Case law

Phillips v. Phillips

40 Me. 160 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1885

Brown v. Veazie, 25 Maine, 359. In this case, Whitman, C.

Farrand v. Redington Memorial Home

270 A.2d 871 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 18, 1970

Monk v. Morton, 139 Me. 291 , 30 A.2d 17 (1943). … Smith, Adm’r v. The Eliza Jennings Home, 176 Ohio St. 351 , 199 N.E.2d 733 (1964); First *874 National Bank of Lawrence v. Methodist Home, 181 Kan. 100 , 309 P.2d 389 (1957); Brydges v.

In Re All Maine Asbestos Litigation

581 F. Supp. 963 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 23, 1984

See Shuman v. United States, slip op. at 5; Brown v. United States, slip op. at 5-6 n. 7. See also Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d at 13 ; Edmonds v. … See Shuman v. United States; Brown v. United States. They are sufficient to withstand the United States’ motion to dismiss.

McNicholas v. York Beach Village Corp.

394 A.2d 264 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 15, 1978

Board of Com’rs. of Newton County v. … Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 314 , 96 S.Ct. 2562, 2567 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520, 525 (1975).

McCaffrey v. Silk

150 Me. 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 12, 1954

Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R.R., 111 Me. 263 , 88 A. 988 (1913); Glazier v. Tetrault, 148 Me. 127 , 90 A. (2nd) 809 (1952). … :Graham, referring to the plan that is on the board, .with the pressure reducing valve here and the relief valve, here as indicated, was there ány protection to excessive heating for this boiler? A.

Very v. McHenry

29 Me. 206 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1848

Brown, 5 East, 124, Lord Ellenborough says, “ the rule was well laid down by Lord Mansfield in Ballantine v. … Russell, 13 Mass. 1 ; Hunter v. Potts, 4 T. R. 182; Smith v. Buchanan, 1 East, 6; Sturgis v. Crowinshield, 4 Wheat. 122; McMillan v. McNiel, ibid. 209 ; Le Roy v. Crowninshield, 2 Mason, 152 , 161, 162; Phillips v.

Coombs v. Hogan

116 Me. 437 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 20, 1917

This is an action of assumpsit for board and lodging furnished Hannah B. Hogan, deceased. It is before the court on a general motion to set aside the jury’s verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Mrs. … Leighton v. Nash, 111 Maine, 525.

Clements

122 Me. 164 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 27, 1922

Taylor v. Brown, 88 Maine, 56; Bradbury v. Warren, 104 Maine, 423 and cases cited. Barry v. Austin, 118 Maine, 51 and cases cited. Gregg v.

Fessenden

77 Me. 98 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 28, 1885

The appellant was devisee in trust and executor under Daniel Brown’s will. … Kimball v. Sumner, 62 Maine, 305 ; Lucy v. Lucy, 55 N. H. 9 ; Palmer v. Palmer, 13 Gray, 328 ; Schoul. Executors, § 510, note. There may be exceptions to the rule.

Wass v. Maine Mutual Marine Insurance

61 Me. 537 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1873

Hopkins for insurance on a cargo of hay, shipped on board schooner Julia, from Dover, N. B., to Boston. … Loss payable to V. D. Wass. Under deck, $800 at li per cent, $4.50. On deck, $300 at 5 per cent, $15.00. GeoRge A. HopiciNS, agent.

Lane v. Townsend

14 F. Cas. 1087 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 17, 1835

Wayman v. Southard, 10 Wheat. [23 U. S.] 1. … Mannin v. Partridge, 14 East, 599; Champion v. Noyes, 2 Mass. 482 . Mr. Justice Story, in delivering the opinion of the court in the case of Beers v.

Palmer v. Portland School Committee

652 A.2d 86 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 6, 1995

See Marxsen v. … Elvin v. City of Waterville, 573 A.2d 381, 383 (Me.1990) (based upon evidence before Board, its decision to dismiss Elvin not irrational or arbitrary).

State v. Caron

334 A.2d 495 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 3, 1975

Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225 (1963) cert. den. sub. nom., Jamison et al. v. Chappell, Chairman, U. S. Board of Parole et al., 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 447 , 11 L.Ed. 2d 316 (1963); Arciniega v. … Under Morrissey v. Brewer and Gagnon v.

Gould v. Ford

91 Me. 146 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 1, 1898

Smith v. Brown, 61 Maine, 70, and cases cited. … Clark v. Metcalf. 38 Maine, 122; Flowers v. Flowers, 45 Maine, 459; Bank v. Lord, 49 Maine, 99; Ross v. Berry, Id. 434; Bell v. Furbush, 56 Maine, 178; Smith v. Brown, 61 Maine, 70.

Fogler v. Buck

66 Me. 205 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 22, 1877

Brown v. Dunham, 11 Gray, 42 . Story Eq., § 317. Atkinson v. Atkinson, 8 Allen, 15 . The conveyance should be to the ward. The property is his. … Moore v. Hazelton, 9 Allen, 102 . The ward is properly a party to the bill, and the ■ conveyance should be to him.

Maine Central Railroad v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes

691 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 29, 1988

See, e.g., Logan v. … In Consolidated Edison Co. v.

Webster v. Bath Iron Works

1998 Me. 222 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 2, 1998

See Parker v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 644 A.2d 1037, 1039-10 (Me.1994). … See e.g., LaPointe v. United Eng’rs & Constructors, 680 A.2d 458, 460 (Me., 1996) (Offset for duplicative state recoveries); Webber v.

Ross v. Hanson

227 A.2d 606 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 29, 1967

In Nichols v. … In Taft v.

Mitchell

133 Me. 81 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 24, 1934

Gerrish v. Nason, 22 Me., 438; Robinson v. Adams, 62 Me., 369; Thomson, Aplt., 92 Me., 563, 43 A., 511 ; American Board of Commissioners, etc., Aplts., 102 Me.,72, 66 A., 215 . … Needham Trust Co. v. Cookson, 251 Mass., 160 ; American Board of Commissioners, etc., Aplts., supra.

Conley v. Inhabitants of Woodville

97 Me. 240 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 1, 1903

Warren v. Islesborough, 20 Maine, 442; Boothby v. Troy, 48 Maine, 560. … In this case the plaintiffs, living in the town of Lincoln, sue the inhabitants of the town of Woodville, for the board of a person having her pauper settlement in the latter town, which board was furnished in .the town where