Case law

Price v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

542 A.2d 1249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1988

Jones v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 375 A.2d 1, 5-6 (D.C.1977). See also Coakley v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 370 A.2d 1345 (D.C.1977). … See Dowd v. District of Columbia Police and Firefighters Retirement & Relief Bd., 485 A.2d 212, 215 (D.C.1984); Kirkwood v.

Citizens Coalition v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

619 A.2d 940 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1993

In Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. … Co. v.

Bausch v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

855 A.2d 1121 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2004

Epstein, Becker & Green v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 812 A.2d 901, 902-03 (D.C.2002). … See Long v. District of Columbia Police and Firefighters Retirement and Relief Board, 728 A.2d 112, 115 (D.C.1999).

B. Willis, C.P.A., Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

51 F. App'x 321 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 26, 2002

The Board argues that § 10501(a) is the only provision granting the Board jurisdiction, and that § 10501(b) does not expand the Board’s jurisdiction, but only renders the jurisdiction granted in § 10501(a) exclusive. … This interpretation is implausible on its face, and the Board, in determining that it has no jurisdiction over private tracks, has rejected it. See Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. FERC, 28 F.3d 1281 , 1284 (D.C.Cir.1994).

Elam v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF DC

530 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2007

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Board of Curators, Univ. of Mo. v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. [78, 89-90, 98 S.Ct. 948 , 55 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978)]. Id. at 226 , 106 S.Ct. 507 .

Western Coal Traffic League v. Surface Transportation Board

169 F.3d 775 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 1999

Co. v. ICC, 736 F.2d 708 , 717 (D.C.Cir.1984). The Board’s balancing of the various competing interests under the public interest test is entitled to considerable deference. … Western Resources, Inc. v. STB, 109 F.3d 782 (D.C.Cir.1997) and Grainbelt Corp. v. STB, 109 F.3d 794 (D.C.Cir.1997). .

J.C. & Associates v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

778 A.2d 296 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 2001

Co. v. … McDaniels v. Brown, 740 A.2d 551 , 554 n. 4 (1999) (quoting Murphy v. McCloud, 650 A.2d 202, 205 (D.C.1994)). 4 .

Philips v. Department of the Navy

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2020

Philips believes there are discrepancies between Brown’s statements to the Navy’s review board and Brown’s testimony at trial. Id. at 31. … During this litigation, the Navy located Brown’s Physical Evaluation Board (“PEB”) file, which includes the requested Medical Evaluation Board file. See Marx Decl. ¶¶ 9–11 & n.1.

METROPOLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT.

141 A.3d 1079 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2016

See Kopff v. … The Board may ... conduct further hearings or ... even reach a different result.” Washington Ethical Soc. v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 421 A.2d 14, 19 (D.C.1980) (quoting Salsbery v.

Mathew Enterprise, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

498 F. App'x 45 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 14, 2012

Rather, “[t]he substantial evidence standard is not modified in any way when the Board and its examiner disagree.” Universal Camera Corp. v. … Greater Boston Television Corp. v.

Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Surface Transportation Board

638 F.3d 807 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 2011

“We review the [Board’s] interpretation of section 10901, a statute it is charged with enforcing, under the principles set forth in Chevron USA Inc. v. … In any event, that the Board has repeatedly interpreted the statute the same way for 20 years does indeed warrant deference. See Barnhart v.

Railroad Yardmasters of America v. Robert O. Harris, Chairman, National Mediation Board

721 F.2d 1332 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 16, 1983

Brown. 8 Later that day Member Brown resigned, leaving Member Harris as the only remaining member. … The YSC did not file an application with the Board until June 10, 1982, nine days after Chairman Brown’s retirement.” Railroad Yardmasters v. Harris, slip op. at 8, reprinted in J.A. 23.

Human Development Association v. National Labor Relations Board

937 F.2d 657 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1991

Corp. v. … Newspaper Guild, Local 82 v.

Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

837 F.2d 1123 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 22, 1988

Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, supra, at 477, 98 S.Ct. at 2462 . II. … [in] the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, for an order requiring the Board to remove such conservator ..., and the court shall upon the merits dismiss such action or direct the Board to remove such

Irontiger Logistics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

823 F.3d 696 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 2016

. & Presbyterian Hosp. v. NLRB, 649 F.3d 723, 730 (D.C. … See Crowley Marine Servs., Inc. v. NLRB, 234 F.3d 1295, 1297 (D.C. Cir. 2000). (We understand that the Board’s burden- shifting rule does not saddle the employer with a heavy burden.)

In Re Brown

709 A.2d 724 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1998

PER CURIAM: In this disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) has found that respondent, Erroll D. … Brown, violated Rule 8.4(d) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct (prohibiting conduct which seriously interferes with the administration of justice) and D.C.

Loyal Travel, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

578 F.2d 442 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 1978

578 F.2d 442 188 U.S.App.D.C. 200 Loyal Travel, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board No. 77-1492 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 6/21/78 1 C.A.B. AFFIRMED

Dorsey v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

648 A.2d 675 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1994

See Hessey v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections & Ethics, 601 A.2d 3, 9, 15 (D.C.1991) (en banc). … Since appellant has not furnished us with a transcript of that hearing, see Cobb v.

Jones v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

621 A.2d 385 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1993

Chevy Chase Citizens Ass’n v. … The Board’s characterization of their meeting with Mr. Chernoff as a "hearing” does not transform that informal session into a "quasi-judicial” or an "adjudicatory” tribunal. See United States, et al. v.

Board of Commissioners of Cherokee County, Kansas v. Kempthorne

956 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2013

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CHEROKEE COUNTY, KANSAS, Plaintiff, v. … In Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v.