Case law

1000 Feet DC Inc. v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage and Cannabis Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 2025

In Singleton v. D.C. … Mahmoud v.

Ferriso v. National Labor Relations Board

125 F.3d 865 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 19, 1997

In Abrams v. … See Gwirtz v.

Baylor University Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board

578 F.2d 351 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1978

Moreover, this distinction is difficult of application at best and indeed has been rejected by the Board in a similar context as ‘specious.’ ”). . NLRB v. … NLRB v. Universal Camera Corp., 190 F.2d 429, 432 (2d Cir. 1951) (Frank, J„ concurring); Winter, Judicial Review of Agency Decisions: The Labor Board and the Court, 1968 Sup.Ct.Rev. 53-69. . Brooks v.

McGraw-Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

533 F.2d 1266 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 19, 1976

MacKINNON, Circuit Judge: At issue here is a petition for review and a cross-application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board which directs petitioner McGraw-Edison Co. to cease and desist from … The revision of the first part of the Board’s order which appears in the margin 8 would meet the objection we have to its form. Judgment accordingly. 1 .

Bayonne School Board v. United States Department of Education

640 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1986

In Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v.

North Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

281 F.2d 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 1960

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co., 288 U.S. 14, 84 , 53 S.Ct. 266, 272 , 77 L.Ed. 588 . … United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 7 Cir., 198 F.2d 100, 105, 106 ; Western Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 9 Cir., 196 F.2d 933 . .

Williams-Godfrey v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

570 A.2d 737 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1990

Storer v. … BOEE Exhibit # 14; see also Pitts v.

District Unemployment Compensation Board v. Wm. Hahn & Co., Inc.

399 F.2d 987 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 1968

The Board’s mistake would not have occurred if the Board had followed the procedures outlined in the statute. … Woodward & Lothrop v. District of Columbia Unemp. Comp. Bd., 129 U.S.App.D.C. -, 392 F.2d 479 (1968).

Singer v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine

631 A.2d 1232 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1993

The Standard of Review As we recently noted in Allied Security, Inc. v. … See also Harris v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 592 A.2d 1014, 1016 (D.C.1991); Joseph v. District of Columbia Bd. of Medicine, 587 A.2d 1085, 1088 (D.C.1991); Roberts v.

John Daniel Brown v. Dale C. Cameron, Superintendent, St. Elizabeths Hospital

353 F.2d 835 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 29, 1965

Brown, Ronald L. v. Wheat First Sec

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 2001

Brown, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. … We assume in Brown's favor that the Supreme Court's recent decision in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Randolph, 121 S.

Corson and Gruman Company v. National Labor Relations Board

899 F.2d 47 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 1990

Even if the Board did err in not applying Deklewa, moreover, the Company should have addressed that mistake initially before the Board, not this court. See United States v. … Although it did note this point before the Board, the Company never raised this issue in its opening brief before us and therefore waived the argument in this court. See Reyes-Arias v.

Vico Products Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

333 F.3d 198 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2003

The Board’s ‘‘clear and unmistakable’’ rule as explained in Metropolitan Edison Co. v. … , Inc. v.

United Christian Scientists v. Christian Science Board of Directors

616 F. Supp. 476 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 1985

Lemon v. … See, e.g., Everson v. Board of Education, supra, (reimbursement of costs of bus transportation to parents of parochial school students); Board of Education v.

Breen v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

731 A.2d 843 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 1999

The Board found petitioner was sixty-one percent disabled and thus entitled to an annuity of $15,834.38. Petitioner appealed this determination. In Breen v. … Oubre v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 630 A.2d 699, 702 (D.C.1993).

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. National Mediation Board

38 F.3d 1224 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 20, 1994

38 F.3d 1224 309 U.S.App.D.C. 36 RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, Appellee. Nos. 91-5223, 91-5310. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Batty v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

537 A.2d 204 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1988

We have grave problems with the reasoning of the Board in this respect. While Dr. … , in Baumgartner v.

Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Civil Aeronautics Board

458 F.2d 846 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 1972

Ill American Airlines v. CAB, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 348 , 235 F.2d 845 (1956), cert. denied, Air Coach Transport Ass’n v. … Western Air Lines v. CAB, 122 U.S.

Gallothom, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

820 A.2d 530 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 2003

Gallothom relies heavily on Feldman v. Board of Pharmacy of the District of Columbia, 160 A.2d 100, 101 (Mun.Ct.D.C.1960), to argue that the Board’s decision must be remanded. … Vann v. District of Columbia Bd. of Funeral Directors & Embalmers, 441 A.2d 246, 248 (D.C.1982) (citing JBG Properties, Inc. v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Arcade-Sunshine Co., Inc.

122 F.2d 964 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 1941

Creekmore v. United States, 8 Cir., 237 F. 743 , L.R.A.1917C, 845. There is no reason for a different rule in cases instituted by the Board in the discharge of its duty to enforce the labor statute. Second. … Schwartz v. United States, 4 Cir., 217 F. 866 ; Fanning v. United States, 4 Cir., 72 F.2d 929 . We are of opinion, however, that paragraph 10 of the petition extends beyond the terms of the order, and should go out.