Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.03s
Barry v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
448 F. Supp. 1249 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 1978
Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974), and American Party v. White, 415 U.S. 767 , 94 S.Ct. 1296 , 39 L.Ed.2d 744 (1974). 3 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedAssociation of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board
237 F.3d 676 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 2001
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Board’s determination. See Western Coal Traffic League v. … (quoting Association of American Railroads v. Costie, 562 F.2d 1310 , 1316 (D.C.Cir.1977)); see also Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSitka Sound Seafoods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
206 F.3d 1175 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 2000
Board of Regents of University of Washington v. EPA, 86 F.3d 1214, 1221 (1996) (citations omitted). So we hold again.* B. … Co. v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedVico Products Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
333 F.3d 198 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2003
The Board’s ‘‘clear and unmistakable’’ rule as explained in Metropolitan Edison Co. v. … , Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDelta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
275 F.2d 632 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 10, 1959
The Board denies the applicability of Ashbacker in this latter situation and refers us to Pauley v. … required by Delta Air Lines v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDenver S. Cooper v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
24 F.3d 1414 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1994
Railroad Retirement Board, 977 F.2d 647 (D.C.Cir.1992) (“Cooper I ”); 2) In re Cooper, No. 93-1102, 1993 WL 71714 (D.C.Cir. Mar. 3, 1993) (petition for mandamus); 3) proceedings on remand to the Board; and 4) Cooper v. … See Sullivan v.
Cited 70 timesPublishedBreen v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board
731 A.2d 843 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 1999
The Board found petitioner was sixty-one percent disabled and thus entitled to an annuity of $15,834.38. Petitioner appealed this determination. In Breen v. … Oubre v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 630 A.2d 699, 702 (D.C.1993).
Cited 2 timesPublishedRailway Labor Executives' Association v. National Mediation Board
38 F.3d 1224 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 20, 1994
38 F.3d 1224 309 U.S.App.D.C. 36 RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, Appellee. Nos. 91-5223, 91-5310. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJohn Daniel Brown v. Dale C. Cameron, Superintendent, St. Elizabeths Hospital
353 F.2d 835 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 1965
Cited 13 timesPublishedBatty v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board
537 A.2d 204 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1988
We have grave problems with the reasoning of the Board in this respect. While Dr. … , in Baumgartner v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNorth Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
281 F.2d 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 1960
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co., 288 U.S. 14, 84 , 53 S.Ct. 266, 272 , 77 L.Ed. 588 . … United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 7 Cir., 198 F.2d 100, 105, 106 ; Western Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 9 Cir., 196 F.2d 933 . .
Cited 1 timesPublishedLaboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. National Labor Relations Board
942 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 2013
The plaintiff, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in North Carolina, seeks an injunction declaring that the defendant, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), is without the authority “to require … See Evenflow Transp., Inc. v. NLRB, No. 12-3054 (2d Cir. filed Aug. 1, 2012); NLRB v. New Vista Nursing & Rehab., Nos. 11-3440, 12-1027, and 12-1936 (3d Cir. filed Mar. 29, 2013); NLRB v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedManhattan Center Studios, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
452 F.3d 813 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 2006
We review the Board’s order to determine “whether the Board acted arbitrarily or otherwise erred in applying established law to the facts of the case.” Antelope Valley Bus Co., Inc. v. … See Comprehensive Care Corp. v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedBartel v. National Transportation Safety Board
528 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 13, 2013
See Schwartz v. Helms, 712 F.2d 633 (D.C.Cir.1983). … Moreover, the Board’s decision to dismiss Bartel’s petition under the doctrine of res judicata was not “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” See Dickson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
644 A.2d 995 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1994
See Money v. Cullinane, 392 A.2d 998, 999-1000 (D.C.1978); see also Wells v. … Dupont Circle Citizens Ass’n v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 530 A.2d 1163, 1172 (D.C.1987). 5 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedUnited Christian Scientists v. Christian Science Board of Directors
616 F. Supp. 476 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 1985
Lemon v. … See, e.g., Everson v. Board of Education, supra, (reimbursement of costs of bus transportation to parents of parochial school students); Board of Education v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGoya Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
309 F. App'x 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 2009
This cause was considered on a petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) and was briefed and argued by counsel. … It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by this Court, that the petition for review is hereby denied, and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement is granted essentially for the reasons stated by the Board. Pursuant to D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedScolaro v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
946 F. Supp. 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 1996
See also Growe v. … See Watson v. Buck, 313 U.S. 387, 400 , 61 S.Ct. 962, 966 , 85 L.Ed. 1416 (1941); Fenner v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAir Line Pilots Ass'n v. Civil Aeronautics Board
458 F.2d 846 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 1972
Ill American Airlines v. CAB, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 348 , 235 F.2d 845 (1956), cert. denied, Air Coach Transport Ass’n v. … Western Air Lines v. CAB, 122 U.S.
Cited 3 timesPublishedLakeland Bus Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
347 F.3d 955 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 2003
See NLRB v. Truitt Mfg. Co., 351 U.S. 149, 152-53 (1956). … See, e.g., Stroehmann Bakeries, Inc. v.
Cited 25 timesPublished
Ask Donna