Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.96s
344 Or. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 2025
Justice Resource Center v. Board of Parole, 338 Or App 509, 513, 566 P3d 1162, rev den, 374 Or ___ (2025). … Criminal Justice Reform Clinic v. Board of Parole, 313 Or App 592, 597, 496 P3d 688 (2021).
Cited 1 timesPublished344 Or. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 2025
Justice Resource Center v. Board of Parole, 338 Or App 509, 513, 566 P3d 1162, rev den, 374 Or ___ (2025). … Criminal Justice Reform Clinic v. Board of Parole, 313 Or App 592, 597, 496 P3d 688 (2021).
Cited 1 timesPublished315 Or. 273 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1993
Middleton, 294 Or 427 , 657 P2d 1215 (1983),] that was permitted, but that Middleton was decided before [State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984)]. “And the Milbradt court says [that] in State v. … State v. Brown, 299 Or 143, 152-53 , 699 P2d 1122 (1985) (party who makes later mention of subject for an independent reason cannot claim error in respect to original offer of such evidence).
Cited 74 timesPublishedMarshall v. Cosgrave, Kester, Crowe, Gidley & Lagesen
112 Or. App. 384 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1992
In Rosencrantz v. Insurance Service, *389 supra, and again in Gumbrecht v. … Brown v. SAIF, 43 Or App 447 , 602 P2d 1151 (1979), rev den 288 Or 335 (1980), is not contrary to our conclusion.
Cited 1 timesPublished228 F. Supp. 802 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 17, 1964
It is claimed that the Oregon State Board of Parole and Probation, was created in violation of the Oregon State Constitution, and that the acts of the Board are void. … Washington, 372 U.S. 487 , 83 S.Ct. 774 , 9 L.Ed.2d 899 (1963) and Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963) extended the doctrine to transcripts of proceedings.
Cited 7 timesPublishedProuty Lumber & Box Co. v. Cogan
101 Or. 382 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1921
In Kirby v. … Bean, Johns and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 7 timesPublished100 Or. 310 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1921
BROWN, J. 1, 2. When the pertinent facts in this case are analyzed in the light of the statute relating to assessment and taxation, all intricate questions disappear. … App. 59 ( 116 Pac. 296 ); in Miller v. Kraus (Cal. App.), 155 Pac. 834 ; in Wellsville Oil Co. v. Miller, 44 Okl. 493 ( 145 Pac. 344 ); in Conners v. Conners Bros. Co., 110 Me. 428 ( 86 Atl. 843 ); Harton v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedCameron v. Norco Contract Service
128 Or. App. 422 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 8, 1994
The Board agreed with insurer. … See also United Airlines, Inc. v. Brown, 127 Or App 253, 257 , 873 P2d 326 (1994).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCannon v. Hood River Irr. Dist.
79 Or. 71 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1916
The law is valid and has been upheld and action thereunder sustained by this court in several cases, namely, Board of Directors v. Peterson, 64 Or. 46 ( 128 Pac. 837 , 129 Pac. 123 ); Payette-Oregon Slope Irr. Dist. v. … The plaintiff fails to allege that he has done this: Brown v. School Dist., 12 Or. 345 ( 7 Pac. 357 ); Goodnough v. Powell, 23 Or. 525 ( 32 Pac. 396 ); Hibernian Ben. Soc. v. Kelly, 28 Or. 173 ( 42 Pac. 3 , 52 Am. St.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSmith Bros. v. Wheeler & Simmons
7 Or. 49 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879
(Moody v. Brown, 34 Maine, 107.) In New York the rule is directly the reverse of this. In a recent case, Church, C. … (Hayden v. Dements, 53 N. Y. 426 ; Dunton v. McAndrew, 44 N. Y. 72 .) The ruling in Pennsylvania is the same.
Cited 11 timesPublished326 Or. 582 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1998
Brown, 255 Or 628, 634-35 , 469 P2d 763 (1970). … ABA Standards 9.22(a) and (g); Brown.
Cited 19 timesPublishedClark & Wilson Lumber Co. v. Weed
137 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1931
The distinction is recognized in Fisher v. Betts, 12 N. D. 197 ( 96 N. W. 132 ). In that case the levy was made by the state board of equaliza *191 tion. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.
Cited 9 timesPublished67 Or. 203 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1913
Under such circumstances neither law nor equity will help them: Brown v. Levy, 29 Tex. Civ. App. 389 ( 69 S. W. 255 ); Steinmeyer v. Schroeppel, 226 Ill. 9 ( 80 N. E. 564 , 117 Am. St. Rep. 224 , 10 L. R. A. (N. … S.) 114); Crilly v. Board of Education, 54 Ill. App. 371 .
Cited 9 timesPublished85 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1917
One of the ditches is known in the record as the Beach & Platter-Leonard ditch although it is sometimes called the ‘ ‘ Old Brown or Dunn ditch.” This ditch serves two water users: George W. Dunn and Mary Ellen Leonard. … The water board found that George W.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 25, 2024
Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95, 103, 570 P2d 52 (1977). “It is the puni- tive use of detention, not the detention as such, that defines the criminal offense.” Id. … Brown, 280 Or at 103.
Cited 0 timesPublished193 Or. 158 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1951
Nye Schneider Fowler Co., 260 U.S. 35 , 67 L.Ed. 115 43 S.Ct. 55 ; Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Tucker, 230 U.S. 340 , 57 L.Ed. 1507 , 33 S.Ct. 961 ; Edwards & Browne Coal Co. v. … Prompted by the above considerations, we deem that the principle of law employed in Superior Laundry Co. v. Rose, Ex parte Young, Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. Tucker, Edwards & Browne Coal Co. v.
Cited 8 timesPublished76 Or. 92 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1915
prejudicial in a suit in equity, .where the issues are tried by the court, as in an action at law, where the disputed questions to which the par *99 ties have narrowed their several averments'are to he tried by a jury: Brown … v.
Cited 1 timesPublished34 Or. App. 375 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 1978
State v. Gilbert; 281 Or 101 , 574 P2d 313 (1978), as interpreted in State v. Cloutier, supra, 33 Or App at 125-26 , and State v. … See Or Const, Art I, § 15; see also Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95, 105 , 570 P2d 52 (1977).
Cited 67 timesPublishedPrice v. Department of Revenue
7 Or. Tax 18 · Oregon Tax Court · Jan 24, 1977
Brown, Esq., of Lake Oswego, a professor of law at Northwestern School of Law, Portland, appeared as amicus curiae in respect to the constitutional issue. … See Pacific Building v. Commission, 2 OTR 52 (1965); Lundeen v. Commission, 2 OTR 13 (1964).
Cited 49 timesPublishedGordon v. Oregon Board of Parole
District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 7, 2025
In Weidner v. … Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170, 181 (2011) (simplified); see also White v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna