Case law

Coghill v. Millworks

125 Or. App. 57 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1993

However, the Board was not required to accept the referee’s credibility assessments, or even to address them. See Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile, 311 Or 519, 526-527 , 815 P2d 1251 (1991). … Our only responsibility in reviewing the Board’s order is to determine whether it is supported by substantial evidence. Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile, supra.

Bullseye Glass Co. v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 9, 2019

See Thomas v. … .”); United States. v.

Barton v. Board of Parole

344 Or. App. 636 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 5, 2025

See Jacobs v. Board of Parole, 342 Or App 41, 49, 577 P3d 338 (2025) (“We review the board’s order for substantial evidence in the record. … See 640 Barton v. Board of Parole Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v.

Pierce v. Board of Parole

345 Or. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 19, 2025

Additionally, the substantial evidence standard requires that the board’s orders be based on substantial reason. See Martin v. … to determine 138 Pierce v.

Spain v. Jones

257 Or. App. 777 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 7, 2013

Id. at 328 . *786 We discussed Yowell in Brown v. Boise-Cascade Corp., 150 Or App 391 , 946 P2d 324 (1997), rev den, 327 Or 317 (1998). … George v.

Wtw Development, LLC v. Board of County Com'rs of Josephine County

342 Or. 254 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2006

149 P.3d 1213 (2006) 342 Or. 254 WTW Development, LLC v. Board of County Com'rs of Josephine County No. S54257. Supreme Court of Oregon. December 27, 2006. Petitions for review Denied.

Castle & Cook, Inc. v. Porras

103 Or. App. 65 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 1990

On claimant’s petition for review, we remanded to the Board for reconsideration in *68 the light of the substantial evidence standard of review. Porras v. Castle & Cook, Inc., 91 Or App 526 , 755 P2d 154 (1988). … Under that legal standard, the Board made a factual finding, which we review for substantial evidence support. Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 591 , 763 P2d 408 (1988).

Smith v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd.

364 Or. 535 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 2019

Vedder v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 139 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 4, 2025

Affirmed. 140 Vedder v. Board of Parole KAMINS, J. … 142 Vedder v.

McCoin v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd.

295 Or. App. 789 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 16, 2019

Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. Deboard (In re Deboard)

291 Or. App. 742 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 16, 2018

However, in analyzing the compensability of the claim, the board cited our opinion in Brown v. SAIF , 262 Or. … Our opinion in Brown has been reversed. *749 Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 391 P.3d 773 (2017).

Tattoo v. Barrett Business Service

118 Or. App. 348 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 24, 1993

See Boise Cascade Corp. v. Hasslen, 108 Or App 605 , 816 P2d 1181 (1991); Green Thumb, Inc. v. Basl, 106 Or App 98, 806 P2d 186 (1991); Evanite Fiber Corp. v. Striplin, supra. … Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588 , 763 P2d 408 (1988). The correct legal inquiry is whether the employer had a legitimate doubt as to its liability.

Housing Authority & Urban Renewal Agency v. Lane County Board of Commissioners

35 Or. App. 785 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 1978

Lane County v. Heintz Const. Co. et al, 228 Or 152, 160 , 364 *792 P2d 627 (1961); Holman Tfr. Co. et al. v. Portland et al., 196 Or 551, 564-65 , 249 P2d 175 , 250 P2d 929 (1952). This is such a case. … "(b) Appointing, by resolution, a board or commission composed of not less than three members to exercise the powers of an urban renewal agency under this chapter.

A. J. Rose & Son, Inc. v. Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers

31 Or. App. 537 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 1977

The Board has no rules relating to the activities at issue here. … Abbot v. Bob’s U-Drive, 222 Or 147, 162 , 352 P2d 598 , 81 ALR2d 793 (1960). The only evidence is that Hollywood Investment purchased for a valuable consideration the assets, name and good will of A. J.

Kennedy v. Eden Advanced Pest Technologies

222 Or. App. 431 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 1, 2008

On appeal, plaintiff argues that Rea’s testimony was admissible as scientific evidence under the tests set out in the seminal cases of State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), State v. … System, 132 F3d 599 (10th Cir 1997); Bradley v. Brown, 42 F3d 434 (7th Cir 1994); Brown v. Shalala, 15 F3d 97 (8th Cir 1994); Coffey v. County of Hennepin, 23 F Supp 2d 1081 (D Minn 1998); Frank v.

Hutchison v. Toews

4 Or. App. 19 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 1970

In Nikkila v. … Costello, 229 SW 411 (Mo 1921); Wilhelm v. Board of Education of City of New York, 16 App Div 2d 707, 227 NYS2d 791 (1962).

Clardy v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 211 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 4, 2025

We review a board order “for legal error, substantial evidence, and substantial reason.” Bell v. Board of Parole, 283 Or App 711, 713, 391 P3d 907, rev den, 361 Or 645 (2017). … Guzek v. Board of Parole, 325 Or App 795, 804, 530 P3d 510, rev den, 371 Or 476 (2023).

Browning v. C & C PLYWOOD CORP.

248 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1967

The plan was consummated at a special meeting of the Board of Directors held on February 11, 1963, immediately following the expiration of the pre-emptive right period; the design to eliminate Browning was completed. … The relief to which Browning is entitled presents a difficult problem.

Eugene Water & Elec. Bd. v. Pub. Emps. Ret. Bd. & John T. Wigle

365 Or. 59 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 2019

See Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 254, 391 P.3d 773 (2017) (turning to "the relevant statutes in context to determine the interpretation that best fits the statutory scheme as a whole " (emphasis in original)). … Engweiler v.

Oregon & Washington Mortgage Savings Bank v. Jordan

16 Or. 113 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1888

City of Davenport, 17 Iowa, 379 ; Merrill v. Gorham, 6 Cal. 41 ; Porter v. R. 1. & St. L. R. R. Co. 76 Ill. 561 ; 2 Desty on Taxation, 661; Waterbury Savings Bank v. Lawler, 46 Conn. 243 ; Seeley v. … In reaching the conclusion indicated, we have not overlooked Dalton v. East Portland, 11 Or. 426 ; Stingle v. Nevel, 9 Or. 62 ; or Brown v. School District No. 1, 12 Or. 345 .