Case law

Gray v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

363 Or. 104 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 2018

School District No. 17 v. Powell

203 Or. 168 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1955

Lane County v. Neilon, 44 Or. 14, 21 ( 74 Pac. 212 ). Presumptions of this character are made a part of the substantive law of this State by statutory enactment. In State ex inf. Brown v. … The doctrine of this case was followed and applied in State ex rel Brown v. Bailey, 151 Or 496, 500 , 51 P2d 671 , which was likewise a quo warranto proceeding involving the organization of a port.

Cooper v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

294 Or. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 19, 2018

Knox v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

362 Or. 699 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 2018

Barrett v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

292 Or. App. 560 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 2018

Penn v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

290 Or. App. 935 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 2018

Sentrol, Inc. v. Bronson

112 Or. App. 354 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1992

There was substantial evidence to support the facts found by the Board, and it was not required to explain its reasons for disregarding the referee’s opinion on credibility. Erck v. … The Board erred by denying fees on that rationale. On remand, the Board should consider whether attorney fees are authorized by ORS 656.386. See Short v. SAIF, 305 Or 541 , 754 P2d 575 (1988); Shoulders v.

Erwin v. Oregon State Bar

149 Or. App. 99 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 2, 1997

Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982) (citation omitted). … Prestress v.

Young v. Gard

129 Or. 534 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1929

Justice Brown in Twohy Brothers v. Ochoco Irr. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Gray v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

289 Or. App. 643 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 28, 2017

Peterson v. The Chandos

4 F. 645 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 9, 1880

Harden v. Gorden, 2 Mass. 547 ; Reed v. Canfield, 1 Sum. 197 ; The Ben Flint, 1 Abb. U. S. R. 128; Brown v. Overton, Sprag. Dec. 462. … In Brown v.

Astoria Marine Iron Works v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

295 F. 415 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 4, 1924

S. v. Strang, 254 U. S. 491 , 41 Sup. Ct. 165, 65 L. Ed. 368 ; Sloan Shipyard Cor. v. U. S. E. F. C., 258 U. S. 549 , 42 Sup. Ct. 386, 66 L. … Parks v. Ross, 11 How. 371 , 13 L. Ed. 730 ; Hodgson v. Dexter, 1 Cranch, 362 , 2 L. Ed. 130 ; Sheets v. Selden’s Lessee, 2 Wall. 187 , 17 L. Ed. 822 ; Belknap v. Schild, 161 U. S. 17 , 16 Sup. Ct. 443, 40 L. Ed. 599 .

Mendacino v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

362 Or. 508 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2018

Sayers v. EMPLOYMENT DIV., STATE OF OREGON

59 Or. App. 270 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1982

This conclusion finds support in a statement made by the Supreme Court in Brown v. EBI Companies, 289 Or 455 , 616 P2d 457 (1980). … Although the decision in Brown did not disturb this rule, the court noted: *281 “One difference between ORS 18.160 and ORS 656.319(1)(b) not noted in Sekermestrovich v.

Webb v. Heintz

52 Or. 444 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1908

E. 271 ) ; Mayor, etc., of Birmingham v. Tayloe, 105 Ala. 170 ( 16 South. 576 ) ; West v. City of Eau Claire, 89 Wis. 31 ( 61 N. W. 313 ) ; Jennings v. Van Schaick, 108 N. Y. 530 ( 15 N. E. 424 : 2 Am. … Rep. 459 ) ; Brown v. Weaver (Pa.), 5 Atl. 32 . Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered. Reversed.

Norwood v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.

112 Or. 106 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1924

v. … The acts of the defendant, pretending to rely upon a void order of ’the water board, amounts to a continued trespass which equity is authorized to enjoin: Chapman v. Dean, 58 Or. 476 ( 115 Pac. 154 ); Stotts v.

Hand Manufacturing Co. v. Marks

36 Or. 523 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1900

Calvert v. Dock Co. is cited as opposed to this view; so, also, are the cases of Bragg v. Shain, 49 Cal. 135 ; Simonson v. Grant, 36 Minn. 439 ( 31 N. W. 861 ); Board of Commissioners v. Branham (C. … In Board of Commissioners v.

Knox v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

288 Or. App. 384 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 2017

Hyde v. Albert E. Peirce & Co.

147 Or. 5 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1934

Merton v. Hansen, 200 Wis. 576 ( 229 N. W. 53 ), is a case wherein the statute provided that each town board shall grant licenses to such persons as they deem proper for the sale of nonintoxicating liquor. … Answer: ‘I think Bell sent it to Brown and Brown sent it to me. ’ “A. Mr. Fletcher, you are talking of two different things here.

Cooper v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

364 Or. 723 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 2019