Case law

Siraco v. Astrue

806 F. Supp. 2d 272 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 20, 2011

In Crawford v. … In Jeter v.

Williams's Case

122 Me. 477 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 21, 1923

Then she came back to her brother’s to board, where the son’s promise was continuing. She paid one dollar a week for lodging in another house. The charge for board has not been paid. … Hight v. Company, 116 Maine, 81; Simmons’s Case, 117 Maine, 175; Westman’s Case, 118 Maine, 133; Mailman’s Case, supra; MacDonald v.

Carleton v. Camden Anchor-Rockland Machine Co.

117 Me. 251 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 2, 1918

, at first of a temporary nature and unfastened, and finally fastened, and that these boards ultimately extended to the top of the standards. … These flash-boards became an effective part of the defendant’s dam. National Fibre Board Co. v. Electric Co., 95 Maine, 318.

Kourembanas v. Intercoast Colls.

373 F. Supp. 3d 303 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 28, 2019

Brown, President of InterCoast Career Institute, in Support of Def.'s Mot. for Summ. J. (ECF No. 71-1 ) ( Brown Decl. I ). In Perez-Webber v. InterCoast Career Institute , 2:16-cv-00196-JAW, Ms. … Brown in Support of Def.'s Mot. for Summ. J. (ECF No. 62 ) ( Brown Decl. II ). c.

The Ariel

1 F. Cas. 1113 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 15, 1867

Riggs v. Tayloe, 9 Wheat., [22 U. S.] 483. … S. v. Taylor, [Taylor v. U. S.,] 3 How. [44 U.

Lewis v. State Department of Human Services

433 A.2d 743 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 12, 1981

In Small v. Maine Board of Registration and Examination in Optometry, Me., 293 A.2d 786 (1972), we held unconstitutional a delegation of rule-making authority to the Board of Registration and Examination in Optometry. … The purpose, subject matter, or scope of such regulation was otherwise within the unfettered discretion of the Board. In Stucki v. Plavin, Me., 291 A.2d 508 (1972), and in Waterville Hotel Corp. v.

State v. Cox

138 Me. 151 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 16, 1941

Brown was seated about five feet inside the garage door when Carr entered. … Ct., 962 ; Rowe v. United States, 164 U. S., 546 , 17 S. Ct., 172 , 41 Law ed., 547; and Brown v. United States, 256 U. S., 335 , 41 S. Ct., 501 , 65 Law ed., 961, 18 A. L. R., 1276, cited by the respondent.

Haskell v. Phinney

460 A.2d 1354 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 26, 1983

Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977), the plaintiff had failed to state a “cause of action” 3 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . … Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 6 Haskell had failed to state a claim for relief under section 1983. 7 In Mt.

BLANCHARD

District Court, D. Maine · Apr 27, 2026

Ass’n v. Perry Loc. … epithets.”); Hunt v.

Gaeth v. Deacon

964 A.2d 621 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 3, 2009

Brown v. … Brown, 2005 ME 75, ¶ 10 , 880 A.2d at 1116 .

Gifford v. Nelson Freightways

645 A.2d 11 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 29, 1994

See Morgan-Leland v. … See Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Constr. Corp., 612 A.2d 874, 878 (Me.1992); Norton v. C.P. Blouin, Inc., 511 A.2d 1056 , 1060 n. 5 (Me.1986).

Wilder v. Sprague

50 Me. 354 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1863

Justice Coleridge, in Doe v. Ulph, 66 E. C. … The case of Sears v. Wright, 24 Maine, 278, varies in very material respects from the one now before us. There the logs had been manufactured into boards and the boards had been sold before the suit was commenced.

Beckwith v. School Administrative District No. 2

243 A.2d 62 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 17, 1968

to have knowledge of the statutory requirements and must suffer such loss as may have arisen from her failure to comply with the plain terms laid down by the Legislature. *64 The instant case is distinguished from Zeller v. … In Zeller , the teacher on receipt of a notice that his contract would not be renewed, wrote the school board, “I would appreciate reconsideration.”

Pamela G. Argereow v. Verne M. Weisberg, M.D.

195 A.3d 1210 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 16, 2018

v. … v.

Orr v. Skofield

56 Me. 483 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1869

Brown v. Trundy, 31 Maine, 321; Harris v. Burley, 8 N. H., 256. "Whatever words,” remarks Bailey, J., in Whittaker v. Bradley, 16 E. C. … Fowles v. Bowen, 30 N. Y., 20 . " The principle is well settled,” observes J ewett, J., in Kinney v.

Middle Bridge Propr's v. Brooks

13 Me. 391 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1836

Bank of the United States v. Dandridge, 12 Wheat. 64. The duty referred to is one which, from its nature and object, ought by no means to be remitted. … Nichols v. Bertram et al. 3 Pick. 342 , was an action for forcibly passing a turnpike gate, without paying toll.

Pearson v. Freeport School Department

900 A.2d 728 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 27, 2006

In Carroll v. … "We will not overturn a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer unless it can be said that the Board lacks a rational basis for its application of law to the facts.” Celentano v.

McCullough v. Visiting Nurse Service of Southern Maine, Inc.

691 A.2d 1201 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 1997

See Bakal v. … Gautschi v. Maisel, 565 A.2d 1009, 1011 (Me.1989.)

Manson v. Lancey

84 Me. 380 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 28, 1892

Egery v. Decrew, 53 Maine, 392; Evans v. Smith, 34 Maine, 33; Wood on Limitations, sections 105, 115; Blanchard v. Blanchard, 122 Mass. 558 . … In Amos v. Smith, 1 H. & C.

Whitehouse v. Whitehouse

129 Me. 24 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 1930

Franke v. Franke (Cal.), 31 Pac., 371 ; Lyon v. Lyon, 230 Ill., 366 , 82 N. E., 850 ; Browning v. Browning, 89 Kan., 98 , 130 Pac., 852 . … Alexander v. Alexander, 36 App. Cas. (D. C.), 78; Steele v. Steele, 96 Ky., 382 , 29 S. W., 17 ; Montgomery v. Montgomery, 3 Barb. (Ch.), N. Y., 132; Shrady v. Logan, 17 Misc. (N. Y.), 329; 40 N. Y. S., 1010; Bryant v.