Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.39s
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Mar 10, 2015
Rickels v. State, 202 S.W.3d 759, 763–64 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (quoting Scamardo v. State, 517 S.W.2d 293, 298 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974)); Silber v. State, 371 S.W.3d 605, 611 (Tex. App. … Evelyn V. Keyes Justice Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Cited 0 timesPublished481 Mass. 1104 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 24, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text272 So. 3d 892 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 3, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text9 C.M.A. 252 · United States Court of Military Appeals · May 16, 1958
The Government’s position was based upon the cases of United *254 States v Gallagher, 7 USCMA 506 , 22 CMR 296 ; United States v Johnson, 6 USCMA 320 , 20 CMR 36 ; and United States v Solinsky, 2 USCMA 153 , 7 CMR 29 . … United States v Burns, 2 USCMA 400 , 9 CMR 30 .
Cited 14 timesPublished821 S.E.2d 314 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text201 A.3d 877 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text462 Md. 560 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 22, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textCommonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Brown
216 Pa. Super. 740 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1969
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text108 A.3d 1201 · Supreme Court of Delaware · Jan 23, 2015
We find that Brown’s first claim has no merit. Under United States v. … Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150 (1972). Compare McCann v.
Cited 123 timesPublished295 Or. App. 143 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 21, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text464 Md. 19 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 21, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text125 A.D.3d 1389 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 6, 2015
Family Court properly concluded that the standard to be applied in determining the location of visitation is the best interests of the child (see Matter of Gold v Gold, 53 AD3d 485, 488 [2008]). … NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; see Matter of Reinhardt v Hardison, 122 AD3d 1448, 1449 [2014]).
Cited 40 timesPublished209 A.3d 526 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textGreater Bridgeport Transit District v. State Board of Labor Relations
232 Conn. 57 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jan 31, 1995
Therefore, the board did not have to defer to arbitration. Fourth, the court relied on Levinson v. … See Board of Police Commissioners v.
Cited 23 timesPublished274 So. 3d 1058 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 2, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text295 Or. App. 669 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 9, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text122 N.E.3d 472 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textSargent v. Zoning Board of Appeals
236 Conn. App. 269 · Connecticut Appellate Court · Nov 11, 2025
App. 1 Sargent v. Zoning Board of Appeals GREGORY SARGENT v. … See L & G Associates, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, supra, 787–88; Fleet National Bank v. Zoning Board of Appeals, supra, 137, 140–41; see also Anatra v. Zoning Board of Appeals, supra, 742– 43.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna