Case law

Neuhaus v. Federico

12 Or. App. 314 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1973

Thus, we begin by considering the extent of a school board’s authority in this context. A school board, like any other agency of government, has only that authority granted by statute. Monaghan v. … Stull v. School Board of Western Beaver Jr.-Sr. H.S., 459 F2d 339 (3rd Cir 1972); Massie v. Henry, 455 F2d 779 (4th Cir 1972); Bishop v. Colaw, 450 F2d 1069 (8th Cir 1971); Richards v. Thurston, supra; Breen v.

SAIF Corp. v. Cessnun

161 Or. App. 367 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 7, 1999

See also Brown v. A-Dec, Inc., 154 Or App 244, 247 , 961 P2d 280 (1998) (applying the provisions of ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) “in determining the compensability of an occupational disease”). … In Medford Corp. v.

SAIF v. Coria

315 Or. App. 546 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 2021

against the insurer under an imputed knowledge theory”; and (4) Anfilofieff v. … Pacific Skyline, Inc., 266 Or App 676, 681, 338 P3d 791 (2014) (citing Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 591, 763 P2d 408 (1988)).

Crandon Capital Partners Ex Rel. Willamette Industries v. Shelk

202 Or. App. 537 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 2005

For example, in Tanner v. … Id. at 510 ; accord Safeway, Inc. v.

State v. O'Key

321 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1995

4 Similarly, in Plemel v. Walter, 303 Or 262 , 735 P2d 1209 (1987), this court applied State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), in a civil case. … State v. Clowes, 310 Or 686 , 692 n 7, 801 P2d 789 (1990); Brown, 297 Or at 420 n 7.

Tinsley v. Lombard

46 Or. 9 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1904

Brown, 23 Cal. 142 ; Cartwright v. Cartwright, 68 Ill. App. 74 ; Board v. Presbyterian Church, 19 Wash. 455 ( 53 Pac. 671 ); Ewell v. Daggs, 108 U. S. 143 (2 Sup. Ct. 408); Sanger v. Nightingale, 122 U. S. 176 (7 Sup. … Ct. 1109); Blair v. Silver Peak Mines (C. C.), 84 Fed. 737 ; Hanchett v. Blair, 100 Fed. 817 ( 41 C. C. A. 76 ).

American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. State Board of Higher Education

31 Or. App. 251 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 24, 1977

Central Illinois Public Service Company, 324 F2d 916, 918-19 (7th Cir 1963); National Labor Relations Board v. Hart Cotton Mills, 190 F2d 964, 972 (4th Cir 1951); R. Gorman, Labor Law 500-01 (1976). … The ERB, quoting the following language from Labor Board v.

Forman v. Clatsop County

63 Or. App. 617 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1983

Forman, Appellants, v. CLATSOP COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Oregon; Sports Acres, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; Milton O. Brown and Raymond Kittleson, Respondents. No. CC-82-156; CA A24527. … Timothy V. Ramis, Portland, argued the cause for respondents Sports Acres, Inc., Milton O. Brown and Raymond Kittleson. With him on the brief was O'Donnell, Sullivan & Ramis, Portland.

Kay v. David Douglas School District No. 40

79 Or. App. 384 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 21, 1986

Brown v. Western R. of Alabama, 338 US 294, 296 , 70 S Ct 105 , 94 L Ed 2d (1949). Here, however, we are not prepared to say that the right to attorney fees under section 1988 is strictly a matter of procedure. … In Brown v.

Zinser-Rankin v. SAIF Corp. (In re Zinser-Rankin)

293 Or. App. 601 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 2018

We affirmed in our per curiam opinion, citing Fillinger v. The Boeing Co. , 290 Or.App. 187 , 413 P.3d 989 (2018). … That argument is contrary to the express statement in Fillinger that, under Brown v.

Tuckenberry v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

291 Or. App. 843 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 16, 2018

Gerdetz v. Central Oregon Irr. Co.

83 Or. 576 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1917

In Smith v. Boston & Maine R. R. … In Brown v.

Edwards v. Wirtz

167 Or. 625 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1941

Co. v. Frost, 146 Ark. 472 , 225 S. W. 645 ; Old Second Nat’l Bank *638 v. Alpena County Sav. Bank, supra; Chicago Blvd. Land Co. v. Apartment Garages, 245 Mich. 448 , 222 N. W. 697 . … Grider v. Turn-how, supra.

Murphy v. Electrical and Elevator Board

338 Or. App. 448 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 2025

an abuse of dis- cretion,” Sachdev v. … We are unpersuaded that the board abused its discretion. “[T]here is often more than one legally permissible choice when discretion is at play.” Dept. of Human Services v. T. J.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hereford

306 Or. 69 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1988

ORS g^O). 1 The first and second causes relate to representation of clients named McKee and Brown. … On these claims, the trial panel found: “The direct testimony of both McKee and Brown established that the Accused was less than diligent in maintaining communications with, and failed to promote understanding with, these

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Paulson

346 Or. 676 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 2009

See generally State v. … See, e.g., City of Mapel Heights v.

Ellis v. Employment Division

25 Or. App. 719 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 1976

In Minniti v. … Accord: Henderson v. Employment Div., 22 Or App 378 , 539 P2d 665 (1975). In Brown v. Employment Division, 22 Or App 382 , 539 P2d 666 (1975), and Bird v.

Gilbert v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

63 Or. App. 320 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 1, 1983

Uris v. Compensation Department, 247 Or 420 , 427 P2d 753 (1967). Our view rests in significant measure on the opinion of Dr. … While it is true that the force of his opinion is somewhat diminished because it rests heavily on claimant’s unreliable description of the 1977 injury, Miller v.

Ivy Ramsey v. Wellington Co.

114 Or. 355 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1925

See, also, Wilson v. Investment Co., 80 Or. 233 ( 156 Pac. 249 ); Bell & Co. v. Vogt, 87 Or. 102 ( 168 Pac. 724 ). … See, also, McKinney v. Hindman, 86 Or. 545 ( 169 Pac. 93 , 1 A. L. R. 1476).

Flores v. SAIF Corp.

237 Or. App. 645 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 2010

Carreon v. Commerce & Industry Ins. Co., 233 Or App 440 , 226 P3d 73 (2010).