Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

5.81s

  • Garvey Marine, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    245 F.3d 819 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 2001

    Co. v. NLRB, 140 F.3d 259, 265 (D.C.Cir.1998). The Board’s determination finds such support. … Plastics, Inc. v. NLRB, 209 F.3d 727, 738 (D.C.Cir.2000), we scrutinize with great care the Board’s decision to issue one. The Board must show that the employer’s ULPs were “serious,” Skyline Distrib. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Local 702, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

    215 F.3d 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 2000

    American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); and National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, supra, 380 U.S. at 289 , 85 S.Ct. at 987 ; American Ship Building Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global Ministries

    98 F. App'x 8 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 2004

    See Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Stewart v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 422, 426 (D.C.Cir.2003). Hopkins’s third claim is legally insufficient for a separate reason.

    Cited 214 timesPublished
  • W.C. McQuaide, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    133 F.3d 47 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 16, 1998

    Therefore, we summarily enforce the Board’s order with respect to these charges. See Grondorf, Field, Black & Co. v. NLRB, 107 F.3d 882, 885 (D.C.Cir.1997); Intl. Union of Petroleum & Indus. Workers v. … See Taylor v. FDIC, 132 F.3d 753, 766 (D.C.Cir.1997) (quoting Katradis v. Dav-El of Wash., 846 F.2d 1482, 1485 (D.C.Cir.1988)).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Epps v. U.S. Capitol Police Board, Employing Office

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2010

    Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39-40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Britton v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

    681 A.2d 1152 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 1996

    Allen, supra, 528 A.2d at 1230 ; accord, Dowd v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters’ Retirement & Relief Board, 485 A.2d 212, 216-217 (D.C.1984); Kirkwood v. … Croskey v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters’ Retirement & Relief Board, 596 A.2d 988, 989 (D.C.1991).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board

    649 F.3d 723 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2011

    Before: HENDERSON , BROWN and KAVANAUGH , Circuit Judges. 2 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON . … . & Presbyterian Hosp. v. NLRB, No. 09-1200 (D.C. Cir. July 16, 2009). After the United States Supreme Court held that three Board members are required to constitute a Board quorum in New Process Steel, L.P. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Walter C. Barnes v. George J. Reed, Chairman, United States Board of Parole, Members, United States Board of Parole

    301 F.2d 516 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 11, 1962

    The District Court granted the Parole Board’s motion to dismiss on the ground that, since the Board had offered Barnes a rehearing with counsel present, the controversy became moot. Reed v. … Upon the authority of that case the judgment of the District Court in the present ease is reversed, and the case is remanded for the entry of an order in accordance with the opinion in Reed v. Butterworth.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

    277 F.2d 681 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1960

    The cross petition for enforcement is denied, and the case in all other respects is remanded to the Board for further consideration in the light of the master contract and of this opinion. So ordered. . See Doucis v. … Labor Board v. Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corp., 356 U.S. 342, 349 , 78 S.Ct. 718, 722 , 2 L.Ed.2d 823 (1958). . Id., 356 U.S. 342 , 78 S.Ct. 718 (1958).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board

    172 F.2d 22 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 13, 1948

    Railroad Retirement Board v. Duquesne Warehouse Company, 1946, 326 U.S. 446 , 66 S.St. 238, 90 L.Ed. 192 . … United States v. Reading Co.,, 253 U. S. 28 , 44, 40 S.Ct. 425 , 64 L.Ed. 7 (50; Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States, 221 U.S. 1, 46, 76 , 31 S.Ct. 502 , 55 L.Ed. 619 , 84 L.R.A.,N.S., 834, Ann.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Sutter East Bay Hospitals v. National Labor Relations Board

    687 F.3d 424 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 24, 2012

    Milakshmi V. Rajapakse, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was John H. … In NLRB v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • In re Krame

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 2022

    More specifically, we turned to Washington Chapter of American Institute of Architects (AIA) v. D.C. … (quoting Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469, 1484 (3d Cir. 1990))). B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Unbelievable, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    118 F.3d 795 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 1997

    Rich Co. v. … In Smith v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Textile Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    294 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 27, 1961

    In Marine Engineers’ Beneficial Ass’n v. N. L. R. … International Union of Electrical Workers v. N. L. R. B., 110 U.S.App.D.C. 91 , 289 F.2d 757 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Liberty v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

    452 A.2d 1187 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1982

    See Seabolt v. District of Columbia Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 413 A.2d 908, 912 (1980); see generally, Whitehurst v. … Proulx v. District of Columbia Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 430 A.2d 34, 35 (1981); Neer v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • McCall v. DC Boars of Pharmacy

    176 A.3d 173 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Veritas Health Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    671 F.3d 1267 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 2012

    Wayneview Care Center v. NLRB, 664 F.3d 341, 348 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (citation omitted). … See Perdue Farms, Inc. v. NLRB, 144 F.3d 830, 834 (D.C.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    602 F.2d 375 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 1979

    New era or old, so long as the Board continues to be entrusted by Congress with the primary responsibility for the health of air transportation, it remains true, as we said in Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. *201 CAB, 142 U.S.App.D.C … We find the petitions for review to be unavailing and the Board is affirmed. It is so ordered. . The basic authority cited by the Board was United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Roosevelt Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

    734 F.2d 56 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 1984

    Compare Booth v. Hammock, 605 F.2d 661 (2d Cir.1979) (Greenholtz makes shall/unless formulation decisive) and Slocum v. Georgia State Board of Pardons & Paroles, 678 F.2d 940 (11th Cir.1982) (same) with Winsett v. … Anderson v.

    Cited 101 timesPublished
  • Allied Mechanical Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    668 F.3d 758 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 17, 2012

    Ass’n v. … See Kravis, 550 F.3d at 1189 (deferring to the Board’s finding of section 9(a) status where the Board “reasonably” reached its conclusion); see also NLRB v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.