Case law

Brown v. Megabus Ne., LLC

203 A.3d 768 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 2019

Brown v. Collins

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2010

The complaints against the defendants with the surname Brown allege l Shiron Brown v. Marz'a Robz`nson,' Shiron Brown v. Shirley Randall; Shiron Brown v. F reda Berrz`s; Shz'ron Brown v. … Thomasz`na Brown; Shiron Brown v. James Brown,' and Shiron Brown v. Mz`chelle Boris. also some kind of identity fraud, and contain other unintelligible allegations. See, e.g., Compl., Shiron Brown v.

Squires v. Brown

604 F. Supp. 2d 236 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2009

Co. v. … Segar v.

Brown v. Shimabukuro

118 F.2d 17 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 1941

Affirmed. 1 Young v. Young, 57 App.D.C. 157 , 18 F.2d 807 . Cf. Sacks v. Steeker, 2 Cir., 60 F.2d 73 . A narrower view is sometimes taken. Union Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Thomas, 9 Cir., 83 F. 803 .

Brown v. United States

464 A.2d 120 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1983

Larry Brown said, ‘Why not?’ ” We have no difficulty in concluding that appellant Brown’s statement (“Why not?”) … Brown told him to shut up.” Poston was at that point accusing appellant Brown of a heinous crime.

Brown v. United States

261 A.2d 834 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1970

Lee v. United States, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 156, 157-158 , 221 F.2d 29, 30-31 (1954). See also, Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217, 241 , 80 S.Ct. 683 , 4 L.Ed.2d 668 (1960); Hester v. … Compare United States v. Merritt, 293 F.2d 742 (3rd Cir.1961); Work v. United States, 100 U.S. App.D.C. 237, 243 F.2d 660 (1957); Williams v. United States, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 161 , 237 F.2d 789 (1956).

Brown v. Rudolph

25 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1928

Brown, and in our judgment said Robert W. … Kendall v. Stokes et al., 3 How. 87, 98 , 11 L. Ed. 506 ; Spalding v. Vilas, 161 *542 U. S. 483 , 16 S. Ct. 631 , 40 L. Ed. 780 ; De Arnaud v. Ainsworth, 24 App. D. C. 167, 5 L. E. A. (N. S.) 163; Mellon v.

Brown v. Paulson

597 F. Supp. 2d 67 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2009

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999); Stewart v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 422, 428 (D.C.Cir.2003); Carroll v. England, 321 F.Supp.2d 58, 68 (D.D.C.2004). … Brown, 407 F.Supp.2d at 69 .

Hamrick v. Brusseau

80 F. App'x 116 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 2003

Library of Congress, 750 F.2d 89 , 103 n. 31 (D.C.Cir.1984); Laswell v. Brown, 688 F.2d 261, 268 (8th Cir.1982) (quoting Bivens v. … See Mississippi Industries v. F.E.R.C., 808 F.2d 1525 , 1567 (D.C.Cir.1987) (abuse of discretion standard for reviewing recusal decisions). Pursuant to D.C.Cir. Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.

Brown v. Tomlinson

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2009

BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) … Civil Action No. 03-1376 (PLF) ) BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________

Brown v. Califano

455 F. Supp. 837 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 1978

Plaintiffs’ principal line of attack focuses on the rule established by the Supreme Court in North Carolina State Board of Education v. … As applicable regulations make clear, see 45 C.F.R. §§ 80.8 -.11 (1977), and as prior proceedings in this case confirm, see Brown v.

Banks v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2009

District and Benkruptcy Courts UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Simon Banks, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. § C1v1l Act1on No. w 8 Devon Brown, Director, D.C.

Honeywell International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

253 F.3d 119 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 2001

See Allied Chem. & Alkali Workers v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 404 U.S. 157, 159 (1971); UAW v. NLRB, 765 F.2d 175, 1799-80 (D.C. Cir. 1985). … But the federal courts, not the Board, are legislatively empowered to be the primary inter- preters of contracts. See Litton Fin. Printing Div. v.

Brown v. United States

881 A.2d 586 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2005

Brown v. United States, 840 A.2d 82, 88 (D.C.2004). In general, we have said that “prior consistent statements may not be used to bolster an unimpeached witness.” Daye v. United States, 733 A.2d 321, 325 (D.C.1999). … See, e.g., Brown, 840 A.2d at 88-89 ; Warren, 436 A.2d at 837 ; Morris v. United States, 398 A.2d 333, 338 (D.C.1978).

Brown v. United States

726 A.2d 149 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 1999

See, e.g., Murphy v. Bonanno, 663 A.2d 505, 508-509 (D.C.1995); Portillo v. United States, 609 A.2d 687, 690-91 (D.C.1992); Roundtree v. United States, 581 A.2d 315, 321 (D.C.1990); Sherer v. … Brooks v. United States, 683 A.2d 1369, 1371 (D.C.1995). As the trial court found, Brown’s theory, and the support for it, was speculative.

Brown v. Royall

81 F. Supp. 767 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 1949

I believe that the principle' which controls here is expressly stated by the Supreme Court in the case of Wales v.

Brown v. Christman

126 F.2d 625 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 9, 1942

In Boss v. … Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 22 S.W.2d 701, 703 ; where a check for the entire amount on deposit was accompanied by an assignment and delivery of the deposit slip, Hove v.

Knight v. Mabus

134 F. Supp. 3d 348 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2015

Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (quoting Shehadeh v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co., 595 F.2d 711, 727 (D.C. Cir. 1978)). … Boykin v. England, No. 02-0950, 2003 WL 21788953, at *5 (D.D.C. July 16, 2003) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

Western Coal Traffic League,petitioners v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Intervenors

216 F.3d 1168 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 14, 2000

Given the Board’s “special cognizance” over the railroad industry, National Motor Freight Traffic Ass’n v. … Fruit Growers Ass'n v. Martin, 968 F.2d 1265, 1272 (D.C.Cir.1992); see also Forester v. Consumer Prod.

Brown v. Green

767 F. Supp. 273 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 1991

Brown was carrying. … See, e.g., Schleier v.