Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

0.58s

  • Jordan v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review

    315 A.2d 153 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1974

    NEBEKER, Associate Judge: Petitioner seeks review of a District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review *155 (BAR) decision affirming a denial by the Chief of the Metropolitan Police Department of petitioner’s application … [Maryland & District of Columbia Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Washington, supra at 383 , 442 F.2d at 131 (footnote omitted).]

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board

    237 F.3d 676 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 2001

    The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Board’s determination. See Western Coal Traffic League v. … (quoting Association of American Railroads v. Costie, 562 F.2d 1310 , 1316 (D.C.Cir.1977)); see also Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 859, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

    446 F.2d 1319 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1971

    A picket equipped with a sign 2 stationed himself in a motor vehicle across the street from the Brown job site. Brown filed charges with the Board. … We agree with the Board’s conclusion that Byrne, Citadel and Brown were neutral secondary employers. We hold that the Independents were “struck-work allies” of McDonald.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Interstate Quality Services, Inc. v. Railroad Retirement Board

    83 F.3d 1463 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 1996

    But see Itel Corp. v. … v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Board

    537 F.3d 667 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 22, 2008

    context,” Spies v. … Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 408, 413-14 (D.C.Cir.2000). V.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Mathews Readymix, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    165 F.3d 74 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 1999

    Although the Board’s findings of fact are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence, see Avecor, Inc. v. … Sullivan Indus. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Robinson

    705 A.2d 687 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1998

    By contrast, “equivocat[ion]” and lack of candor with the Board similar to petitioner’s caused us to deny reinstatement in In re Brown, 617 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.1992); only when Brown had resolved these issues of honesty did … In re Brown, 649 A.2d 835 (D.C.1994).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. National Mediation Board

    870 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1989

    Whatever deference is owed to the Board under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. … Camp v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Aikens v. United States Postal Service Board of Governors

    665 F.2d 1057 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 8, 1981

    See Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324 , 358 & n.44, 97 S.Ct. 1843 , 1866 n.44, 52 L.Ed.2d 396 (1977). As the Court explained in Furnco Construction Co. v. … Aikens v. United States Postal Serv., 642 F.2d 514 (D.C.Cir.1980), rev'd, 453 U.S. 902 , 101 S.Ct. 3135 , 69 L.Ed.2d 989 (1981). . Aikens v.

    Reversed on other grounds by United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 (1983)Cited 18 timesPublished
  • International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    705 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 2017

    Our review of unfair labor practice determinations by the Board is “quite narrow.” Traction Wholesale Ctr. Co. v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 92, 99 (D.C. Cir. 2000). … Under this standard, the Board’s findings are “conclusive” if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • North Lincoln Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    666 A.2d 63 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1995

    Board must consider views of neighboring residents and property owners); Gerber v. … Jimmy, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    185 F.2d 732 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1950

    B. v. … B. v. Express Publishing Co., 312 U.S. 426, 437 , 61 S.Ct. 693, 700 , 85 L.Ed. 930 . Neither the Board nor the courts- can read the minds of men. As the Board has stated: .

    Cited 202 timesPublished
  • United States v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    644 A.2d 995 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1994

    See Money v. Cullinane, 392 A.2d 998, 999-1000 (D.C.1978); see also Wells v. … Dupont Circle Citizens Ass’n v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 530 A.2d 1163, 1172 (D.C.1987). 5 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown, P Hamilton v. Ridge, Thomas J.

    327 F.3d 1198 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 2003

    Brown v. Summers, 201 F. Supp. 2d 60, 63–64 (D.D.C. 2002). … Brown, 201 F. Supp at 62–63.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    443 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 1971

    The Board refused, and Delta, among others, petitioned this court to review the decision. In National Air Lines, Inc. v. … See City of Lawrence, Massachusetts v. CAB, 343 F.2d 583 (1st Cir. 1965); Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 331 F.2d 579 (1st Cir. (1984)).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Exxel/atmos, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    37 F.3d 1538 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1994

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • 12 Percent Logistics, Inc. v. Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2020

    USAO Matrix Rate Percentage Amount Awarded Total Requested Awarded Notice UCR Board $ 292.00 100% $292.00 Meeting Agenda, ECF No. 54 Resp. to Mot. $ 4,330.70 0% $0.00 Extension, ECF No. 57 Notice Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dodge of Naperville, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    796 F.3d 31 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 2015

    Burke also contends that the Board’s decision in Brown Truck & Trailer Manufacturing Co., 106 N.L.R.B. 999 (1953), establishes that a historical union cannot bargain over the terms and conditions of unit employees at a new … According to the employer, the Board’s opinion is therefore invalid. See New Process Steel v. NLRB, 130 S.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Jameson's Liquors, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    384 A.2d 412 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1978

    Although we are not permitted to “substitute our judgment for that of the Board,” Schiffman v. Alcoholic Bev. Cont. … See Clore Restaurant v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Warehousemen's Union, Local 117 v. National Labor Relations Board

    121 F.2d 84 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1941

    B. v. Falk Corp., 1940, 308 U.S. 453, 461 , 60 S.Ct. 307 , 84 L.Ed. 396 ; N. L. R. B. v. Highland Park Mfg. Co., 4 Cir., 1940, 110 F.2d 632, 640 ; Texas & N. O. R. R. v. Brotherhood of Ry. … F. of L. v. N. L. R. B., 1940, 308 U.S. 401, 405, 409 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 . In Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. N. L. R.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.