Case law

In re Leuthold

116 F. Supp. 777 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 1, 1953

It provided for the recruitment until June 30, 1953 into the Regular Army for periods of not less than five years of 2,500 qualified unmarried male aliens to be integrated into established units of citizen soldiers *779 and … Meanwhile he is clearly not entitled to have his present petition for naturalization granted. Hence it will be dismissed without prejudice. Let an order to that effect be entered. .

Casey v. Brennan

344 N.J. Super. 83 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 1, 2001

Defendant Amboy National Bank's predecessor in-interest was established in 1888 in South Amboy. … The record also clearly supports those conclusions.

Feist v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.

30 N.J. Super. 153 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 20, 1954

It was established that Ambrook was the equitable owner *156 of the stock registered in the name of May M. Feist, and was also the owner of 125 shares registered in its name. … Justice Garrison, speaking for the court, discussed the question as to whether under the statute the qualified right to inspect, theretofore existing at common law, had been transformed into an unqualified right. Mr.

McDonald v. Director, Division of Taxation

10 N.J. Tax 556 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 29, 1989

He had effectively established a domicile in the State of Florida for the year 1985. … Contrary to Pardee , not only was the profit sharing plan established and payments made to plaintiff from it as compensation for services rendered, but they were clearly made in connection with plaintiffs occupation.

Melick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

84 N.J.L. 437 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1913

The meaning of a written contract is determined by the application of established canons to the language employed by the contracting parties. … is void in case of its violation as in the ease of a person previously rejected, or in the case of certain diseases, &c., but in the case of a previous policy in the same company the restriction is not absolute but only qualified

Meta v. TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL AND COUNTY OF CAMDEN

152 N.J. Super. 228 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 11, 1977

Respondents argue they are immune from liability by virtue of N.J.S.A. 59:4-7, which provides: Neither a public entity nor a public employee is liable for an injury caused solely by the effect on the use of streets and highways … Moreover, establishment of a general method of handling snow-storms is a matter of planning.

Muniz v. UNT'D HSP. MED. CENT.

146 N.J. Super. 512 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 23, 1976

Of course, that immunity was judicially terminated, Collopy v. … The prompt legislative response indicates an intent to reassert the principle of immunity but at the same time to meet the more significant objections to immunity voiced by the Supreme Court in Collopy .

State v. Reynolds

65 N.J.L. 424 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 12, 1900

This principle is stated very clearly by the Court of Errors and Appeals in Halsted v. State, 12 Vroom 552 . … By his own agreement he recognizes the company, and his agency of it, and he will not be permitted to claim immunity by sirnpty asserting that it does not exist.

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Psychological Treatment Records)

710 F. Supp. 999 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 4, 1989

Thus, although the concept of the qualified privilege permits courts to uphold or reject privilege claims in light of the particulars of an individual case, the decision to recognize a qualified privilege must still follow … We are aware that privileges do not confer “absolute” or “unqualified” immunity upon *1005 their holders. 8 Lora v.

Matter of Siegel

133 N.J. 162 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 23, 1993

We find, however, that the evidence clearly and convincingly establishes that respondent knowingly misappropriated funds from his partners. Respondent’s repeated deception compels disbarment. … A plainly-wrong act is not immunized because the victims are one’s partners.

Kennedy v. City of Newark

29 N.J. 178 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 16, 1959

The court can intervene only when unreasonableness is clearly established. Plaintiffs have not met that burden. *186 II. … The legislative history quite clearly indicates that with respect to the local service, N. J. S.

Annin's executors v. Vandoren's administrator

14 N.J. Eq. 135 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1861

The limitation over of the legacy, if not paid by his executors, would be clearly good if standing alone. … If the will is to be established, it must be by a bill duly exhibited for that purpose. Until that is done, the title of the party claiming to be executor cannot ■be admitted.

McCran v. Borough of Ocean Grove

96 N.J.L. 158 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 12, 1921

it may deem needful and to appoint such peace officers as may be deemed requisite for the purpose of keeping order within the territory of the association, such officers being clothed with the same power, authority and immunities … to a, given statute, is this: does it clearly appear that the unconstitutional feature'of the statute did1 not constitute an essential motive to its enactment? Hann v. Bedell, 67 N. J. L. 148; Riccio v.

Transport of New Jersey v. Matos

202 N.J. Super. 571 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 29, 1985

The legislative intent to create a public entity is manifest in N.J.S.A. 27:25-4(a) which declares in no uncertain terms: There is hereby established in the Executive Branch of the State Government the New Jersey Transit … The act begins by immunizing the State from all liability in the following broad terms: "Except as otherwise provided by this act, a public entity is not liable for an injury, whether such injury arises out of an act or omission

Levin v. Lewis

179 N.J. Super. 193 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 30, 1981

Respondent is clearly an "automotive repair dealer" within the meaning of the broadly inclusive language of N.J.A.C. 13:45A-7.1. … His business is not limited to commercial or industrial establishments, and the two complainants herein clearly retained his services as individuals.

Bergen Point Iron Works v. Board of Review of Unemployment Compensation Commission

136 N.J.L. 645 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 18, 1948

Eor the unemployment resulting therefrom, he was clearly disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits by reason of the provision of R. … S. 43:21-5 (d), which provides for disqualification “for any week with respect to which it is found that his total unemployment is due to a stoppage of work which exists because of a labor dispute at the factory, establishment

City of New Brunswick v. George Street Playhouse, Inc.

2 N.J. Tax 407 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 20, 1981

In those cases in which a nonprofit status was found, the record clearly revealed a corporation dedicated solely to its stated nonprofit purposes even though some income was realized. … Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that defendant had a money-making objective, which it must do if it is to establish that defendant does not qualify as a corporation not conducted for profit.

ABC Bail Bonds, Inc. v. Grant

459 N.J. Super. 340 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 3, 2019

. *929 Judge Innes found that ABC had not met its burden of proof establishing that the Directive was unconstitutional. … But that constitutional right is clearly qualified by, among other limitations, compliance with the conditions of bail not only by the principal but also by the surety. [ Id. at 451 , 839 A.2d 896 .]

Ensslin v. Board of Trustees

311 N.J. Super. 333 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 11, 1998

Moreover, petitioner’s claims in his litigation could have been used, as effectively, to negate the proposition he was required to establish in order to qualify for an ordinary disability pension. … Clearly, therefore, while the central issue of fact and law in petitioner’s termination proceeding and civil action remained in dispute — through the conclusion of the appellate process — he was effectively precluded from

May v. Cooperman

582 F. Supp. 1458 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 28, 1984

Resonable rates of compensation can readily be established. … The discovery issues raising questions of state legislators’ immunity and the application of the free exercise and establishment clause to enforced moments of silence as distinguished from verbal prayer were novel.