Case law

Nelson v. Baker

112 Or. 79 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1924

In the case of Ham v. Boston Board of Police, 142 Mass. 90 , at page 93 [ 7 N. … J. and Brown and Rand, JJ., concur. For the motion, Mr. Franh S. Grant and Mr. B. A. Imlay. Contra, Mr. John Manning.

Karn Et Ux v. Pidcock Et Ux

225 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1960

This general rule has been approved and applied in many Oregon cases since Scott v. Walton, supra, was decided. Ross v. Carlyle et ux., 216 Or 576 , 339 *411 P2d 1114; Brown et ux. v. … Brown et ux. v. Hassenstab et ux., supra; Weiss and Hamilton v. Gumbert, 191 Or 119 , 227 P2d 812 , 228 P2d 800 ; Sharkey v. Burlingame Co., 131 Or 185 , 282 P 546 .

Astleford v. Saif Corp.

122 Or. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1993

Consequently, the order became final, and neither the Board nor we can review it. ORS 656.740(1) and (3); 3 Brown v. Bunch Tire Bailer, Inc., 73 Or App 250, 254 , 698 P2d 522 (1985). … In Trojan Concrete v.

State v. Marrington

335 Or. 555 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2003

Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995). … See Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 331 Or 285, 304 , 14 P3d 596 (2000) (scientific evidence subject to requirements of Brown and O’Key even though science involved is not “hard” science). In State v.

Shaw v. Oswego Iron Co.

10 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1882

Chambers, 3 Ohio, 496; Benner v. Platter, 6 id., 505; Blanchard v. Porter, 11 id., 138; Walker v. Board of Public Works, 16 id., 540; June v. Purcell, 36 Ohio St., 396 ; Middleton v. … Prichard, 3 Scam., 510 ; Board of Trustees v. Hamen, 5 Gilman, 548 ; City of Chicago v. Laflin, 49 Ill., 117 ; Braxton v. Brusler, 64 Ill., 488 ; *380 Browne v. Kennedy, 5 H. & J., 195 ; Schurmeier v.

Ray v. Oregon Ex Rel. Construction Contractors Board (In Re Ray)

355 B.R. 253 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Nov 29, 2006

Relying on Perez v. … Lee v. State of Washington, et al.

Littell v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Higher Education (In Re Littell)

6 B.R. 85 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Aug 21, 1980

Fales v. Multnomah County

119 Or. 127 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1926

Bank v. Yamhill County, 110 Or. 74 ( 222 Pac. 1077 ); see, also, Brown v. Silverton, 97 Or. 441, 451 ( 190 Pac. 971 ). … See Clark v. Hood River County, 73 Or. 336, 340 ( 143 Pac. 897 ).

Siring v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education ex rel. Eastern Oregon University

977 F. Supp. 2d 1058 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 15, 2013

Rosemary Siring (“Plaintiff’ or “Siring”) brings this lawsuit against Oregon State Board of Higher Education, acting by and through Eastern Oregon University (“Defendant” or “EOU”). … University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v.

Barrett v. Coast Range Plywood

56 Or. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 1982

Claimant cites no statute or Board Rule for that proposition. Penalties and fees can be awarded only when expressly authorized by statute. Brown v. EBI Companies, 289 Or 905 , 618 P2d 959 (1980); Morgan v. … Williams v.

Green v. Hayward

23 Or. App. 310 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 1975

Brown, 54 Or 7 , 101 P 900 (1909). See also, Fasano v. Washington Co. Comm., 264 Or 574 , 507 P2d 23 (1973), and Baker v. City of Milwaukie, 271 Or 500 , 533 P2d 772 (1975). … Baker v. City of Milwaukie, supra.

Hutchison v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

118 Or. App. 288 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 17, 1993

In Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 591 , 763 P2d 408 (1988), we said: *291 “Whether a denial is reasonable or unreasonable involves both legal and factual questions. … See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Arms, 106 Or App 343, 347 , 807 P2d 331 (1991); Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, supra, 93 Or App at 592 .

Matthews v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education ex rel. University of Oregon

332 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 2001

Matthews v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education, 220 F3d 1165 , 1166 (9th Cir 2000). … Matthews v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education, 220 F3d 1165 , 1167 (9th Cir 2000).

Bullock v. City of Ashland

241 Or. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 9, 2011

In Home Builders Assn. v. … The court held in School District No. 3J v.

School District No. 1 v. School District No. 45

148 Or. 554 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1934

Appealing defendants also cite the case of Board of Supervisors v. Brown, 146 Miss. 56 ( 111 So. 831 ). … Brown, supra.

Draper v. Astoria School District No. 1C

995 F. Supp. 1122 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 12, 1998

See Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Shockey v. … Defendants’ reliance upon Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997), is misplaced.

Naught v. Gamble, Inc./Pepsi Cola, Inc.

87 Or. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1987

Brown v. EBI Companies, 289 Or 455 , 616 P2d 457 (1980); Sekermestrovich v. SAIF, 280 Or 723 , 573 P2d 275 (1977); Anderson v. … Cogswell v. SAIF, 74 Or App 234, 237 , 702 P2d 81 (1985). He has failed to meet that burden. The Board properly ruled that the referee lacked jurisdiction to hear the lower back claim.

Dreifus Lumber Co. v. Werner

221 Or. 467 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1960

Brown et ux. v. Hassenstab et ux., 212 Or 246, 253 , 319 P2d 929 ; Johnson et ux. v. Cofer, 204 Or 142, 149 , 281 P2d 981 ; Sharkey v. Burlingame Co., 131 Or 185, 197 , 282 P 546 . … See also Larsen et al. v.

Sisters of St. Joseph of Peace, Health, & Hospital Services v. Russell

122 Or. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 1993

Board. … Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984). At issue is the nature of plaintiffs claims.

Sheridan v. Johnson Creek Market

127 Or. App. 259 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1994

As we said in SAIF v. … Brown, 127 Or App 253 , 873 P2d 326 (1994), ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) does not provide a procedural mechanism for the denial of an accepted claim.