Case law

City of Bangor v. Ridley

117 Me. 297 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 3, 1918

This rule needs no citation in this State, but in Goodrich v. … Lesieur v. Rumford, 113 Maine, 317, is a case in which a member of the board of health was employed by the board to attend a case of smallpox.

State v. Smith

461 A.2d 1074 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1983

The cashier testified that on the evening of July 18, 1981, a man of average height with brown hair appeared at the cashier’s window with a revolver and forced her to surrender to him approximately $1,400 in cash. … State v. Porter, 404 A.2d 590, 595 (Me.1979), quoting United States v. Wright, 573 F.2d 681, 685 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 436 U.S. 949 , 98 S.Ct. 2857 , 56 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978).

Robinson v. Armstrong

34 Me. 145 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

Brown v. Hedges, 1 Salk. 290: Steph. N. P. 2696. Or in another State. Mather v. Trinity Church, 3 S. & R. 509. A default is to be entered for damages and cost as per agreement of parties.

Mitton v. Verizon

38 A.3d 1285 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 22, 2012

Tracy v. … Farris v.

In re Estate of Brown

86 Me. 572 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1894

Brown, against all of his heirs, asking for construction of certain portions of the will. … Bain v. Lescher, 11 Sim. 397 ; Boulcott v. Boulcott, 2 Drewry, 25. See also Frazier v. Frazier, 2 Leigh, 642 ; Mebane v.

Gifford v. Nelson Freightways

645 A.2d 11 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 29, 1994

See Morgan-Leland v. … See Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Constr. Corp., 612 A.2d 874, 878 (Me.1992); Norton v. C.P. Blouin, Inc., 511 A.2d 1056 , 1060 n. 5 (Me.1986).

Richardson v. Clark

15 Me. 421 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1839

Duffe v. Mason, 8 Cowen, 25 ; Farrar v. Stackpole, 6 Greenl. 154. … And Justice Butter observed, that where losses have been settled, the provisions on board the vessel when she sailed have been considered part of the ship, Brough v. Whittmore, 4 Term Rep. 206. In Haskins v.

DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES ON BEHALF OF HERD v. Hart

639 A.2d 107 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 30, 1994

Olson v. Albert, 523 A.2d 585, 589 (Me.1987). … Department of Human Servs. v. Lowatchie, 569 A.2d 197, 199 (Me.1990). This case does not fall within that exception.

Summerwind Cottage, LLC v. Town of Scarborough

61 A.3d 698 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 5, 2013

Toomey v. Town of Frye Island, 2008 ME 44, ¶ 11, 943 A.2d 563 (quotation marks omitted). “A court will not substitute its judgment for that of a board.” Id. … Camp v.

Cameron v. Little

62 Me. 550 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1873

Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § 39 ; Taylor’s Landlord and Tenant, § 650 ; Currier v. Barker, 2 Gray, 226 ; Nicholson v. Munigle, 6 Allen, 215 ; Robinson v. Deering, 56 Maine, 357.

Waukeag Ferry Ass'n v. Arey

128 Me. 108 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 11, 1929

Dom., Sec. 214; Snidow v. Board of Supervisors, 96 S. E., 810 (Va.); Larson v. South Dakota, U. S. Sup. Court, Oct. Term, 1928. … Mason v. Harpers Ferry Bridge Co., 17 W. Va., 396, 419 ; Piscataqua Bridge v. N. H. Bridge, 7 N. H., 35, 59; Snidow v. Board of Supervisors, supra.

Toothaker v. Maine Employment Security Commission

217 A.2d 203 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 15, 1966

The contrary view was expressed by three Justices in Lyons v. Appeal Board of Michigan Employ. Sec. Com’n, 363 Mich. 201 , 108 N.W.2d 849 . … Haskett v. Brown, 165 So.2d 25 (La.Ct.App.) The case turned on the creation by the employer of the condition of lack of travel facilities under the circumstances. Such is not the instant case.

State v. Fournier

708 A.2d 280 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 24, 1998

. [¶ 4] Fournier contends that the outcome of this appeal is dictated by State v. Nelson, 638 A.2d 720 (Me.1994). … State v. Brown, 1997 ME 90, ¶ 5 , 694 A.2d 453, 455 . [¶5] The instant case is distinguishable.

Daigle v. STULC

794 F. Supp. 2d 194 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 27, 2011

Ricci v. … Daigle characterizes the Board's views. PSAMF ¶ 388; DRPSAMF V 388. The Court agrees that Ms.

Bridgham v. Hinds

120 Me. 444 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 7, 1921

Brown, 57 Maine, 9; Fairfield Bridge Company v. Nye, 60 Maine, 372; McKee v. Garcelon, supra; Farrar v. Smith, 64 Maine, 74; Reed v. Reed, supra; Goodwin v. Goodwin, supra. Actual delivery is evident. … Boynton v. Veazie, 24 Maine, 286; Bethel Steam Mill Co. v. Brown, supra; Hatch v. Standard Oil Company, 100 U. S., 124 ; 25 Law Ed., 554. See too, Veazie v. Holmes, 40 Maine, 69; Hotchkiss v.

Hiltz

130 Me. 243 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 12, 1931

Brown v. Corey, 134 Mass., 249 . The whole subject of costs in matters of this kind lies in judicial discretion. Peabody v. Mattocks, 88 Me., 164. In the present case, discretion was not abused. Exceptions overruled.

Buck v. Town of Yarmouth

402 A.2d 860 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 21, 1979

See also Inhabitants of Town of North Berwick v. State Board of Education, Me., 227 A.2d 462, 472 (1967). . … Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 , 82 S.Ct. 691 , 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962) (a fraction of a vote); Harper v. Virginia Board of Electors, 383 U.S. 663 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966) (a $1.50 pool tax); McGowan v.

Sargent

115 Me. 130 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 8, 1916

In Baker v. … And likewise, substantially, in Vance v. Vance, 17 Maine, 203, 204; Brown v. Brown, 37 N. H., 536, 537; 75 Am. Dec., 154 , 155. See also Jillson v. Jillson, 63 Vt., *134 411 .

Hamilton v. Madison Water Co.

116 Me. 157 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 7, 1917

Wilkinson v. Standard Oil Co., 78 N. J., Law 524. … Jones v. Mt. Holly Water Co., 87 N. J., Law, 106.

Conway Lake Resorts, Inc. v. Quisisana Resort

899 A.2d 815 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 22, 2006

Lewis v. Town of Rockport, 2005 ME 44, ¶ 11 , 870 A.2d 107, 110 (quotation marks omitted). … See Boivin v. Town of Sanford, 588 A.2d 1197, 1199 (Me.1991); Frost v.