Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

3.07s

  • Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. National Mediation Board

    220 F. Supp. 730 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 1963

    The National Mediation Board intends to proceed immediately with the election. … The proper forum for determination of the issue of carrier interference would appear to be the National Mediation Board. Counsel for defendant asserts that the Board has conducted an “adequate investigation.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Asher Candy, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    258 F. App'x 334 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 27, 2007

    RC Aluminum Indus., Inc. v. NLRB, 326 F.3d 235, 239 (D.C.Cir.2003). “Not all four criteria must be satisfied for the Board to find a single employer.” Id. First, the Companies concede common ownership. … Honeywell Int’l, Inc. v. NLRB, 253 F.3d 125, 127, 131 (D.C.Cir.2001). When Sherwood acquired Asher, Sherwood assumed the severance terms of Asher’s 1999-2002 collective bar *335 gaining contract.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • RC Aluminum Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    326 F.3d 235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 2003

    See NLRB v. L.B. Priester & Son, Inc., 669 F.2d 355, 359 (5th Cir. 1982). Nevertheless the Board has long construed ‘‘employer unit’’ to allow them, Int’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local Union No. 68, AFL–CIO v. … Cir. 1971), and multi-employer bargaining is well-established, Brown v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • North American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    237 F.2d 209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 13, 1956

    American Airlines, Inc., v. North American Airlines, Inc., 351 U.S. 79 , 76 S.Ct. 600, 602 ; on remand, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 366 , 235 F.2d 863 . . … Continental Southern Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 352, 358 , 197 F.2d 397, 403 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Morall v. Drug Enforcement Administration

    412 F.3d 165 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 2005

    Natural Gas Co. v. … See Gulf Power Co. v.

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

    527 F.2d 803 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1975

    order guidelines established in NLRB v. … See, e. g., NLRB v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemicals, 473 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1973); NLRB v. WKRG-TV, Inc., 470 F.2d 1302 (5th Cir. 1973).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Trans International Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    432 F.2d 607 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 1970

    Eastern-National v. … American Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 120 , 125, 348 F.2d 349 , 354 (1965). See also American Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 6 , 365 F.2d 939 (1966). 4 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Nacs v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    958 F. Supp. 2d 85 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 2013

    See United States v. … ."); Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994) ("Ambiguity is a creature not of definitional possibilities but of statutory context .... "); S. Cal. Edison Co. v. FERC, 195 F.3d 17,24 (D.C.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • James W. Josey v. United States Board of Parole

    320 F.2d 730 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 1963

    In Hyser et al. v. … Hyser v. Reed et al., supra, 318 F.2d at 245 . The case will be remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion and the opinion in Hyser, et al. Reversed and remanded.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Willamette Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    144 F.3d 877 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 26, 1998

    We grant wide deference to. the Board’s unit determinations, mindful as we are, that the Board is not obliged to select *879 the most appropriate unit but only an appropriate unit. American Hosp. Ass’n v. … And because that factor was so important, its diminution causes a 180° turn in policy with no Board explanation. This will not do. See Drug Plastics & Glass Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Shay v. United States

    212 F.2d 809 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 19, 1954

    Of the several contentions raised on these appeals, the only one that would otherwise require discussion relates to the form and execution of search warrants and is answered by Ledbetter v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen v. Surface Transportation Board

    457 F.3d 24 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 2006

    Nutrition Inst. v. … Norfolk & Western Railway v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Washington Pension Union v. Subversive Activities Control Board

    322 F.2d 398 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1963

    This is another of the cases referred to in Labor Youth League v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 1 *decided April 25, 1963. … Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1 , 81 S.Ct. 1857 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961). 4 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Leblanc v. United States Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2025

    Union v. … ”); United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eagle Maintenance Services, Inc. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board

    893 A.2d 569 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 2006

    As this court said in Belcon, Inc. v. … Eagle's reliance on John Reiner & Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Clair Aero, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board

    223 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 2007

    Tourism Board while their Part 135 operating license was suspended. … Agency precedent also indicates “[kjnowingly operating an aircraft while under suspension is one of the most serious violations an airman can commit,” Administrator v. Darst, NTSB Order No.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Orient Express Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

    484 F.3d 554 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 2007

    Given our respect for the Transportation Board’s judgment in these matters, see Ass’n of Am. R.Rs. v. Surface Transp. … Although the Interstate Commerce Act does not define “common carrier,” the Transportation Board’s definition is the standard one. See Fla. Power & Light Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Air Transport Ass'n of America, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

    719 F. Supp. 2d 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2010

    Continental Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board 793 F.Supp. at 334 n. 5. … Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943); *36 Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    494 F.2d 1118 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 20, 1974

    World Airways, Inc. v. CAB, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 3, 6 , 447 F.2d 377, 380 (1971). See also North Central Airlines, Inc. v. … Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc., 412 U.S. 609 , 93 S.Ct. 2469 , 37 L.Ed.2d 207 (1973). See also FPC v. Texaco, Inc., 377 U.S. 33, 39 , 84 S.Ct. 1105 , 12 L.Ed.2d 112 (1964) ; United States v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Rhema Christian Center v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    515 A.2d 189 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1986

    Bright v. … Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. Rockmatt Corp., 231 So.2d 41, 44 (Fla.App.1970) (res judicata); Easley v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.