Case law

Greater Bridgeport Transit District v. State Board of Labor Relations

232 Conn. 57 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jan 31, 1995

Therefore, the board did not have to defer to arbitration. Fourth, the court relied on Levinson v. … See Board of Police Commissioners v.

Com. v. Brown

209 A.3d 503 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 2019

Com. v. Brown

209 A.3d 494 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 2019

State v. Brown

821 S.E.2d 314 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2018

Brown and Brown v. Reinagel

35 So. 3d 29 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Dec 9, 2008

Brown v. State

462 Md. 560 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 22, 2019

Brown v. State

441 P.3d 82 · Nevada Supreme Court · May 15, 2019

Brown v. State

129 N.E.3d 807 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2019

People v. Brown

148 A.D.3d 1705 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 24, 2017

Following the preparation of a risk assessment instrument by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (Board), the court conducted a hearing during which defense counsel argued, among other things, that defendant should not … , 133 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2015]; People v Leach, 106 AD3d 1387, 1388 [2013]; People v Felice, 100 AD3d 609, 610 [2012]).

State v. Brown

295 Or. App. 523 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 2018

National Labor Relations Board v. Consolidated Bus Transit, Inc.

577 F.3d 467 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 20, 2009

, and the Board’s General Counsel failed to object to, and even personally entered, such evidence.3 See Ostano Commerzanstalt v. … Elec. & Power Co. v.

Drug Plastics & Glass Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

44 F.3d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 1995

Drug Plastics & Glass Co. v. NLRB, 30 F.3d 169 (D.C.Cir.1994). … (emphasis added) (quoting National Licorice Co. v. NLRB, 309 U.S. 350, 369 , 60 S.Ct. 569, 579 , 84 L.Ed. 799 (1940)). Thus, as we noted in G.W. Galloway Co. v.

Brown v. Gandy

125 A.D.3d 1389 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 6, 2015

Family Court properly concluded that the standard to be applied in determining the location of visitation is the best interests of the child (see Matter of Gold v Gold, 53 AD3d 485, 488 [2008]). … NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; see Matter of Reinhardt v Hardison, 122 AD3d 1448, 1449 [2014]).

Brown v. Dzurenda

434 P.3d 294 · Nevada Supreme Court · Jan 2, 2019

Com. v. Brown

209 A.3d 1034 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 2019

State v. Brown

364 Or. 849 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 2019

Brown v. State

275 So. 3d 564 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 26, 2019

Brown v. Sauers

437 P.3d 103 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Mar 22, 2019

People v. Brown

429 Ill. Dec. 274 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 22, 2019

State v. Brown

818 S.E.2d 647 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 2018