Case law

Green v. Mee

197 Okla. 562 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 3, 1945

Green requested that Finley procure an appraisement from some competent party qualified to ascertain the value of the land. … Viewed as a whole we think the evidence clearly shows Harvey Lee received a commission of $1,500 from Robert Mee.

Finstuen v. Edmondson

497 F. Supp. 2d 1295 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 19, 2006

The Supreme Court has, on numerous occasions, clearly established these parental rights are fundamental. Troxel v. … Supreme Court jurisprudence clearly establishes a fundamental right to travel. United States v.

McCord v. State

2 Okla. Crim. 214 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1909

Article 14 of the Constitution of the United States declares that: “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States: nor shall any state deprive any … The act does not in express terms forbid interstate shipments, and a reference to the *232 provisions of the act clearly shows that the right to receive interstate shipments is therein recognized.

Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County Excise Board

183 Okla. 160 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1938

After such items there appears the following: “Further for the purpose of providing adequate educational facilities to those pupils qualifying for instruction in grades not taught in this district, or who are handicapped … sections of the 19Q3 legislative act. is clearly designed to promote equality of facilities.

Rice v. Theimer

45 Okla. 618 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 1915

In the order of appointment it was recited that “it being first proven that notice of this hearing has been first given as required by law,” after which she duly qualified and gavé bond. … This is clearly a case for specific performance. The contract in writing between Elizabeth B. Theimer and Henry C.

Continental Oil Company v. Elias

307 P.2d 849 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 26, 1956

“As a general rule, the line of demarcation between an independent contractor and agent or servant cannot clearly be drawn by the courts. … The witness qualified as a traffic engineer, or highway safety engineer, and an expert as to the speed of a motor vehicle traveling on the highway, and his answer to the question propounded was based upon skid marks made

Griswold v. State

23 Okla. Crim. 136 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1922

assent of the county of Logan, aforesaid, or of any of the persons, classes of persons, estates or corporations above mentioned, and failed, refused and neglected to turn over said sum of $2,010.91 to his duly elected, qualified … The reasons for the rule are clearly set forth by the Supreme Court of Illinois in Ker v. People, 110 Ill. 627, 647 , 51 Am. Rep. 706 , 4 Am., Crim.

Application of Peppers Refining Co.

272 P.2d 416 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1954

was given in answer to, would seem to support Protestants’ theory, an examination of all that part of his testimony from which that answer is removed and set out by itself in Protestants’ brief, shows that this answer was qualified … On the basis of the evidence it is clearly entitled to be protected against' the drainage of oil from under its C. Teuscher Lease that was definitely proved to be occurring.

Bardrick v. Dillon

7 Okla. 535 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1898

We musí accept the law as we find it, and interpret its provisions according to the established and known meaning of words and the settled rules of construction. … If they establish this fact, they are entitled to have the tax based upon the excess of valuation enjoined.

Smolen v. Hatley (In Re Hatley)

227 B.R. 753 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1998

Section 523(a)(4) clearly qualifies the term “defalcation” by “[t]he phrase ‘while acting in a fiduciary capacity.’ ” See 4 King et. al., Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 523.10[l][c] (West 1998). … The Seay Court acknowledges that Oklahoma state courts have established a general policy that acknowledges the existence of a fiduciary duty between joint venturers or partners, but finds that policy inadequate to establish

Petition of Wayland

510 P.2d 1385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1971

The Supreme Court found there was no evidence in the record which would rationally justify a finding that Schware was morally unfit to practice law and denying him the opportunity to qualify for admission deprived him of … of the Board of Bar Examiners recommending denial of a license was incorrect or unfair; and that such board has a large discretion and the exercise of this discretion will not be reviewed by the Supreme Court unless it clearly

Hall

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 6, 2026

Marston base their arguments for immunity in Okla- homa law. Insofar as the Court finds that they are not immune from Ms. Hall’s claims under Oklahoma law, Ms. … Ok- lahoma law cannot grant immunity from a federal statute, so even if Ms. Mullins and Mr. Marston were immune under Oklahoma law, that immunity would not stretch to Ms.

Haines v. State

275 P.2d 347 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 23, 1954

It thus appears there was a sharp conflict in the version of the defense of the killing and that established by the state. … It clearly appears the record herein as hereinbefore indicated would have sustained a verdict of murder.

Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist Church

27 Okla. 473 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1910

But it is also the unanimous voice of these authorities that where the answer as to ownership is direct, but is subsequently qualified by a statement of the facts relative to it, or tending to show such ownership, and discloses … But we are agreed that in this case, under the facts as they appear, these questions did not call for an opinion, but a statement of fact simply, and therefore come under the rule that where the question .involves a fact clearly

Dooley v. State

82 Okla. Crim. 243 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 1946

Counsel for defendant did not properly qualify these witnesses and the attorney who is now prosecuting this appeal, and who did not appear at the trial, complains that if these witnesses had been properly qualified they would … “To reverse the judgment of conviction in this case on the facts which are either admitted or so clearly established as to be beyond controversy would be not only to delay justice, but to give no force to the statute which

Holt v. State

84 Okla. Crim. 283 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1947

Cross was clearly in rebuttal to tbe contentions of defendant that bis wife had become affiliated with J ebovah’s Witnesses after tbe deceased came to Ardmore, as she testified that her mother was forced to leave tbe defendant … After objections were made by the state that the witness was not shown to have been qualified to answer a hypothetical question concerning the defendant’s sanity, counsel for defendant should have qualified him further by

Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State

28 Okla. 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1911

decisions holding that the enrolled act may be impeached by the journals, have done so reluctantly and have expressed doubts as to the validity of the doctrine, and in many cases,' as will appear in the following section, have qualified … To hold that the Constitution has made it the mandatory duty of the Legislature, as it clearly has, to establish and maintain a system of free schools; to establish separate schools for white and colored children; to provide

OKLAHOMA SCHOOLS RISK MANAGEMENT TRUST v. LEXINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT

2026 OK 38 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 2026

The Legislature clearly intended for the agenda to provide the public with sufficient notice of all subject matter of the business that public bodies would transact at a meeting. Hirschfeld v. Oklahoma Tpk. … The matter qualifies as "new business" only if it was both unknown and could not have been reasonably foreseen at the time of posting.

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 23, 1999

Id. ¶ 11 Thus, because the statutory blueprint allows, in fact prescribes, the giving of one, two or three tests in some circumstances, the establishment of the three fees quoted above is clearly within the Commission's authority … It was based upon the premise that the applicant completed a college degree in a particular subject or field and was able to complete the curriculum examination but had not taken teacher preparation courses which would qualify

Velma-Alma Independent School District No. 15 v. Texaco, Inc.

162 P.3d 238 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 2007

. €10 The Tenth Cireuit Court of Appeals then noted that under that rule, only two of the objectors qualified as parties having the right to appeal. … Prac. & Proc. § 1797.1 ("Only clearly presented objections ... will be considered.").; 2 Newberg on Class Actions 3d, § 11.58 ("General objections without factual or legal substantiation carry little weight."); Sunrise Toyota