Case law

Board of County Commissioners v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

754 F.3d 1025 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 2014

Paul v. … See Delaware Cnty. v. FHFA, 747 F.3d 215 (3d Cir. 2014); Hennepin Cnty. v. Fed. Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n, 742 F.3d 818 (8th Cir. 2014); DeKalb Cnty. v. FHFA, 741 F.3d 795 (7th Cir. 2013); Cnty. of Oakland v.

Hall v. Henderson

672 A.2d 1047 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1996

See Brown-Bey v. Hyman, 649 A.2d 8, 10 (D.C.1994) (noting after Greenholtz analysis that “the Board’s determination of an appropriate set-off date does not implicate due process considerations”); White v. … Brown-Bey, 649 A.2d at 10 ; Jones, 647 A.2d at 1117 , and in its parole decisions generally, see McRae v.

Lakeland Bus Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

347 F.3d 955 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 2003

See NLRB v. Truitt Mfg. Co., 351 U.S. 149, 152-53 (1956). … See, e.g., Stroehmann Bakeries, Inc. v.

Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones Board

803 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 1992

While the complaint is somewhat general, it attacks the action of the Board in granting a new FTZ which allegedly threatens to affect the business of an FTZ previously authorized and awarded by the Board to plaintiff in the … The FTZ Act is silent as to whether a Board action authorizing an FTZ is reviewable by any court.

Wilkes-Barre Hospital Co., LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

857 F.3d 364 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 2017

Relevant to this case, we previously suggested that “a properly constituted Board” could ratify the decisions of an improperly constituted Board. See Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. … Federal courts, not the Board, are the primary source of authority in interpreting collective bargaining agreements. Litton Fin. Printing Div. v. NLRB, 501 U.S. 190, 202–03 (1991); Enloe Med. Ctr. v.

Air Transport Association of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board

732 F.2d 219 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 1984

Federal Power Comm’n v. New England Power Co., 415 U.S. 345 , 94 S.Ct. 1151 , 39 L.Ed.2d 383 (1974); National Cable Television Ass’n v. … See also Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Costle, 590 F.2d 1011, 1031 (D.C.Cir.1978); Action for *225 Children’s Television v.

Kwik Care Ltd. v. National Labor Relations Board

82 F.3d 1122 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1996

Krehbiel Co. v. NLRB, 844 F.2d 880, 882 (D.C.Cir.1988); J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. v. NLRB, 571 F.2d 850, 854 (5 Cir.1978); Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. … See, e.g., NLRB v.

San Miguel Hospital Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

697 F.3d 1181 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 2012

Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge, EDWARDS and SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.  2 Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SILBERMAN. … Its promulgation in 1989 was a notable event in which the Board responded to differing positions taken by the Board and courts of appeals. See generally St. Margaret Mem’l Hosp. v.

Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

551 F.2d 1293 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 1977

V. … SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 95 , 63 S.Ct. 454 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943). Burlington Truck Lines v. U.

Garlock Equipment Company v. National Labor Relations Board

709 F.2d 722 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1983

NLRB v. … Although NLRB v. Winburn Tile Mfg.

United States ex rel. Girard Trust Co. v. Helvering

85 F.2d 230 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 1936

Undoubtedly, as we think, the decision of the court and the finding of the Board made mandatory the duty of the Commissioner to make the refund. Blair v. United States, 55 App.D.C. 359 , 6 F.(2d) 484 ; James v. … Brown. Anderson v. Wilson, 289 U.S. 20, 26, 27 , 53 S.Ct. 417 , 77 L.Ed. 1004 , and Wynne v.

Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board

306 F.3d 1108 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 8, 2002

In Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board, 237 F.3d 676 (D.C.Cir.2001) (AAR v. … The AAR disagreed and sought review of the Board’s decision. In AAR v.

Hollingsworth v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

380 A.2d 592 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1977

[Washington v. Clemmer, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 229 n.4, 339 F.2d 725 , 728 n.4 (1964).] Before REILLY, Chief Judge, Retired, and GALLAGHER and NEBEKER, Associate Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM. … See, e. g., American Security & Trust Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Bd., D.C.App., 376 A.2d 824 , 826 n.2 (1977).

Gilbert v. National Labor Relations Board

56 F.3d 1438 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 16, 1995

Corp. v. … Group v. FERC, 732 F.2d 202, 211 (D.C.Cir.1984)); see also West Coast Media, Inc. v.

Union Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

221 F.2d 532 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 1955

B. v. Mackay Radio, 304 U.S. 333 [ 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 ]). … Unemployment Compensation Comm. v. Aragon, 1946, 329 U.S. 143 , 67 S.Ct. 245 , 91 L.Ed. 136 , and cases there cited; Brooks v.

Laborers' District Council v. National Labor Relations Board

501 F.2d 868 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1974

F. of L. v. NLRB, 308 U.S. 401, 410 , 60 S.Ct. 300, 304 , 84 L.Ed. 347 (1940). The Board has been entrusted with complete control of election proceedings. Excelsior Laundry v. NLRB, 409 F.2d 70 (10th Cir. 1968). … There is a broad presumption in favor of the remedy chosen by the Board. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 177 , 61 S.Ct. 845 , 85 L.Ed. 845 (1941); NLRB v. Rutter Rex Mfg.

Deferiet Paper Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

235 F.3d 581 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 2000

Deferiet tells us that this precedent, which the Board invoked here, conflicts with a dictum in NLRB v. … In determining whether a unit is appropriate, the Board exercises wide discretion. Packard Motor Car Co. v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485, 491 (1947).

B B & L, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

52 F.3d 366 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 1995

We will uphold the Board’s exercise of discretion unless its action is unreasonable, arbitrary or unsupported by the evidence. NLRB v. Mar Salle, Inc., 425 F.2d 566, 569 (D.C.Cir.1970); NLRB v. … Workers v. NLRB, 604 F.2d 689 , 695 (D.C.Cir.1979). Nevertheless, the Board cannot ignore its own relevant precedent but must explain why it is not controlling. Cleveland Constr. Co. v.

Knu-Vise, Inc. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board

195 F.2d 198 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 1952

The War Contracts Price Adjustment Board determined that petitioner realized excessive profits of $80,0.00 for 1943 and of $35,000 for 1944. … Electrical Motors v. Jones, 1946, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 329 , 153 F.2d 134 ; Lowell Wool By-Products Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. —, 192 F.2d 405 . 2 . Sec.

Davis v. District of Columbia Board of Education

530 F. Supp. 1215 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 21, 1982

III 1979) and Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia, 348 F.Supp. 866 (D.D.C.1972). … See Patsel v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 530 F.Supp. 660, at 667 (D.D.C.1982) (Memorandum Opinion and Order granting attorney’s fees).