Case law

Brown v. State

32 Ala. App. 500 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1946

Bolden et al. v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 215 Ala. 334 , 110 So. 574 , 49 A.L.R. 1206 ; Morhous v. Supreme Court of New York, 293 N.Y. 131 , 56 N.E.2d 79 ; Lyons v. … Smith v. State, 245 Ala. 161 , 16 So.2d 315 ; Johnson v. Williams, Warden, 244 Ala. 391 , 13 So.2d 683 ; Skipper v. Schumacher, 124 Fla. 384 , 169 So. 58 ; Chambers v. State, 117 Fla. 642 , 158 So. 153 ; Lamb v.

Owens v. State

507 So. 2d 576 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Apr 14, 1987

To comport with due process, a state disciplinary board's decision must not have been made arbitrarily or capriciously, but must have been based upon substantial evidence. Rice v. … Wolff v. McDonnell; Rice v. State; Washington v. State.

Broussard v. Brown

353 So. 2d 804 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jan 4, 1978

See Birwood Paper Co. v. Damsky , 285 Ala. 127 , 229 So.2d 514 (1969); 14 Ala.Dig. Malicious Practice 21 (1). … See Alabama Dry Dock Shipbuilding Co. v. Bates , 33 Ala. App. 81 , 30 So.2d 273 (1947); 14 Ala.Dig. Malicious Practice 21 (2).

Brown v. State

374 So. 2d 391 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Feb 20, 1979

John v. State , 18 Ala. … . — Tucker v. Henniker , 41 N.H. 317 ; Berry v. State , 10 Ga. 511 ; Mitchum v. State , 11 Ga. [615] 628."

Bivens v. Brown

37 Ala. 422 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1861

The issue in this case was, wliafc were the terms of the contract between Bivens and Brown ? … .” — Blakey v. Blakey, 33 Ala. 621.; Ortez v. Jewett, 23 Ala. 662 . [2.]

Brown v. Wheeler

437 So. 2d 521 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 26, 1983

These appeals are by Dane Brown and Mary Gail Brown from an order of the trial court setting aside the appointment of an administrator ad litem and dismissing the claims against William V. Phifer, a deceased defendant. … Rende v. Kay , 415 F.2d at 984 .

Whitehead v. Brown

18 Ala. 682 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1851

The bill has two objects — to reform the deed, and to be relieved against the defendant Brown. … I have done no more than to state the case, because the case of Stone, Trustee, v. Hale, et al., 17 Ala. 557 , shows clearly that the complainant has a right to have the deed reformed and to be relieved agaiust Brown.

Brown v. Turner

15 Ala. 832 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1849

Brown v. State

22 Ala. App. 290 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1928

Cook v. State, 17 Ala. App. 347 , 85 So. 823 ; Brown v. State, 108 Ala. 18 , 18 So. 811 ; Palmer v. State, 168 Ala. 124 , 53 So. 283 . … The evidence in this case took a wide range, showing the separation of Brown and his wife and Mrs.

Wilson v. Brown

241 Ala. 178 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 30, 1941

Farmer v. Board of School Com’rs of Mobile County et al., 226 Ala. 62 , 145 So. 575 . (Italics supplied.) … City of Mobile v. Board of R. & R. Com’rs Mobile County, 180 Ala. 489 , 61 So. 368 ; State ex rel. Denson v. Miller, President of Jury Commission of Shelby County, 204 Ala. 232 , 85 So. 698 .

Larry v. Brown

153 Ala. 452 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 14, 1907

—Johnson v. Thomas, 77 Ala. 367; Heard v. Pulaski, 80 Ala. 502 , 2 South. 343 ; McCurdy v. Middleton, 82 Ala. 131, 137 , 2 South. 721 ; Kent & Barnett v. Marks & Gayle, 101 Ala. 350, 353 , 14 South. 472 . … . — Strickland v. Har die, 82 Ala. 412, 414 , 3 South. 40 ; Boyd & Co. v. Jones & Poye, 96 Ala. 305, 308 , 11 South. 405 , 38 Am. St. Rep. 100 ; Pearce v. Walker, 103 Ala. 250, 252 , 15 Soutt. 568; Darden v.

Brown v. State

39 Ala. App. 149 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1957

Howard, and Frank V. Potts. “James H. Brown “Witness: “Floyd Mitchell “T. O. Howard “J. Earl Romine “Frank V. … See Cleveland v. State, 86 Ala. 1 , 5 So. 426 (murder); Chatham v. State, 92 Ala. 47 , 9 So. 607 (larceny); Ray v. State, 257 Ala. 418 , 59 So.2d 582 (murder); Moran v.

Brown v. State

21 Ala. App. 371 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 11, 1926

Palmer v. State, 165 Ala. 129 , 51 So. 358; Davis v. State, 20 Ala. 463 , 103 So. 73 . Being corroborated, the question of guilt was for the jury. … Taylor v. State, 20 Ala. App. 161 , 101 So. 160 ; Bailum v. State, 17 Ala. App. 679 , 88 So. 200 .

Brown v. State

105 Ala. 117 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1894

—Ex parte Pruitt & Harper, 99 Ala. 227 ; Ex parte Crawlin, 92 Ala. 101 ; Foster v. The State, 88 Ala. 182; Nicholson v. The State, 72 Ala. 178 .

Brown v. Jefferson

203 So. 3d 1213 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Apr 4, 2014

Ex parte Board of Zoning Adjustment of Mobile, 636 So.2d 415 (Ala.1994).’ ” Ferraro v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Birmingham, 970 So.2d 299, 302 (Ala.Civ.App.2007) (quoting Town of Orrville v. … See, e.g., Board of Zoning Adjustment for City of Fultondale v.

Roddam v. Brown

201 Ala. 109 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 20, 1917

Bixby-Theisen Co. v. … Herring v. Skaggs, supra; Jones v. Ross, 98 Ala. 448 , 13 South. 319 ; Bessemer Ice Delivery Co. v. Brannen, 138 Ala. 157 , 35 South. 56 , and cases there cited.

Beatty v. Brown

85 Ala. 209 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1887

. — Smith v. Coleman, 59 Ala. 260 .

Brown v. State

30 Ala. App. 5 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1940

Our cases of Melton v. State, 26 Ala.App. 265 , 158 So. 196 , and Willingham v. State, 28 Ala.App. 261 , 183 So. 887 , are urged upon us as authorities for our holding, here, in accord with appellant’s insistence. … Grimes v. State, 24 Ala.App. 378 , 135 So. 652 ; Glover v. State, 25 Ala.App. 423 , 148 So. 160 ; Weaver v. State, 22 Ala. App. 162 , 114 So. 67 ; Davis v. State, 229 Ala. 674 , 159 So. 209 . The judgment is affirmed.

Brown v. Leitch

60 Ala. 313 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1877

—Ross v. Hannah, 18 Ala. 125 ; Gresham v. Walker, 10 Ala. 370 ; Bell v. Davis, 42 Ala. 460 . The right to claim personal property as exempt is a mere personal privilege .—Mickles v. Tousley, 1 Cow. 114 ; Earl v. … In Bibb v.

Brown v. Beatty

76 Ala. 250 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1884

Code, 1876, § 3704; Houston v. Fariss & McCurdy, 71 Ala. 570 ; Beck v. Glenn, 69 Ala. 121 ; Womack v. Powers, 50 Ala. 5 ; Russell v. Desplons, 29 Ala. 308 ; Trial of Title to Land (Sedgw. & Wait), § 94.