Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,550 results
6.30s
58 Me. 439 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1870
In Brown v. … Brown v. Atwood, 7 Greenl. 356.
Cited 3 timesPublished71 Me. 309 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1880
New Orleans v. Wardens, etc., 11 La. An. 244. … First Baptist Church v. R. R. Co. 5 Barb. 79 , and cases there cited.
Cited 10 timesPublished117 Me. 194 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1918
From the photographs introduced in the case it appears that the sides and ends of the building were boarded down to the ground or, as the plaintiff’s father stated, “it was boarded from the ground to the eaves.” … Russell v. M. C. R. R., 100 Maine, 406; McClain v. Caribou National Bank, 100 Maine, 437; Moffatt v. Kenny, 174 Mass., 311 .
Cited 10 timesPublished157 Me. 355 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 13, 1961
In November, 1959 the joint board had entertained the issue of damages and had rendered their decisions on November 24, A. D. 1959. The joint board by registered mail dated December 3, A. … Hayford v. Bangor, 103 Me. 434, 437 .)
Cited 1 timesPublished284 A.2d 288 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 8, 1971
Commonwealth v. Certain Gambling Implements, 317 Mass. 160 , 57 N.E.2d 542 (1944); Cooper v. Miami, 160 Fla. 656 , 36 So.2d 195 (1948); James v. … Koller v. Duggan, 346 Mass. 270 , 191 N.E.2d 475 (1963); Hackett v. Gale, 104 N.H. 90 , 179 A.2d 451 (1962); Butler Fair and Agricultural Assn. v. Butler School District, 389 Pa. 169 , 132 A.2d 214 (1957).
Cited 7 timesPublished953 A.2d 1146 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 24, 2008
Both the employer who accepts the claim and files a memorandum of payment, thus establishing a payment scheme, see Valliere v. Workers’ Comp. … Farris v.
Cited 0 timesPublished115 Me. 344 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 29, 1916
Curtis, appointed the said Henry Gilman as a member of said board of dental examiners, to fill the vacancy in *346 said board arising by reason of the expiration of the term of office of the relator, Will S. … As said by the court in State v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedVictor S. Urrutia v. Interstate Brands International
179 A.3d 312 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 8, 2018
See Labbe v. … In LaRochelle v.
Cited 13 timesPublished68 Me. 195 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 8, 1878
Reddick v. Smith, 4 Illinois, 451. Dawson v. Holbrook, 1 Ohio, 135. Crane v. Freese, 1 Harrison, (N. J.) 305. Conant v. Bicknell, 1 D. Chipman, (Vt.) 50. Farmers' Bank v. Beaston, 7 Gill & Johnson, (Md.) 421. Jones v. … Thompson v. Brown, 17 Pick. 462 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedGilman v. Dwelling-House Insurance
81 Me. 488 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 23, 1889
Brown, 10 Maine, 49, 51; Little v. Thurston, 58 Maine, 86, 88, and the cases there cited; Ockington v. Law, 66 Maine, 551. … Co. v. Brown, 43 N. Y. 396 ; Buck v. Phœnix Ins. Co., 76 Maine, 586, 588; Walsh v. Phila. Fire Association, 127 Mass. 383, 385 ; Tyler v. Ætna Ins. Co., 12 Wend. 507 . In the case of Fowle v. Springfield Ins.
Cited 6 timesPublished668 A.2d 879 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 19, 1995
Id.; see also Hall v. Hall, 106 Me. 389, 391 , 76 A. 705 (1910); Brown v. Dickey, 106 Me. 97, 103 , 75 A. 382 (1909). … O’Neill, 527 A.2d at 324 (citing Bean v.
Cited 6 timesPublished53 Me. 206 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1865
Brower v. Fisher, 4 Johns. Ch., 441 . In this case, Chancellor Eest says that, the presumption is a reasonable one, and that a special examination to repel the inference of imbecility seems always to have been required. … See also 1 Greenl. on Ev., § 366, and 2 Kent’s Com., 452, (Little & Brown’s Ed. 609,) and authorities there cited.
Cited 2 timesPublished48 Me. 539 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1861
In Taylor v. … Mon., 219 , and in Kountz v. Brown, 16 B. Mon., 577 . So, too, is the law in North Carolina. Loivder v. Henson, 4 Jones, (law,) 369.
Cited 7 timesPublished770 A.2d 630 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 24, 2001
Brown, 1998 ME 129, ¶ 6 , 712 A.2d 513, 516 (quoting State v. … See, e.g., Brown, 1998 ME 129, ¶ 8 , 712 A.2d at 516 (finding that the number of the offenses charged “alone is not dispositive of the joinder issue”); State v.
Cited 16 timesPublished956 A.2d 88 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 7, 2008
Moen v. … Danforth v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedBureau of Taxation v. Town of Madison
541 A.2d 939 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 1988
Faucher v. City of Auburn, 465 A.2d 1120, 1124 (Me.1983). … (citing Seven Islands Land Co. v. Maine Land Use Regulation Comm’n, 450 A.2d 475, 480 (Me.1982).
Cited 0 timesPublished80 Me. 31 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 4, 1888
Hathorn v. Eaton, 70 Maine, 219. … S., c. 17, § 12; Brown v. Watson, 47 Maine, 161 ; Dudley v. Kennedy, 63 Maine, 465 ; and from the person maintaining it after, request to abate it. Pillsbury v. Moore, 44 Maine, 154.
Cited 5 timesPublished88 Me. 376 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 23, 1896
M’Culloch, 10 Mass. 70 , and Wales v. Stetson, supra. This doctrine is the logic of Dyer v. Curtis, 72 Maine, 181; Holmes v. Corthell, 80 Maine, 31; James v. Wood, 82 Maine, 173; Lancey v. … Clifford, 54 Maine 487 ; Gerrish v. *381 Brown, 51 Maine, 256; Veazie v. Dwinel, 50 Maine, 487; Knox v. Chaloner, 42 Maine, 157, and Brown v. Chadbourne, 31 Maine, 9.
Cited 0 timesPublished130 Me. 417 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 14, 1931
Hammatt v. Emerson, 27 Me., 308, 326; Pratt v. Philbrook, 33 Me., 17, 22; Long v. Woodman, 58 Me., 49, 52; Braley v. Powers, 92 Me., 203; Atlas Shoe Company v. Bechard, 102 Me., 197; Eastern Trust & Banking Company v. … S., Chap. 91, Sec. 28; Cameron v. Tyler, 71 Me., 27; State v. Brown, 75 Me., 456; Copeland v. Hewett, 93 Me., 554. These exceptions being sustained, the writs are left with legally insufficient declarations.
Cited 9 timesPublishedCity of Augusta v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway
114 Me. 24 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 7, 1915
Said board may require the officers of the railroad company and of the municipality to attend a hearing in the matter, after such notice of the hearing to. all parties in interest as said board may deem proper. … By the allegation in the petition, which, on a motion to dismiss must be taken to be true, Rines v. Portland, 93 Maine, 227, it appears that the parties in this case adopted the voluntary method.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna