Case law

Thurber v. Bill Martin Chevrolet, Inc.

487 A.2d 631 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 7, 1985

E.g., Rogers v. Brown, 135 Me. 117 , 190 A. 632 (1937). Our purpose, in the final analysis, is to determine the meaning that the Legislature intended its words to have. Alpha Rho Zeta v. … Rogers v. Brown, 135 Me. at 119 , 190 A. at 633 .

Damers v. Trident Fisheries Co.

119 Me. 343 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 25, 1920

In Clark v. … In Russell v.

Burton v. Thompson

147 Me. 299 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1952

See also Mather v. Cunningham, 107 Me. 242, 78 A. 102 ; Libby v. Water Co., 125 Me. 144 , 131 A. 862 ; Cheney v. Richards, 130 Me. 288 , 155 A. 642 ; Rogers v. … Brown, 134 Me. 88 , 181 A. 667 ; and Associated Fish Products Co. v. Hussey, 145 Me. 388 , 71 A. (2nd) 519.

State v. Worthing

31 Me. 62 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1849

State v. Burlingham & al. 15 Maine, 104; Griffin v. Brown, 2 Pick. 304 . Even m a collateral proceeding, if her testimony would be the means of discord and contention between her and her husband, it would be rejected. … The People v. Bill, 10 Johns. 94 ; Gilmore v. Bowden & al. 3 Faif. 412; Commonwealth v. Marsh & al. 10 Pick. 57 . But the wife is not a party to the record, and therefore does not fall within the rule.

Gilder v. Mitchell

668 A.2d 879 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 19, 1995

Id.; see also Hall v. Hall, 106 Me. 389, 391 , 76 A. 705 (1910); Brown v. Dickey, 106 Me. 97, 103 , 75 A. 382 (1909). … O’Neill, 527 A.2d at 324 (citing Bean v.

Ciampi v. Hannaford Bros. Co.

681 A.2d 4 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 26, 1996

v. … Clark v. Rust Eng’g Co., 595 A.2d 416, 419 (Me.1991). See also Fletcher v.

Pike v. Dilling

48 Me. 539 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1861

In Taylor v. … Mon., 219 , and in Kountz v. Brown, 16 B. Mon., 577 . So, too, is the law in North Carolina. Loivder v. Henson, 4 Jones, (law,) 369.

Higgins v. H.P. Hood, Inc.

926 A.2d 1176 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 24, 2007

The enhanced weight given to the IME’s opinion is designed “to prevent ‘doctor shopping’ and to reduce litigation,” Lydon v. … The hearing officer’s decision must be filed in the office of the board and a copy, attested by the clerk of the board, mailed promptly to all parties interested or to the attorney of record of each party.

Wheeler v. Wheeler

33 Me. 347 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1851

By that conveyance Whittier would not obtain a legal title to the share of the house owned by the intestate, according to the cases of Russell v. Richards, and Hilborn v. Brown. … Wilson v. Reed, 3 Johns. 175 ; Weld v. Oliver, 21 Pick. 559 ; Dain v. Cowing, 22 Maine, 347.

Gilman v. Dwelling-House Insurance

81 Me. 488 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 23, 1889

Brown, 10 Maine, 49, 51; Little v. Thurston, 58 Maine, 86, 88, and the cases there cited; Ockington v. Law, 66 Maine, 551. … Co. v. Brown, 43 N. Y. 396 ; Buck v. Phœnix Ins. Co., 76 Maine, 586, 588; Walsh v. Phila. Fire Association, 127 Mass. 383, 385 ; Tyler v. Ætna Ins. Co., 12 Wend. 507 . In the case of Fowle v. Springfield Ins.

Bureau of Taxation v. Town of Madison

541 A.2d 939 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 1988

Faucher v. City of Auburn, 465 A.2d 1120, 1124 (Me.1983). … (citing Seven Islands Land Co. v. Maine Land Use Regulation Comm’n, 450 A.2d 475, 480 (Me.1982).

Clegg v. American Airlines, Inc.

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 30, 2024

Brown v. United Airlines, Inc., 720 F.3d 60, 63 (1st Cir. 2013). … See McDonald v.

Corthell v. Holmes

88 Me. 376 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 23, 1896

M’Culloch, 10 Mass. 70 , and Wales v. Stetson, supra. This doctrine is the logic of Dyer v. Curtis, 72 Maine, 181; Holmes v. Corthell, 80 Maine, 31; James v. Wood, 82 Maine, 173; Lancey v. … Clifford, 54 Maine 487 ; Gerrish v. *381 Brown, 51 Maine, 256; Veazie v. Dwinel, 50 Maine, 487; Knox v. Chaloner, 42 Maine, 157, and Brown v. Chadbourne, 31 Maine, 9.

Winston v. Maine Technical College System

631 A.2d 70 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 1, 1993

In Bradley v. … Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, 416 U.S. at 711 , 94 S.Ct. at 2016. Neither of those exceptions applies here. 8 .

Oliver v. Berry

53 Me. 206 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1865

Brower v. Fisher, 4 Johns. Ch., 441 . In this case, Chancellor Eest says that, the presumption is a reasonable one, and that a special examination to repel the inference of imbecility seems always to have been required. … See also 1 Greenl. on Ev., § 366, and 2 Kent’s Com., 452, (Little & Brown’s Ed. 609,) and authorities there cited.

Murray v. Waite

113 Me. 485 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 24, 1915

Benner v. Payson, 110 Maine, 204; Libby v. English, 110 Maine, 449. Petition dismissed without costs.” And from this decision the respondent appealed. … In discussing this statute in Libby v.

Weeks v. State

250 A.2d 827 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 1969

State, 136 Me. 322 , 9 A.2d 129 , 125 A.L.R. 602 ; State v. McKrackern, 141 Me. 194 , 41 A.2d 817 ; State v. Bey, 161 Me. 23, 26 , 206 A.2d 413 ; and the form of the indictment has been held sufficient in Lemay v. … See State v. Kopelow, 126 Me. 384 , 138 A. 625 ; State v. Smith 67 Me. 328 .

Niles v. Phinney

90 Me. 122 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 30, 1897

Todd v. Whitney, 27 Maine, 480. There is no evidence to warrant the inference that this consideration was ever impaired or modified by any act of the plaintiff. … Manning v. Brown, 10 Maine, 49; Shaw v. Wise, Id. 113; Little v. Thurston, 58 Maine, 86; Cook v. Walker, 70 Maine, 235; Newhall v. Ins. Co., 52 Maine, 180. Exceptions overruled.

Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central Railroad

281 F. Supp. 2d 311 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 11, 2003

(the “Board”). … claims hinder the Board’s resolution of Defendants’ Petition for Reconsideration.

Farris v. SHINSEKI

762 F. Supp. 2d 141 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 11, 2011

Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984)) (brackets in First Circuit opinion). … That she was unfamiliar with Board regulations, in and of itself, is not an excuse for failure to comply with section 10(b)’s requirements. Id. (citations omitted) (NLRB case). Similarly, in Lopez v.