Case law

Prescott v. Prescott

59 Me. 146 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1871

Monk v. Guild, 3 Met. 372 . … Brown’s Divorce Court Practice, 152.

State v. Robb

100 Me. 180 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 14, 1905

Harrington v. Board of Aldermen, 20 R. I. 233, 38 L. R. A. 305. The state may even direct its destruction. Lawton v. Steele, 152 U. S. 133 ; Preston v. Drew, supra; Fisher v. … See Harrington v. Board of Aldermen, supra. In Grand Rapids v.

Deering v. City of Saco

68 Me. 322 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 25, 1878

J., in Harmon v. Jennings, 22 Maine, 240, 242, for declaring that the question not having been raised before the referees, it cannot be entertained now. See also the recent case of Raymond v. Co. … Co. v. Fox, 18 Maine, 117. Brown v. Clay, 31 Maine, 518. Morse v. Morse, 62 Maine, 443. Mitchell v. Dockray, 63 Maine, 82. Exceptions overruled. AppletoN, C. J., Walton, Barrows, Peters and Libbey, JJ., concurred. ■;

Smith v. Town of Pittston

2003 Me. 46 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 7, 2003

We held in City of Portland v. Fisherman’s Wharf Assocs. … Delogu v.

Provencher v. Moore

105 Me. 87 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 7, 1909

Sec. 52; Parker v. … Bell v. Woodman, 60 Maine, page 465; State v. Benner, 64 Maine, Page 287-8; Davis v. Roby, 64 Maine, page 427.

Sawyer v. Walker

572 A.2d 498 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 3, 1990

Sawyer, appeals the Superior Court’s (Penobscot County, Browne, A.R.J.) order on costs arising from her successful civil action against defendant, Oscar Walker. … Purwin v. Robertson Enterprises, Inc., 506 A.2d 1152, 1154 (Me.1986) (emphasis added).

Ford v. County Commissioners

64 Me. 408 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874

Hyde v. Middlesex, 2 Gray, 267 ; Brown v. Worcester, 13 Gray, 31 . … J., in Central Bridge Corporation v.

Halas v. Town of Boothbay

556 A.2d 665 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 14, 1989

Planning Board. … Camden and Rockland Water Co. v. Town of Hope, 543 A.2d 827, 829 (Me.1988). Review of the record reveals substantial evidence to support the Board’s factual finding and no arbitrary or unlawful action.

Bernstein v. Carmichael

146 Me. 446 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 30, 1951

Beaulieu v. Portland Company, 48 Me. 291 ; Connor v. Giles, 76 Me. 132 ; Nason v. West, 78 Me. 253 , 3 A. 911 . In Beaulieu v. Portland Company, supra, this court quoted the then recent English case of Cornman v. E. C. … Again, in Nason v.

McVicker v. Beedy

31 Me. 314 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1850

In Perrin v. … Eaton v. Brown, 8 Greenl. 22. It is suggested by the defendant’s counsel, that the amendment will be unavailing, because an action of debt camiot be sustained for work and labor done.

Lewis v. Penney

632 A.2d 439 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 22, 1993

Brown, 495 A.2d 324, 325 (Me.1985) (any fault by injured party bars recovery under dog-damage statute). … Henry v. Brown, 495 A.2d 324, 325 (Me.1985); Pettitt v. Lizotte, 454 A.2d 329, 335 (Me.1982). .The verdict form read as follows: 1.

Chase v. City of Portland

658 A.2d 661 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 24, 1995

Porter v. Maine State Retirement Sys., 609 A.2d 1146, 1147 (Me.1992). Although our review of findings of fact made by the Board is for clear error, Carr v. Board of Trustees of Me. … Kelley v. Commissioner, Me. Dep’t of Human Sews., 591 A.2d 1300, 1303 (Me.1991); see also Fraser v. Barton, 628 A.2d 146, 148 (Me.1993) (finding that statutory definition met reviewed for error of law).

Page v. Nissen

254 A.2d 592 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 26, 1969

Brown v. McCaffrey, et al., 1948, 143 Me. 221 , 60 A.2d 792 ; Pike v. Munroe, 1853, 36 Me. 309 . As stated in Maker v. … Hathorn v. Hinds, 1879, 69 Me. 326 ; Brown v. Heard, 1893, 85 Me. 294 , 27 A. 182 ; Hobbs v. Payson, 1893, 85 Me. 498 , 27 A. 519 ; Smith v. Sweat, 1897, 90 Me. 528 , 38 A. 554 .

Bradbury v. Inhabitants of Cumberland County

52 Me. 27 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1861

Thereupon measures were taken by the court of county commissioners, for the county of Cumberland, to have a judgment and determination, by the joint board of the commissioners of the four counties in which the highway was … At a meeting of this joint board, it was decided that a part of the road which they had adjudged to be of common convenience and necessity should be discontinued. In the case of Jones v.

Emerson v. Fisk

6 Me. 200 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1829

Then, and then only, such of the boards as might not be wanted for this purpose, were to be delivered over to them. … See Waterston & al. v. Getchell 5. Greenl. 435.

Roberta, Inc. v. Inhabitants of Town of Southwest Harbor

449 A.2d 1138 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 8, 1982

See, e.g., Cummings v. Town of Oakland, Me., 430 A.2d 825 (1981); Schwanda v. Bonney, Me., 418 A.2d 163 (1980). … See Waddell v. Briggs, Me., 381 A.2d 1132 (1978).

Midland Funding LLC v. Walton

155 A.3d 864 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 2, 2017

Windham Land Trust v. Jeffords, 2009 ME 29, ¶ 19 , 967 A.2d 690 . “If the District Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, we would have to vacate its order.” Landmark Realty v. … Express Bank FSB v.

State v. Intoxicating Liquors

82 Me. 558 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 29, 1890

Brown v. State of Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 . No one but the importer himself has the right to sell, except as allowed by the laws of the state; and he can sell only in the original packages. … v.

Young v. Central Maine Power Co.

814 A.2d 998 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 23, 2003

Lewiston Daily Sun v. Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 43, 1999 ME 143, ¶ 17 , 738 A.2d 1239, 1243 (quoting Halfway House, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Toothaker v.

Freeman v. Leighton

90 Me. 541 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 17, 1897

This is a familiar proposition enunciated in numerous decisions *545 from Storer v. Freeman, 6 Mass. 435 , to Brown v. Heard, 85 Maine, 294.