,petitioners v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Intervenors

216 F.3d 1168 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 14, 2000

Given the Board’s “special cognizance” over the railroad industry, National Motor Freight Traffic Ass’n v. … Fruit Growers Ass'n v. Martin, 968 F.2d 1265, 1272 (D.C.Cir.1992); see also Forester v. Consumer Prod.

Brown v. Green

767 F. Supp. 273 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 1991

Brown was carrying. … See, e.g., Schleier v.

Brown v. Bentsen

921 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 1995

Conclusions of Law The legal standard applicable to a Title VII discrimination and reprisal claim is the three-tiered test set out in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

Brown v. United States

934 A.2d 930 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2007

McFadden v. … See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 881 A.2d 586, 593 (D.C.2005). Even if we were to assume that it should have been obvious to the trial judge that the instruction was erroneous, see Johnson v.

Brown v. Hines-Williams

2 A.3d 1077 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2010

D.F. v. … Massey v. Evans, 68 A.D.3d 79 , 886 N.Y.S.2d 280 , 284 (N.Y.App.Div.2009) (citing Nebraska ex rel. Hopkins v. Batt, 253 Neb. 852 , 573 N.W.2d 425, 435 (1998); Hautala v.

Shima v. Brown

133 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1943

Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., Inc., 312 U.S. 1 , 61 S.Ct. 422 , 85 L.Ed. 479 . D.C.Code 1940, §§ 28—2707, 28—2708, 31 Stat. 1378 . Fries, Beall & Sharp Co. v. Livingstone, 56 App.D.C. 209 , 12 F.2d 150 . … New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad Co. v. Estill, 147 U.S. 591, 622, 623 , 13 S.Ct. 444, 456 , 37 L.Ed. 292 .

campaign/responsible v. Fda

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2009

Supp. at 563 n.11 (citing Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 743 (D.C. Cir. 1979)). “None of these factors are dispositive,” Piper v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 339 F. … Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 744 (D.C. Cir. 1979))).

Calderon v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 2015

Civil (F Deck) ) Defendants. ) ) V. JUDGE ERIC BROWN, et 0]., MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff 3 application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. … See, e.g., Johnson v. Williams, 699 F. Supp. 2d 159, 171 (D.D.C. 2010), aff’d sub nom. Johnson v. Fenty, No. 10-5105, 2010 WL 4340344 (DC. Cir. Oct. 1, 2010).

Brown v. Pearson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2020

Saul Co. v. … (quoting Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 74 (1972))); Mahdi v.

Brown v. United States

619 A.2d 1180 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1992

The court did instruct the jury that in its determination it might take into account that appellant Brown was entitled to mitigation. … Comber v.

Brown v. United States

40 A.2d 832 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1945

Whiting v. Fibber and Mollie Tea Room, 154 Pa.Super. 106 , 35 A.2d 598, 600 . State v. Andrews, 130 Iowa 609 , 105 N.W. 215, 216 . People v. Marrs, 125 Mich. 376 , 84 N. W. 284, 285 . … Bush, 56 Cal.App.2d 877 , 133 P.2d 870 ; People v. Baker, 251 Mich. 322 , 232 N.W. 381 ; People v. Gage, 62 Mich. 271 , 28 N.W. 835 , 4 Am.St.Rep. 854 ; Kenney v.

Brown v. United States

289 A.2d 891 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1972

See the concurring opinion of Judge Nebeker in District of Columbia v. Faison, D.C.App., 278 A.2d 688 (1971). … Jenkins v. United States, D.C.App., 284 A.2d 460, 464 (1971). Affirmed. 1 . Cf. Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure which contains a similar clause.

Mourning v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2023

Civil Action No. 23-0996 (UNA) JOHN BROWN, et al., Defendants. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A complaint that lacks “an arguable basis either in law or in fact” is frivolous. Neitzke v.

Brown v. Samper

247 F.R.D. 188 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 2008

Hooker-Robinson v. Rice, 2006 WL 2130652 , at *3 (D.D.C. July 27, 2006) (quoting Jeffers v. Chao, 2005 WL 1432374 , at *4 (D.D.C. June 14, 2005)). … Ben-Kotel v. Howard Univ., 319 F.3d 532, 536 (D.C.Cir.2003).

Brown v. United States

864 A.2d 996 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 2005

Hackes, 446 A.2d 396, 398 (D.C.1982)); accord, Brown v. … See Brown v. United States, 589 A.2d 434, 436 (D.C.1991).

Brown v. Wolf

District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 2023

In Brown v. Brody, the D.C. … Instead, before Chambers, courts regularly applied Brown to involuntary transfers. See, e.g., Freedman v. MCI Telecomms. Corp., 255 F.3d 840, 844 (D.C. Cir. 2001); Sharpe v. Bair, 580 F.

Brown v. Shinseki

District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 2023

BROWN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14-1457 (JMC) v. DENIS R. … Brown signed her petition and was therefore ultimately responsible for its content. See Link v. Wabash R.

Brown v. United States

274 A.2d 683 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1971

Appellant relies on a previous declaration of the common-law rule by this court in Curtis v. … However, in Curtis v.