Case law

Patricia Blau v. Subversive Activities Control Board

322 F.2d 397 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1963

This is another of the cases referred to in Labor Youth League v. Subversive Activities Control Board. 1 The Colorado Committee to Protect Civil Liberties was an unincorporated association formed in 1954. … The court remanded the case to the Board for findings in respect to the alleged dissolution of the Committee. The Board held hearings. Mrs. Blau was the only witness.

Pettis Ex Rel. U. S. v. Brown and Root, Inc

489 F.2d 1272 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 1974

S. v. Brown and Root, Inc. 72-1868 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 1/14/74 1 D.C.D.C. 2 VAC.

B. Willis, C.P.A., Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

51 F. App'x 321 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 26, 2002

The Board argues that § 10501(a) is the only provision granting the Board jurisdiction, and that § 10501(b) does not expand the Board’s jurisdiction, but only renders the jurisdiction granted in § 10501(a) exclusive. … This interpretation is implausible on its face, and the Board, in determining that it has no jurisdiction over private tracks, has rejected it. See Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. FERC, 28 F.3d 1281 , 1284 (D.C.Cir.1994).

Schwartz Partners Packaging, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

12 F. Supp. 3d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 2014

Am. v. … Finally, Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Board, 130 S.

Daycon Products Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

494 F. App'x 97 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 2012

It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement be granted. … We hold that the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Daycon also raises procedural challenges to the Board’s denial of certain motions.

Pree v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

645 A.2d 603 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 1994

Relying upon this court’s decision in Orange v. … Timus v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Human Rights, 633 A.2d 751, 758-59 (D.C.1993) (en banc); see also Dankman v.

Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

837 F.2d 1123 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1988

Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, supra, at 477, 98 S.Ct. at 2462 . II. … [in] the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, for an order requiring the Board to remove such conservator ..., and the court shall upon the merits dismiss such action or direct the Board to remove such

Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Civil Aeronautics Board

412 F. Supp. 1028 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 1976

Two arguments by the Board militating against such a holding require consideration. First, the defendant contends that Chicago & Southern Airlines v. Waterman S.S. … Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 , 85 S.Ct. 792, 801 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616, 625 (1965).

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

674 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1982

United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 632 , 73 S.Ct. 894, 897 , 97 L.Ed. 1303 (1953). See also Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Department of Energy, 627 F.2d 289 (D.C.Cir.1980). … In New Haven v. CAB, 618 F.2d 955 (2d Cir. 1980), Frontier Airlines v. CAB, 621 F.2d 369 (10th Cir. 1980), and Kern v.

In re Krame

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 2022

More specifically, we turned to Washington Chapter of American Institute of Architects (AIA) v. D.C. … (quoting Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469, 1484 (3d Cir. 1990))). B.

Price v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

542 A.2d 1249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1988

Jones v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 375 A.2d 1, 5-6 (D.C.1977). See also Coakley v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 370 A.2d 1345 (D.C.1977). … See Dowd v. District of Columbia Police and Firefighters Retirement & Relief Bd., 485 A.2d 212, 215 (D.C.1984); Kirkwood v.

Arc Bridges, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

662 F.3d 1235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 2011

In doing so they are performing an internal management function beyond the Board’s competence. See First Nat’l Maint. Corp. v. … 7 Nemours & Co. v.

Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County, Kansas v. Kempthorne

956 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CHEROKEE COUNTY, KANSAS, Plaintiff, v. … In Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v.

Western Coal Traffic League v. Surface Transportation Board

169 F.3d 775 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 1999

Co. v. ICC, 736 F.2d 708 , 717 (D.C.Cir.1984). The Board’s balancing of the various competing interests under the public interest test is entitled to considerable deference. … Western Resources, Inc. v. STB, 109 F.3d 782 (D.C.Cir.1997) and Grainbelt Corp. v. STB, 109 F.3d 794 (D.C.Cir.1997). .

Nancy Johnson v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

969 F.2d 1082 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 11, 1992

Compare Linquist v. … See, e.g., Crandon v.

Sherman v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine

557 A.2d 943 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 9, 1989

Even assuming that North Carolina v. Pearce has application to professional discipline cases, an issue we do not decide, Sherman's contention would fail. … Indeed, we note that in another medical license revocation case, decided approximately three weeks after its latest decision in this case, see Mannan v.

Local 702, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

215 F.3d 11 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 2000

American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965); and National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, supra, 380 U.S. at 289 , 85 S.Ct. at 987 ; American Ship Building Co. v.

Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global Ministries

98 F. App'x 8 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 27, 2004

See Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Stewart v. Ashcroft, 352 F.3d 422, 426 (D.C.Cir.2003). Hopkins’s third claim is legally insufficient for a separate reason.

W.C. McQuaide, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

133 F.3d 47 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 16, 1998

Therefore, we summarily enforce the Board’s order with respect to these charges. See Grondorf, Field, Black & Co. v. NLRB, 107 F.3d 882, 885 (D.C.Cir.1997); Intl. Union of Petroleum & Indus. Workers v. … See Taylor v. FDIC, 132 F.3d 753, 766 (D.C.Cir.1997) (quoting Katradis v. Dav-El of Wash., 846 F.2d 1482, 1485 (D.C.Cir.1988)).

Epps v. U.S. Capitol Police Board, Employing Office

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2010

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39-40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”