Case law

Browning v. Williams (In Re Silver Wheel Freightlines, Inc.)

64 B.R. 563 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Mar 7, 1986

Nevertheless, the Brownings are entitled to the reasonable rental value of the premises for the post-chapter 11 period of occupancy by the debtor-in-possession. Brown v. … Bivens v. Hancock, 71 Or.App. 273, 279 ; 692 P.2d 153, 157 (1984); Nelson v. Hansen, 278 Or. 571, 578 , 565 P.2d 727, 732 (1977); Dering v. Williams, 378 F.2d 417 (9th Cir.1967).

Robertson-Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 20, 2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON COREY CLARICE ROBERTSON-BROWN, 2:20-cv-01120-AA Plaintiff … Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v.

Paine v. Widing Transportation

59 Or. App. 185 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1982

Claimant’s situation differs from that in Brown v. Jeld-Wen, Inc., 52 Or App 191 , 627 P2d 1291 (1981), in which we held that the claim was prematurely closed. … See Morris v. Denny’s, 50 Or App 533 , 623 P2d 1118 , clarified 53 Or App 863 , 633 P2d 827 (1981). In determining the extent of partial disability, we generally defer to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Owen v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Piper

271 Or. 726 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1975

In Jenkins v. … But see In re DeSaulnier, 360 Mass 787, 279 NE2d 296, 307-08 (1972); Ransford v.

REX - Real Estate Exchange, Inc. v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 9, 2021

Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 350 (1943) (quoting 15 U.S.C. § 1). The Act serves to promote robust competition and suppress “business combinations” that restrain competition. Id. at 351. … Plaintiff alleges no facts supporting an inference that Governor Brown, the Agency, or the Board function as separate economic actors to restrain competition.

Munro-Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 18, 2021

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ROCHELLE MUNRO-BROWN, Case No. 3:20-cv-01283-IM Plaintiff … , ORDER v.

Johnson v. Warm Springs Irrigation Dist.

118 Or. 239 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1926

As stated in Weber v. Jordan Valley Irr. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Nelson v. United Railways Co.

85 Or. 427 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1917

"Whatever may be said as to its competency it was not of sufficient materiality upon which to base a reversal: Brown v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co., 63 Or. 396 ( 128 Pac. 38 ); Schulte v. … Co. v. Wortham, 73 Tex. 25 ( 10 S. W. 741 , 3 L. R. A. 368, and note); Missouri etc. R. Co. v. Sherrill, 32 Tex. Civ. App. 116 ( 72 S. W. 429 ). 3.

State v. Worth

274 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 2015

.”); State v. Baucum, 268 Or App 649 , 664 n 17, 343 P3d 235 (2015) (declining to consider arguments pertaining to specific Brown/O’Key factors that were not raised before the trial court). … Allred v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 278 , 862 P2d 546 (1993). If not judicially imposed, the parole eligibility date was set by the Parole Board. ORS 144.228 (1971); Scott v.

Roberts v. State Unemployment Compensation Commission

215 Or. 100 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1958

Com’n v. Unionville Milling Co., 313 Mich 292 , 21 NW2d 135 ; Michigan Unemployment Comp. Com’n v. Appeal Board, 332 Mich 194 , 50 NW2d 755 ; Chester B. Brown Co. v. … Brown Co. v. United States, 152 F. Supp 803 . In the case at bar the commission found that title to the fruit was retained by the farmers.

State Ex Rel. Pierce v. Slusher

117 Or. 498 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1926

BROWN, J. This is an application for a writ of mandamus, by which it is sought to compel Harley J. … Board of Library Trustees, etc., 136 Cal. 403 , *502 405 ( 69 Pac. 88 ); Ross v. Board of Education, 18 Cal. App. 222 ( 122 Pac. 967 ); Dufton v. Daniels, 190 Cal. 577 ( 213 Pac. 949 ).

State v. Martin

221 Or. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 2, 2008

State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). If those three criteria are satisfied, we must then determine whether to exercise our discretion to consider the error. Ailes v. … Brown, 310 Or at 355 .

Oregon School Employees Ass'n v. Pendleton School District 16R

73 Or. App. 624 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1985

See Bremer v. … For a full discussion as to the “no reasonable employer” test, see Brown v. Oregon College of Education, 52 Or App 251, 254-256 , 628 P2d 410 (1981).

SAIF Corp. v. Lewis

170 Or. App. 201 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 4, 2000

Deluxe Cabinet Works v. … The Board expressly found Stringham’s reasoning and conclusions more persuasive than those of the other doctors who examined claimant. The Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. See Armstrong v.

Patterson v. Portland Smelting Works

35 Or. 96 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1899

Co., 52 Fed. 680 ; Harts v. Brown, 77 Ill. 226 ; Illinois Steel Co. v. O’Donnell, 156 Ill. 624 (47 Am. St. Kep. 245, 41 N. E. 185 ); Forster v. Mullanphy Planing Mill Co., 16 Mo. App. 150 ; Twin Lick Oil Co. v. … . § 4071; Jameson v. Goldwell, 23 Or. 144 ( 31 Pac. 279 ); Jones v. Hale, 32 Or. 465 ( 52 Pac. 311 ); Wilkinson v. Bauerle, 41 N. J. Eq. 635 ( 7 Atl. 514 ). 8.

David v. Brokaw

121 Or. 591 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1927

Eq. 463; McCarthy v. Mutual Relief Assn. of Petaluma, 81 Cal. 584 ( 22 Pac. 933 ); Pifer v. Brown, 43 W. Va. 412 ( 27 S. E. 399 , 49 L. R. A. 497, and extensive note 8, notes in pages 502, 522-524). … Another valuable case is Lawrence v. Springer, 49 N. J. Eq. 289 ( 24 Atl. 933 , 31 Am. St. Rep. 702 ), and valu able note beginning in page 712; Risien v. Brown, 73 Tex. 135 ( 10 S. W. 661 ); Dorris v.

Reynoldson v. Multnomah County

189 Or. App. 327 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 27, 2003

See, e.g., Brown v. … We therefore reverse and remand the case to the board for it to award claimant PPD at the proper rate.

Aikens v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

298 Or. App. 14 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 12, 2019

Castro v. Board of Parole , 232 Or. App. 75 , 83, 220 P.3d 772 (2009). … See King v. Board of Parole , 283 Or.

Drake v. City of Portland

172 Or. 558 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1943

Senior Account Clerk Clerk Brown, Harry W. Account Clerk Clerk Erickson, Selvena M. Junior Clerk Clerk” *577 Simpson is one of the parties to this suit. … The provisions of this Article shall apply to the incumbents of all offices, places and employments in this public service of the City except the following * íf V’ The exemption includes no one involved in this proceeding

Siglin v. Coos Bay Company

35 Or. 79 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1899

v. … Co. v.