Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

2.64s

  • Woodtek, Inc. v. Musulin

    263 Or. 644 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1972

    Plaintiff relies on Brown v. Hassenstab, 212 Or *654 246, 319 P2d 929 (1957). … Brown v. Hassenstab, supra; 2 Restatement, Contracts § 470, Comment a. Plaintiff’s final assignment of error concerns the trial court’s failure to award relief in addition to rescission.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 3, 2020

    BROWN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01007-HZ Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA … Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Donaca v. Curry County

    77 Or. App. 677 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1986

    Hurst v. Board of Com’rs of Pulaski County,_Ind _, 476 NE2d 832, 833 (1985). … Brown, 410 So 2d 258 (La App 1982) (plaintiff’s view from stop sign obstructed by shrubs on private property); Stewart v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of Forestry

    189 Or. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 24, 2003

    Co. v. … Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (A79626), 131 Or App 538, 551 , 886 P2d 1033 (1994). On review, the Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part.

    Reversed by Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of Forestry, 339 Or. 136 (2005)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Jackson County Assessor v. Brown, 4389 (or.tax 8-13-1999)

    Oregon Tax Court · Aug 13, 1999

    On February 10, 1999, a magistrate issued a written decision in Brown v. Jackson County Assessor, OTC-MD 982848D. On February 22, 1999, a motion for reconsideration was filed and was denied by order dated March 4, 1999. … On April 12, 1999, a Complaint was filed in the Regular Division entitled Jackson County Assessor v. Sandra Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pierce v. Douglas School District No. 4

    68 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 2, 1984

    Petitioner, the prevailing party in Pierce v. Douglas Sch. Dist. … See also Brown v. Adult and Family Services, 293 Or 6, 14 , 643 P2d 1266 (1982) (apparently accepting the Wasco County principle); cf. Valley and Siletz Railroad v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Klutsenbeker v. Jackson County

    185 Or. App. 96 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 2002

    Further, claimant argues that, under the rule announced in Georgia-Pacific v. … See Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile, 311 Or 519 , 815 P2d 1251 (1991). Nor does Piwowar help claimant. As we stated in Hill v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State of Oregon v. Cahill

    208 Or. 538 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1956

    The same reasoning was applied in People v. Hill, 2 Cal App2d 141, 37 P2d 849 . And see, People v. Meadows, 199 NY 1 , 92 NE 128 ; Brown v. Christman, 126 F2d 625; American Surety Co. of New York v. … Greenwald, 223 Minn 37, 25 NW2d 681 ; Dunlop Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Hospelhorn, 172 Md 279, 191 A 701; Tate v. Emery, 139 Or 214 , 9 P2d 136 ; State v. Browning, 47 Or 470 , 82 P 955 ; Jansen v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Penn v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    290 Or. App. 935 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 2018

    Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Oregon Department of Transportation

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 5, 2020

    Winter v. Nat. Res. … Brown Decl. Ex. 1.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.

    257 Or. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 2013

    See, e.g., Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 591 , 763 P2d 408 (1988) (applying that standard to attorney fee awards under what is now ORS 656.262(11) and under ORS 656.382(1)). … Saxton v. SAIF, 80 Or App 631, 633 , 723 P2d 355 , rev den, 302 Or 159 (1986); Dotson v. Bohemia, Inc., 80 Or App 233, 236 , 720 P2d 1345 , rev den, 302 Or 35 (1986); Bahler v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • SAIF Corp. v. Thompson

    267 Or. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 2014

    SAIF v. Brown, 159 Or App 440, 445 , 978 P2d 407 (1999) (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, claimant experienced muscular discomfort in his right chest and neck while he was off duty. … See SAIF v.

    Reversed by Saif Corp. v. Thompson, 360 Or. 155 (2016)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Open Our Oregon v. Kate Brown

    District Court, D. Oregon · May 19, 2020

    OPINION AND ORDER KATE BROWN, in her official capacity as the Governor of the State of Oregon, LILLIAN SHIRLEY, in her official … In Crowley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • White v. City of Seaside

    107 Or. 330 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1923

    Co. v. Ochoco Irr. Dist., June 12, 1923 ( 210 Pac. 873 ). This provision of the charter is mandatory. … Brown and Band, JJ., concur.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Petshow v. Farm Bureau Insurance

    76 Or. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 4, 1985

    Forney v. Western States Plywood, 297 Or 628 , 686 P2d 1027 (1984); Brown v. EBI Companies, 289 Or 905 , 618 P2d 959 (1980); Uris v. Compensation Department, 247 Or 420 , 427 P2d 753 , 430 P2d 861 (1967). … Ins. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Arms

    106 Or. App. 343 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 1991

    Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 592 , 763 P2d 408 (1988). The Board followed the correct legal standard: whether employer had a legitimate doubt as to its liability. … Employer challenges the Board’s findings, claiming that they are unsupported by substantial evidence and that they do not lead to the Board’s conclusion.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • LaTulippe v. Oregon Medical Board

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 16, 2025

    This allegation does not defeat a claim of absolute immunity, which extends to the Medical Board’s “quasi-prosecutorial” functions as well as its quasi-judicial functions. Olsen v. … Finally, Plaintiff argues that the absolute immunity afforded state medical board members acting in a judicial or prosecutorial capacity must be reevaluated in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in SEC v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Young v. Gard

    129 Or. 534 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1929

    Justice Brown in Twohy Brothers v. Ochoco Irr. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    364 Or. 723 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Cooper v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    294 Or. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 19, 2018

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.