Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.58s
Jordan v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review
315 A.2d 153 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1974
NEBEKER, Associate Judge: Petitioner seeks review of a District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review *155 (BAR) decision affirming a denial by the Chief of the Metropolitan Police Department of petitioner’s application … [Maryland & District of Columbia Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Washington, supra at 383 , 442 F.2d at 131 (footnote omitted).]
Cited 3 timesPublishedAssociation of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board
237 F.3d 676 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 2001
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Board’s determination. See Western Coal Traffic League v. … (quoting Association of American Railroads v. Costie, 562 F.2d 1310 , 1316 (D.C.Cir.1977)); see also Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedLaborers' International Union of North America, Local 859, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
446 F.2d 1319 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1971
A picket equipped with a sign 2 stationed himself in a motor vehicle across the street from the Brown job site. Brown filed charges with the Board. … We agree with the Board’s conclusion that Byrne, Citadel and Brown were neutral secondary employers. We hold that the Independents were “struck-work allies” of McDonald.
Cited 5 timesPublishedInterstate Quality Services, Inc. v. Railroad Retirement Board
83 F.3d 1463 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 1996
But see Itel Corp. v. … v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedFree Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Board
537 F.3d 667 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 22, 2008
context,” Spies v. … Wonsover v. SEC, 205 F.3d 408, 413-14 (D.C.Cir.2000). V.
Cited 49 timesPublishedMathews Readymix, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
165 F.3d 74 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 29, 1999
Although the Board’s findings of fact are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence, see Avecor, Inc. v. … Sullivan Indus. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished705 A.2d 687 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1998
By contrast, “equivocat[ion]” and lack of candor with the Board similar to petitioner’s caused us to deny reinstatement in In re Brown, 617 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.1992); only when Brown had resolved these issues of honesty did … In re Brown, 649 A.2d 835 (D.C.1994).
Cited 10 timesPublishedInternational Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. National Mediation Board
870 F.2d 733 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1989
Whatever deference is owed to the Board under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. … Camp v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedAikens v. United States Postal Service Board of Governors
665 F.2d 1057 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 8, 1981
See Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324 , 358 & n.44, 97 S.Ct. 1843 , 1866 n.44, 52 L.Ed.2d 396 (1977). As the Court explained in Furnco Construction Co. v. … Aikens v. United States Postal Serv., 642 F.2d 514 (D.C.Cir.1980), rev'd, 453 U.S. 902 , 101 S.Ct. 3135 , 69 L.Ed.2d 989 (1981). . Aikens v.
Reversed on other grounds by United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 (1983)Cited 18 timesPublishedInternational Longshore & Warehouse Union v. National Labor Relations Board
705 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 2017
Our review of unfair labor practice determinations by the Board is “quite narrow.” Traction Wholesale Ctr. Co. v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 92, 99 (D.C. Cir. 2000). … Under this standard, the Board’s findings are “conclusive” if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNorth Lincoln Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
666 A.2d 63 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 1995
Board must consider views of neighboring residents and property owners); Gerber v. … Jimmy, Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJoy Silk Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
185 F.2d 732 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1950
B. v. … B. v. Express Publishing Co., 312 U.S. 426, 437 , 61 S.Ct. 693, 700 , 85 L.Ed. 930 . Neither the Board nor the courts- can read the minds of men. As the Board has stated: .
Cited 202 timesPublishedUnited States v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
644 A.2d 995 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1994
See Money v. Cullinane, 392 A.2d 998, 999-1000 (D.C.1978); see also Wells v. … Dupont Circle Citizens Ass’n v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 530 A.2d 1163, 1172 (D.C.1987). 5 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedBrown, P Hamilton v. Ridge, Thomas J.
327 F.3d 1198 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 2003
Brown v. Summers, 201 F. Supp. 2d 60, 63–64 (D.D.C. 2002). … Brown, 201 F. Supp at 62–63.
Cited 0 timesPublishedContinental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
443 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 1971
The Board refused, and Delta, among others, petitioned this court to review the decision. In National Air Lines, Inc. v. … See City of Lawrence, Massachusetts v. CAB, 343 F.2d 583 (1st Cir. 1965); Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 331 F.2d 579 (1st Cir. (1984)).
Cited 4 timesPublishedExxel/atmos, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
37 F.3d 1538 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 4, 1994
Cited 4 timesPublished12 Percent Logistics, Inc. v. Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board
District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2020
USAO Matrix Rate Percentage Amount Awarded Total Requested Awarded Notice UCR Board $ 292.00 100% $292.00 Meeting Agenda, ECF No. 54 Resp. to Mot. $ 4,330.70 0% $0.00 Extension, ECF No. 57 Notice Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDodge of Naperville, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
796 F.3d 31 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 2015
Burke also contends that the Board’s decision in Brown Truck & Trailer Manufacturing Co., 106 N.L.R.B. 999 (1953), establishes that a historical union cannot bargain over the terms and conditions of unit employees at a new … According to the employer, the Board’s opinion is therefore invalid. See New Process Steel v. NLRB, 130 S.
Cited 12 timesPublishedJameson's Liquors, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
384 A.2d 412 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1978
Although we are not permitted to “substitute our judgment for that of the Board,” Schiffman v. Alcoholic Bev. Cont. … See Clore Restaurant v.
Cited 31 timesPublishedWarehousemen's Union, Local 117 v. National Labor Relations Board
121 F.2d 84 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1941
B. v. Falk Corp., 1940, 308 U.S. 453, 461 , 60 S.Ct. 307 , 84 L.Ed. 396 ; N. L. R. B. v. Highland Park Mfg. Co., 4 Cir., 1940, 110 F.2d 632, 640 ; Texas & N. O. R. R. v. Brotherhood of Ry. … F. of L. v. N. L. R. B., 1940, 308 U.S. 401, 405, 409 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 . In Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. N. L. R.
Cited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna