Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.00s
Balcom v. Knowledge Learning Enterprises
256 Or. App. 615 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 2013
See State v. … See generally State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (setting forth prerequisites for plain error review); *622 Ailes v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedIn Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Bauer
283 Or. 55 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1978
The Trial Board’s recommendation was: "Recommend That File Be Closed With No Action.” 2 The decision of the Disciplinary Review Board was as follows: "The Disciplinary Review Board, in the form of a panel consisting of [Kenneth … See In re Brown, 277 Or 121, 134 , 559 P2d 884 (1977).
Cited 2 timesPublishedContreras v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
297 Or. App. 469 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 2019
We review the board's order for substantial evidence and reason. Jenkins v. … Board of Parole , 327 Or. 147 , 157, 957 P.2d 1210 (1998) ); see also Washington v. Board of Parole , 294 Or.
Cited 4 timesPublishedIn Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Boyer
295 Or. 624 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1983
Both the Trial Board and Disciplinary Review Board found the accused not to be a credible witness. We agree. A major part of the accused’s practice had been in real estate and contract law. … The Disciplinary Review Board endorsed that recommendation.
Cited 16 timesPublished5 Or. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 1971
As defendant put his hand in his left jacket pocket, the motion spread his outer jacket and Officer Johnson saw some brown leather underneath which appeared to be a brown jacket. … Several of these Negro men boarded a bus wMch departed at about 8:30 p.m. No confrontation between police and any of tMs group occurred at the bus depot.
Cited 16 timesPublishedGarcia v. Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles
195 Or. App. 604 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 2004
See Ensley v. … National Bank v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBrown v. Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 28, 2023
See Thomas v. … .”); United States. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHarry and David v. Workmen's Compensation Bd.
6 Or. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 21, 1971
Moreover, given its mandate from the legislature to make such rules as may be required to manage the fund, we believe the Board acted in a reasonable manner in filling the gap left by the statute. Ore. Newspaper Pub. v. … Bellucci v. Tip Top Farms, Inc., 24 NY2d 416 , 301 NYS2d 14 , 248 NE2d 864 (1969).
Cited 3 timesPublished219 Or. 383 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1959
Kirkland, 298 Ill App 340, 18 NE2d 709 (1939) (statement before county Tax Appeal Board); *389 Kimball v. Ryan, 283 Ill App 456 (1936) (written objections submitted to Election Board); Haskell v. … Stim, 11 Misc2d 653, 176 NYS2d 475 (1958) (affidavit and letter by attorney to presiding Justice); Brown v.
Cited 89 timesPublished120 Or. 501 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1927
(Seal) “Edith Brown Silsby. … L., this recital is conclusive proof as between the parties of a performed contractual consideration: Sutherlin v. Bloomer, 50 Or. 398 ( 93 Pac. 135 ).
Cited 4 timesPublishedCooper v. Eugene School District No. 4J
76 Or. App. 146 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1985
Brown, 366 US 599 , 81 S Ct 1144 , 6 L Ed 2d 563 (1961) (uniform application of Sunday closing laws); Prince v. … Everson v. Board of Education, 330 US 1 , 67 S Ct 504 , 91 L Ed 711 (1947) (Establishment clause); Cantwell v.
Reversed on other grounds by Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986)Cited 4 timesPublishedFinley v. State Industrial Accident Commission
141 Or. 138 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1932
Varrelman v. … Co. v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 472 ( 114 N. E. 915 ), and Barragar v. Ind. Com. of Wis. 205 Wis. 550 ( 238 N. W. 368 , 78 A. L.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRoberts v. Springfield Utility Board
District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 2, 2021
See Ingram v. … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownState Board of Higher Education v. Synod of Oregon of the United Presbyterian Church
243 Or. 352 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1966
ORS 351.190 grants to the Board of Higher Education the right of condemnation in accordance with the provisions of ORS 366.375 to 366.390. … Cottrell v. Prier, 191 Or 571, 575 , 231 P2d 788 ; Barnes v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 112 Or 41, 43 , 228 P 684 ; Graves v.
Cited 3 timesPublished175 Or. 328 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1944
A. 735; Brown v. Brown, 222 Mass. 415 , 111 N. E. 42, 43 ; Bacigalupi v. Bacigalupi, 72 Cal. App. 654 , 238 P. 93 ; annotation, 137 A. L. R. 884. See also, in this connection, Brown v. Brown, 135 Mich. 141 , 97 N. … Brown, 135 Mich. 141 , 97 N. W. 396 .
Cited 25 timesPublishedRoberts v. Springfield Utility Board
District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 9, 2021
See Moonin v. … Dunn v. Castro, 621 F.3d 1196, 1198- 99 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrown v. Service Group of America, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 5, 2022
Brown and his employer, Food Services of America, Inc. (“FSA”). … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011) (quoting Int’l Shoe Co., 326 U.S. at 317).
Cited 0 timesUnknownIn Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Piper
271 Or. 726 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1975
In Jenkins v. … But see In re DeSaulnier, 360 Mass 787, 279 NE2d 296, 307-08 (1972); Ransford v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedWright v. SAIF Corp. (In re Wright)
295 Or. App. 151 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 5, 2018
In Thrifty Payless, Inc. v. … On review, claimant raised a second assignment of error, but concedes that that issue was resolved in Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or 241 , 391 P.3d 773 (2017). We accept claimant's concession.
Cited 0 timesPublishedREX - Real Estate Exchange, Inc. v. Brown
District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 9, 2021
Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 350 (1943) (quoting 15 U.S.C. § 1). The Act serves to promote robust competition and suppress “business combinations” that restrain competition. Id. at 351. … Plaintiff alleges no facts supporting an inference that Governor Brown, the Agency, or the Board function as separate economic actors to restrain competition.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna