Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

3.51s

  • Roosevelt Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

    734 F.2d 56 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 1984

    Compare Booth v. Hammock, 605 F.2d 661 (2d Cir.1979) (Greenholtz makes shall/unless formulation decisive) and Slocum v. Georgia State Board of Pardons & Paroles, 678 F.2d 940 (11th Cir.1982) (same) with Winsett v. … Anderson v.

    Cited 101 timesPublished
  • International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    705 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 2017

    Our review of unfair labor practice determinations by the Board is “quite narrow.” Traction Wholesale Ctr. Co. v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 92, 99 (D.C. Cir. 2000). … Under this standard, the Board’s findings are “conclusive” if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    458 F.2d 782 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 28, 1971

    We agree with the Government and with Ozark Air Lines, Inc. v. … Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 126, 148 , 385 F.2d 648, 670 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 944 , 88 S.Ct. 1029 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1133 (1968); Virgo Corp. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • ITT Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    413 F.3d 64 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 2005

    This court reviewed the Board’s decision in ITT Industries, Inc. v. NLRB, 251 F.3d 995, 1006-07 (D.C. Cir. 2001). … NLRB v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Allied Mechanical Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    668 F.3d 758 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 17, 2012

    Ass’n v. … See Kravis, 550 F.3d at 1189 (deferring to the Board’s finding of section 9(a) status where the Board “reasonably” reached its conclusion); see also NLRB v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Capitol International Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    392 F.2d 511 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 1968

    Federal Trade Comm’n v. [Standard] Education Society, 302 U.S. 112, 117 [ 58 S.Ct. 113, 115 , 82 L.Ed 141]; Gray v. Powell, 314 U.S. 402, 412 [ 62 S.Ct. 326, 332 , 86 L.Ed. 301 ]; Labor Board v. … Outagamie County, Wisconsin v. C.A.B., 355 F.2d 900 (7th Cir. 1966).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    228 F.2d 17 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 24, 1955

    Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications Comm., 320 U.S. 327 , 66 S.Ct. 148, 90 L.Ed. 108 (1945). . Northwest Airlines v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, 90 U.SApp.D.C. 158, 194 F.2d 339 (D.C.Cir.1952); Western Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 184 F.2d 545 (9th Cir.1950). . Supra note 5, 326 U.S. at page 332 , 66 S.Ct. at page 150 . .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    443 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 12, 1971

    The Board refused, and Delta, among others, petitioned this court to review the decision. In National Air Lines, Inc. v. … See City of Lawrence, Massachusetts v. CAB, 343 F.2d 583 (1st Cir. 1965); Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 331 F.2d 579 (1st Cir. (1984)).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Szewczyk v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

    633 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1993

    accept as adequate to support [the Board’s] conclusion,” Baumgartner v. … D.C.Code § 4-616(a) required the Board to determine whether petitioner’s fall caused his disability, either directly or by aggravating a prior job-related injury. E.g., Allen v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sundor Brands, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    168 F.3d 515 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1999

    In American Hospital Association v. … See NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Peterson v. District of Columbia Lottery & Charitable Games Control Board

    673 A.2d 664 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1996

    See, e.g., Haynes v. Department of the Lottery, 630 So.2d 1177, 1179 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.), review denied, 642 So.2d 746 (Fla.1994); Parsons v. South Dakota Lottery Comm’n, 604 N.W.2d 693 , 597 (S.D.1993); Thao v. … Meadow Green-Wildcat Corp. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Blue Man Vegas, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

    529 F.3d 417 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 2008

    Before: GINSBURG, BROWN, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG. … The Board’s principal concern in evaluating a proposed bargaining unit is whether the employees share a “community of interest.” NLRB v. Action Auto., Inc., 469 U.S. 490, 494 (1985); see also Agri Processor Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Airborne Freight Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    257 F.2d 210 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1958

    257 F.2d 210 AIRBORNE FREIGHT CORPORATION (a California corporation), Petitioner, v. … In the light of United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Action on Smoking and Health v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    713 F.2d 795 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 5, 1983

    City of Cleveland v. … See Joseph v. United States Civil Serv. Comm’n, 554 F.2d 1140 , 1154 n. 27 (D.C.Cir.1977); Mobil Oil Corp. v.

    Cited 105 timesPublished
  • International Union of Petroleum & Industrial Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Irwin Industries, Inc.

    980 F.2d 774 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1992

    It is our responsibility to examine carefully both the Board’s findings and its reasoning_” Peoples Gas Sys., Inc. v. NLRB, 629 F.2d 35 , 42 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Avecor, Inc. v. … Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Kiewit Power Constructors Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    652 F.3d 22 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 2011

    Moreover, “[w]here the Board has disagreed with the ALJ, as occurred here, the standard of review with respect to the substantiality of the evidence does not change.” Local 702, Int’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. … See NLRB v. Sw. Bell Tel.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Warehousemen's Union, Local 117 v. National Labor Relations Board

    121 F.2d 84 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1941

    B. v. Falk Corp., 1940, 308 U.S. 453, 461 , 60 S.Ct. 307 , 84 L.Ed. 396 ; N. L. R. B. v. Highland Park Mfg. Co., 4 Cir., 1940, 110 F.2d 632, 640 ; Texas & N. O. R. R. v. Brotherhood of Ry. … F. of L. v. N. L. R. B., 1940, 308 U.S. 401, 405, 409 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 . In Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. N. L. R.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Turner v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    183 F. Supp. 2d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2001

    Board of Elections and Ethics (“the Board”). … Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam)).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Arc Bridges, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    662 F.3d 1235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 2011

    In doing so they are performing an internal management function beyond the Board’s competence. See First Nat’l Maint. Corp. v. … 7 Nemours & Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    259 F.2d 808 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 20, 1958

    Civil Aeronautics Board, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 184 , 243 F.2d 607 (1957); United Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 42 , 228 F.2d 13 (1955) 3 United Air Lines v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, supra note 1 4 North American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 55 , 237 F.2d 209 (D.C.Cir.1956)

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.