Case law

State v. Bowen

366 A.2d 174 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 23, 1976

State v. Brown, 321 A.2d 478, 483 (Me.1974). On review we look only to see if there has been an abuse of judicial discretion. See State v. Gervais, 317 A.2d 796, 800 (Me.1974); State v. Ryder, 348 A.2d 1, 4 (Me.1975). … State v. Brown, 321 A.2d at 482 .

State v. Vahlsing

557 A.2d 946 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 11, 1989

State v. … State v. Whiting, 538 A.2d 300, 302 (Me.1988).

Moreau v. S.D. Warren Co.

748 A.2d 1001 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 12, 2000

The entry is: The decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board is vacated. Remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings consistent with the opinion herein. … The Board concluded, and S.D.

State v. Littlefield

389 A.2d 16 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 11, 1978

Paul Brown testified that the appellant said if anything went wrong he would be the first one shot. … State v. Eaton, Me., 309 A.2d 334, 339 (1973); State v. Smith, Me., 277 A.2d 481 (1971).

Beaudoin v. Tambrands, Inc.

974 A.2d 898 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 7, 2009

Rule, ch. 2, § 2(7). [¶ 9] Tambrands relies on Abbott v. … Tucker v. Associated Grocers of Me.

Heald v. Cooper

8 Me. 32 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1831

. — But it- is alleged, on the part of the plaintiff, that this contract was entered into in reference to a usage or custom prevailing among log dealers on the Kennebec river, to ascertain the quantity of boards which may … Williams v. Gilman, 3 Greenl. 267; 2 Stark. Ev. 453.

Warner v. Cushman

82 Me. 168 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1889

Wyman v. Farrar, 35 Maine, 64; Davis v. Muncey, 38 Maine, 90; Deshon v. Porter, 38 Maine, 289; Garland v. Hodsdon, 46 Maine, 511, 515; Covel v. Hart, 56 Maine, 518; Hines v. … Blake v. Madigan, 65 Maine, 522, 529.

Jasper v. Bowdoinham Federal Credit Union (In Re Jasper)

325 B.R. 50 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Apr 25, 2013

See Jamo v. … Brown v.

DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES ON BEHALF OF HERD v. Hart

639 A.2d 107 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 30, 1994

Olson v. Albert, 523 A.2d 585, 589 (Me.1987). … Department of Human Servs. v. Lowatchie, 569 A.2d 197, 199 (Me.1990). This case does not fall within that exception.

Wawenock, LLC v. Department of Transportation

187 A.3d 609 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 28, 2018

v. … State v. Brown, 571 A.2d 816, 818 (Me. 1990). [¶18] We have relied on all such materials in determining legislative intent in prior matters. Id.

Ciampi v. Hannaford Bros. Co.

681 A.2d 4 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 26, 1996

v. … Clark v. Rust Eng’g Co., 595 A.2d 416, 419 (Me.1991). See also Fletcher v.

Puffer v. L. P. Soule & Son Co.

121 Me. 168 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 8, 1922

The plaintiff was employed to secure laborers for the housing project of the Shipping Board Emer *169 gency Fleet Corporation at Bath. … Ward v. Barrows, 86 Maine, 148. Gilbert v. Wilbur, 105 Maine, 74. No express contract on the part of the defendant to pay the bill in suit is shown.

Robinson v. Armstrong

34 Me. 145 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

Brown v. Hedges, 1 Salk. 290: Steph. N. P. 2696. Or in another State. Mather v. Trinity Church, 3 S. & R. 509. A default is to be entered for damages and cost as per agreement of parties.

Preble v. City of Portland

45 Me. 241 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1858

Harlow v. Pike, 3 Greenl. 438. … Mann v. Marston, 3 Fair. 32.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

727 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 22, 1989

See Unocal v. Mesa Petroleum, 493 A.2d 946, 955 (Del.1985). … Although the Business Judgment Rule may be the more appropriate standard, see id; Rosenthal v. Rosenthal, 543 A.2d 348, 353 (Me.1988); Moran v.

Maine Department of Health & Human Services v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

766 F. Supp. 2d 288 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 25, 2011

Mendez v. Riley, 284 F.3d 772, 777 (1st Cir.2000). … United States v.

Ware v. State

436 A.2d 384 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 30, 1981

The regulations that the Board was found not to have complied with were promulgated by the Board itself after the United States Supreme Court decided Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U. … The “Statement of Purpose” which prefaces the Board’s regulations reads as follows: These procedures are designed to comply with the letter and spirit of Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.

State v. Fournier

708 A.2d 280 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 24, 1998

. [¶ 4] Fournier contends that the outcome of this appeal is dictated by State v. Nelson, 638 A.2d 720 (Me.1994). … State v. Brown, 1997 ME 90, ¶ 5 , 694 A.2d 453, 455 . [¶5] The instant case is distinguishable.

Jody L. Savage v. Maine Pretrial Services, Inc.

58 A.3d 1138 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 17, 2013

Ramsey v. … See Brooks v. Carson, 2012 ME 97, ¶ 19, 48 A.3d 224. Rather, a statute is ambiguous if it “can reasonably be interpreted in more than one way and comport with the actual language of the statute.” Gaeth v.

Matthews v. R. T. Allen & Sons, Inc.

266 A.2d 240 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 8, 1970

In Brown’s Case, 123 Me. 424 , 123 A. 421 (1924) a fatal heart dilation resulted from the exertion of shovelling snow. In Patrick v. J. B. … Brown’s Case, supra, 123 Me. at 425 , 123 A. at 422 .