Case law

Philric Associates v. City of South Portland

595 A.2d 1061 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 16, 1991

Philric contends that the City’s treatment of its subdivision application presents concerns similar to those that we addressed in Mutton Hill Estates, Inc. v. Town of Oakland, 468 A.2d 989 (Me.1983). We disagree. … Philric has not established that any harm will result from allowing the board to complete its review in due course. State v. Maine State Employees Ass’n, 482 A.2d 461, 464 (Me.1984). The entry is: Judgment affirmed.

Little v. Thurston

58 Me. 86 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1870

Brown, 10 Maine, 49, the defendant relied on the case of Winter v. … In Chandler v. Marsh, 4 Vermont, 161, Hutchinson, C.

In re Jonas

202 A.3d 1187 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 14, 2019

See Mathews v. Eldridge , 424 U.S. 319 , 335, 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976) ; see also Fichter v. … The evidence, including the evidence introduced by the Board of events since the closing of evidence in the original trial, demonstrates a continuing practice of frivolous and vexatious actions and use of court pleadings

State v. Bradley

658 A.2d 236 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 16, 1995

The defendant is guilty if “his mental or physical faculties are impaired ‘however slightly,’ i.e., ‘to any extent.’ ” State v. Bento, 600 A.2d 1094, 1096 (Me.1991) (quoting State v. … Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1543 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 *238 (1983) (“probable cause is a flexible, commonsense standard ...

Portland Cellular Partnership v. Inhabitants of the Town of Cape Elizabeth

139 F. Supp. 3d 479 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 2015

If, however, the board acted only in an appellate capacity, then the court reviews the CEO’s decision directly. M; see also Adams v. Town of Brunswick, 2010 ME 7, ¶ 11 , 987 A.2d 502 ; Davis v. … See Hannum v. Bd. of Envtl.

Grenier v. Dow Chemical Co.

624 F. Supp. 1207 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 16, 1986

Defendant cites United States v. Brown, 603 F.2d 1022 (1st Cir.1979), in support of the proposition that subsection (b) is inapplicable in instances in which a conviction is to be used to impeach credibility. … However, Brown does not stand for such a proposition.

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. Penobscot Poultry Co.

200 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 6, 1961

Warren communicated with the Maine State Board of Conciliation and Arbitration for the purpose of having the Board designate a disinterested person to serve as arbitrator. … The remaining name was to be the third member of the board.

United States v. Petraia Maritime, Ltd.

483 F. Supp. 2d 34 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 6, 2007

See also United States v. Pringle, 751 F.2d 419, 424-25 (1 st Cir.1984) (requiring only reasonable suspicion under section 89(a) for boarding of vessel with, foreign registry on high seas). … That case, United States v. Schroder, 2006 WL 3717896 (S.D.Ala. July 6, 2006), did not involve the boarding or searching of a vessel.

Barker v. Hesseltine

27 Me. 354 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1847

The case of Brown v. Veazie, 25 Maine R. 359, may be referred to as containing much of the reasoning, and some of the principles upon which the case before us must be decided.

Pullen v. Glidden

68 Me. 559 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1878

The remark is quoted approvingly by our own court in Fitzgibbon v. Brown, 43 Maine, 169, 175. The same doctrine seems to have been held in Israel v. Brooks, 23 Ill. 575 , and Miller v. Brown, 2 Mo. 127 . … In Taylor v.

Davis v. Emery

61 Me. 140 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1870

Newell v. Hill, 2 Met. 180 ; Pike v. Brown, 7 Cush. 133 ; Maine v. Cumston, 98 Mass. 317 . … Merrifield, 10 Met. 155 , and Howard v. Lincoln, 13 Maine, 122. In Vincent v.

Cumberland & Oxford Canal Corp. v. Hitchings

65 Me. 140 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 5, 1876

And in Russell v. … The same limitation upon the measure of damages is sustained in Duncan v. Markley, 1 Harper, 276 ; Blunt v. McCormick, 3 Denio, 283 ; Thayer v. Brooks, 17 Ohio, 489.

Thanks But No Tank v. Department of Environmental Protection

86 A.3d 1 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 24, 2013

v. … Hoitt v.

State of Maine v. Raymond Bellavance Jr.

65 A.3d 1235 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 11, 2013

State v. … State v. Brown, 2000 ME 25, ¶ 19, 757 A.2d 768 (quoting Morris v. Slappy, 461 U.S. 1, 11-12 (1983)); see also United States v.

Berry v. Ross

94 Me. 270 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1900

The men on board the Bill payed out the line until orders came from the tug to “belay”, when the line on board the Bill was made fast to her port windlass-bitts. … Handley v. Call, 30 Maine, 19; Ham v. Ham, 39 Maine, 263. Cumulative evidence is additional evidence of the same kind, to the same point. Glidden v. Dunlap, 28 Maine, 379; McLaughlin v. Doane, 56 Maine, 290; Parker v.

Bailey v. Town of Kennebunk

593 A.2d 1055 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 29, 1991

Because the Superior Court acted as an intermediate appellate court, we review the decision of the Board directly. See Driscoll v. Gheewalla, 441 A.2d 1023, 1026 (Me.1982). … See Shackford & Gooch, Inc. v. Town of Kennebunk, 486 A.2d 102, 105 (Me.1984). That expansion is expressly prohibited by the Town’s zoning ordinance. See Kennebunk, Me., Zoning Ordinance art. V, § 4(D).

Rega v. L.S.R.

5 A.3d 666 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 12, 2010

See Nadeau v. Nadeau, 2008 ME 147, ¶ 42 , 957 A.2d 108, 120 . … See Brown v. Habrle, 2008 ME 17, ¶ 13 , 940 A.2d 1091, 1095 ; Carter v.

City of Bath v. Reed

78 Me. 276 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 11, 1886

. *279 By § 6 of the city charter, as amended by c. 538 of Special Laws of 1874, it is provided that there shall be a board of three assessors to be elected by the city council, one member of which board is to be elected … Soc. v. Sperry, 10 Conn. 200 ; Kelsey v. Wright, 1 Root, (Conn.) 83; People v. Runkel, 9 Johns. 147 ; Trustees v. Hills, 6 Cow. 23 ; Currie v. Medical Assurance Soc. 4 Hen. and M. (Va.) 315.

Smith v. Cannell

32 Me. 123 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1850

Hubbard v. Norton, 10 Conn. 422 . … Brown v. Staples, 28 Maine, 497. The grantor in the absolute deed has sold the land ; the mortgagee has pledged it only, for the security of the purchase money.

McGlinchy v. United States

16 F. Cas. 118 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Sep 15, 1875

Pierre, Miquelon, which is a foreign port or place, and that the schooner, with the spirits on board, regularly cleared from the port of Boston, and sailed from said port, with the spirits on board, for the said foreign port … Wood v. U. S. 10 Pet. [41 U. S.] 342; U. S. v. Walker, 22 How. [63 U. S.] 311.