Case law

Eugene Water & Elec. Bd. v. Pub. Emps. Ret. Bd. & John T. Wigle

365 Or. 59 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 2019

See Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 254, 391 P.3d 773 (2017) (turning to "the relevant statutes in context to determine the interpretation that best fits the statutory scheme as a whole " (emphasis in original)). … Engweiler v.

Forney v. Western States Plywood

297 Or. 628 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1984

The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed the referee. … Brown v. EBI Companies, 289 Or 905 , 618 P2d 959 (1980).

Penk v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

99 F.R.D. 501 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 28, 1982

Defendant argues that the recent Supreme Court decision in General Telephone Company of the Southwest v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147 , 102 S.Ct. 2364 , 72 L.Ed.2d 740 (1982), and Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c)(4)(B) (see Betts v. … See Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156 , 94 S.Ct. 2140 , 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974). At this point it must be assumed that plaintiffs will be able to state a valid cause of action against the Board.

Johnson v. CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF PORTLAND

162 Or. App. 527 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1999

App. 527 Daryl JOHNSON, Appellant, v. CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF the CITY OF PORTLAND, Portland Parks and Recreation Bureau, and City of Portland, Respondents. (9610008072; CA A98841) Court of Appeals of Oregon. … Our disposition "Reversed and remanded," Johnson v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hendricks

282 Or. 763 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1978

There is other evidence to support the Trial Board’s findings. We concur in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of the Trial Board. … In re Brown, 277 Or 121, 134 , 559 P2d 884 (1977). The accused should have disclosed his proposed dealings with the Grahams to the other members of the law firm by whom he was employed.

Oregon & Washington Mortgage Savings Bank v. Jordan

16 Or. 113 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1888

City of Davenport, 17 Iowa, 379 ; Merrill v. Gorham, 6 Cal. 41 ; Porter v. R. 1. & St. L. R. R. Co. 76 Ill. 561 ; 2 Desty on Taxation, 661; Waterbury Savings Bank v. Lawler, 46 Conn. 243 ; Seeley v. … In reaching the conclusion indicated, we have not overlooked Dalton v. East Portland, 11 Or. 426 ; Stingle v. Nevel, 9 Or. 62 ; or Brown v. School District No. 1, 12 Or. 345 .

Morrow v. Pacific University

100 Or. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 17, 1990

.* * *’” James v. SAIF, 290 Or 343, 348 , 624 P2d 565 (1980); Donald Drake Co. v. Lundmark, 63 Or App 261, 266 , 663 P2d 1303 (1983), rev den 296 Or 350 (1984). … On remand, the Board should view the claim as one for an injury and determine if claimant’s job was a material contributing cause of her disability. Harris v. Albertson’s Inc., 65 Or App 254, 257 , 670 P2d 1059 (1983).

Murphy v. Goss

103 F. Supp. 3d 1234 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 16, 2015

Brown v. Presbyterian Healthcare Servs., 101 F.3d 1324 , 1333 (10th Cir.1996). … Brown, 101 F.3d at 1334; Ritten v. Lapeer Regional Med. Cntr., 611 F.Supp.2d 696, 733 (E.D.Mich.2009).

Rogue Advocates v. Board of Comm. of Jackson County

Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2017

Rogue Advocates v. Board of Comm. of Jackson County, 277 Or App 651, 372 P3d 587 (2016). … Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (S42159), 325 Or 185, 192, 935 P2d 411 (1997).

Kephart v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.

12 Or. App. 299 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1973

Browne, who treated the claimant for some time prior to the date of the claimed injury—in fact, seeing him just one day before; Dr. Rockey, who saw the claimant in the hospital on September 20; and Dr. … The Workmen’s Compensation *301 Board again reversed the hearing officer.

Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 29, 2025

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON BEAU EDWARD BROWN, 2:24-cv-00927-CL Plaintiff, VS. … will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees and costs, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v.

Sachdev v. Or. Med. Bd.

292 Or. App. 778 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 18, 2018

To supplement that definition, the board turned to the Supreme Court's decision in Coffey v. … See State v.

Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 22, 2025

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MACKENZIE BROWN, Case No. 3:24-cv-01353-SB Plaintiff, vs. … attorney fee will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v.

Eagle Point Irrigation District v. Cowden

137 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1931

The fund itself is state property and, as stated in State Land Board v. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

Penk v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

99 F.R.D. 497 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 28, 1982

See Oatis v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., 398 F.2d 496 (5th Cir.1968); Vuyanich v. Republic National Bank of Dallas, 505 F.Supp. 224 (N.D.Tex.1980). … In American Pipe & Construction Co. v.

Penk v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

99 F.R.D. 495 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 12, 1982

CLASS DATE The Ninth Circuit has not been consistent on the issue of retroactive application of Mohasco v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807 , 100 S.Ct. 2486 , 65 L.Ed.2d 532 (1980). Cf. William v. … Owens-Illinois, Inc., 665 F.2d 918 , 924 n. 2 (9th Cir.1982) and Wiltshire v. Standard Oil Co. of California, 652 F.2d 837 (9th Cir.1981) with Roberts v. Arizona Board of Regents, 661 F.2d 796, 798-99 (9th Cir.1981).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Griffith

304 Or. 575 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1987

State ex rel. v. Arnold, 145 Or 634, 639 , 28 P.2d 846 . … Corp. v.

State v. Cross

316 Or. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 2021

Miller, 363 Or at 377 (internal citations omitted); see also State v. … Id. at 539; see also State v.

Penk v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

99 F.R.D. 504 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 28, 1982

The claim of plaintiffs in this action is that certain Board policies and practices filter down through local institutional and departmental decisionmaking processes and result in discrimination against women. … See Stevenson v. General Electric Co., 26 F.R.Serv.2d 574 (S.D.Ohio 1978), Smith v. Community Federal Savings & Loan Association of Tupelo, 77 F.R.D. 668 (N.D.Miss.1977); see generally 4 J. Moore & J.

Marberry v. Board of Parole

336 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 27, 2024

Affirmed. 468 Marberry v. Board of Parole EGAN, J. … Tuckenberry v. Board of Parole, 365 Or 640, 652, 451 P3d 227 (2019).