Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

6.03s

  • Barry v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    448 F. Supp. 1249 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 1978

    Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974), and American Party v. White, 415 U.S. 767 , 94 S.Ct. 1296 , 39 L.Ed.2d 744 (1974). 3 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board

    237 F.3d 676 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 2001

    The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Board’s determination. See Western Coal Traffic League v. … (quoting Association of American Railroads v. Costie, 562 F.2d 1310 , 1316 (D.C.Cir.1977)); see also Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Sitka Sound Seafoods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    206 F.3d 1175 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 2000

    Board of Regents of University of Washington v. EPA, 86 F.3d 1214, 1221 (1996) (citations omitted). So we hold again.* B. … Co. v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Vico Products Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    333 F.3d 198 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2003

    The Board’s ‘‘clear and unmistakable’’ rule as explained in Metropolitan Edison Co. v. … , Inc. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    275 F.2d 632 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 10, 1959

    The Board denies the applicability of Ashbacker in this latter situation and refers us to Pauley v. … required by Delta Air Lines v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Denver S. Cooper v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

    24 F.3d 1414 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1994

    Railroad Retirement Board, 977 F.2d 647 (D.C.Cir.1992) (“Cooper I ”); 2) In re Cooper, No. 93-1102, 1993 WL 71714 (D.C.Cir. Mar. 3, 1993) (petition for mandamus); 3) proceedings on remand to the Board; and 4) Cooper v. … See Sullivan v.

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Breen v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

    731 A.2d 843 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 1999

    The Board found petitioner was sixty-one percent disabled and thus entitled to an annuity of $15,834.38. Petitioner appealed this determination. In Breen v. … Oubre v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 630 A.2d 699, 702 (D.C.1993).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Railway Labor Executives' Association v. National Mediation Board

    38 F.3d 1224 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 20, 1994

    38 F.3d 1224 309 U.S.App.D.C. 36 RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, Appellee. Nos. 91-5223, 91-5310. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • John Daniel Brown v. Dale C. Cameron, Superintendent, St. Elizabeths Hospital

    353 F.2d 835 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 1965

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Batty v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

    537 A.2d 204 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1988

    We have grave problems with the reasoning of the Board in this respect. While Dr. … , in Baumgartner v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • North Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    281 F.2d 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 1960

    Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co., 288 U.S. 14, 84 , 53 S.Ct. 266, 272 , 77 L.Ed. 588 . … United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 7 Cir., 198 F.2d 100, 105, 106 ; Western Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 9 Cir., 196 F.2d 933 . .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. National Labor Relations Board

    942 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 2013

    The plaintiff, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in North Carolina, seeks an injunction declaring that the defendant, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), is without the authority “to require … See Evenflow Transp., Inc. v. NLRB, No. 12-3054 (2d Cir. filed Aug. 1, 2012); NLRB v. New Vista Nursing & Rehab., Nos. 11-3440, 12-1027, and 12-1936 (3d Cir. filed Mar. 29, 2013); NLRB v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Manhattan Center Studios, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    452 F.3d 813 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 2006

    We review the Board’s order to determine “whether the Board acted arbitrarily or otherwise erred in applying established law to the facts of the case.” Antelope Valley Bus Co., Inc. v. … See Comprehensive Care Corp. v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Bartel v. National Transportation Safety Board

    528 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 13, 2013

    See Schwartz v. Helms, 712 F.2d 633 (D.C.Cir.1983). … Moreover, the Board’s decision to dismiss Bartel’s petition under the doctrine of res judicata was not “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” See Dickson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    644 A.2d 995 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1994

    See Money v. Cullinane, 392 A.2d 998, 999-1000 (D.C.1978); see also Wells v. … Dupont Circle Citizens Ass’n v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 530 A.2d 1163, 1172 (D.C.1987). 5 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United Christian Scientists v. Christian Science Board of Directors

    616 F. Supp. 476 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 1985

    Lemon v. … See, e.g., Everson v. Board of Education, supra, (reimbursement of costs of bus transportation to parents of parochial school students); Board of Education v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Goya Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    309 F. App'x 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 2009

    This cause was considered on a petition for review and cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) and was briefed and argued by counsel. … It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by this Court, that the petition for review is hereby denied, and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement is granted essentially for the reasons stated by the Board. Pursuant to D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scolaro v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    946 F. Supp. 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 1996

    See also Growe v. … See Watson v. Buck, 313 U.S. 387, 400 , 61 S.Ct. 962, 966 , 85 L.Ed. 1416 (1941); Fenner v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    458 F.2d 846 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 1972

    Ill American Airlines v. CAB, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 348 , 235 F.2d 845 (1956), cert. denied, Air Coach Transport Ass’n v. … Western Air Lines v. CAB, 122 U.S.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lakeland Bus Lines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    347 F.3d 955 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 2003

    See NLRB v. Truitt Mfg. Co., 351 U.S. 149, 152-53 (1956). … See, e.g., Stroehmann Bakeries, Inc. v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.