Case law

Sociedad Nacional De Marineros De Honduras v. McCulloch

201 F. Supp. 82 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 1962

It was at first assumed that these Boards and Commissions were included entirely within the Executive branch of the Government. The Supreme Court in Humphrey’s Executor v. … Finally, reliance is placed on Vermilya-Brown Co. v.

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

340 F.2d 789 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 3, 1964

In fixing rates for a past period the Board may take into account actual experience. See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. … V, 1959-63). 2 .

Stanford Hospital & Clinics v. National Labor Relations Board

370 F.3d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2004

Ca. v. NLRB, 335 F.3d 1079, 1082–83 (D.C. Cir. 2003). Although we defer to the Board’s judgment regarding the proper scope of a bargaining unit, see South Prairie Constr. Co. v. … See Quick v. NLRB, 245 F.3d 231, 247 (3d Cir. 2001) (evidence of one occasion ‘‘is not evidence of ‘past practice’ ’’); see also Dallas Aerospace, Inc. v.

Wackenhut Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

178 F.3d 543 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 1999

.' " Pittsburgh Press Co. v. … Disabili- ties Servs. v. NLRB, 905 F.2d 476, 478 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (citation omitted)). We affirm the legal conclusions of the Board if they are "reasonably defensible." Ford Motor Co. v.

Honeywell International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

253 F.3d 125 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 2001

Edison v. NLRB, 460 U.S. 693, 703 (1983). … See Nolde Bros., Inc. v.

Union Pacific Railroad v. Surface Transportation Board

202 F.3d 337 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 15, 2000

In Mid American Energy Co. v. … for doing so, see Amax Land Co. v.

Davies v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

596 A.2d 992 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1991

See Citizens Against Legalized Gambling v. … Gollin v.

Long v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

728 A.2d 112 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1999

We must affirm the Board’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. See Szewczyk v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Ret. & Relief Bd., 633 A.2d 1, 1 (D.C.1993) (per curiam); Baumgartner v. … D.C.Code § 4-616(e)(2)(B)(v).

AEP Texas North Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

609 F.3d 432 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 18, 2010

Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, HENDERSON and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge SENTELLE. … However, because the Board acts “at the zenith of its powers” when it sets rail rates, Burlington N. R.R. Co. v. STB, 114 F.3d 206, 210 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (quoting Am. Trucking Ass’ns v.

Friends of the Field v. D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2024

Standard of Review “Our review of the Board of Zoning Adjustment’s decisions is generally deferential.” McDonald v. D.C. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 291 A.3d 1109, 1115 (D.C. 2023). … Roth v. D.C.

J.C. & Associates v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

778 A.2d 296 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 2001

Co. v. … McDaniels v. Brown, 740 A.2d 551 , 554 n. 4 (1999) (quoting Murphy v. McCloud, 650 A.2d 202, 205 (D.C.1994)). 4 .

In Re Pennington

921 A.2d 135 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 2007

Pennington] submitted another[, unrelated] Complaint, Brown v. Austin (hereinafter ‘Brown Complaint’), in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County Maryland. … Finally, the Maryland court noted that Pennington had been disciplined once before, see Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Pennington, 355 Md. 61 , 733 A.2d 1029 (1999), again a fact the Board did not mention. 4 .

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, District Lodge 64 v. National Labor Relations Board

50 F.3d 1088 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1995

Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co., 312 N.L.R.B. 444 , 445, 1993 WL 382495 (1993) (“Brown & Sharpe II”) (quoting Fitzgerald v. Seamans, 553 F.2d 220, 228 (D.C.Cir.1977)). … See, e.g., Hohri v.

Price v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

542 A.2d 1249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1988

Jones v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 375 A.2d 1, 5-6 (D.C.1977). See also Coakley v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen’s Retirement & Relief Board, 370 A.2d 1345 (D.C.1977). … See Dowd v. District of Columbia Police and Firefighters Retirement & Relief Bd., 485 A.2d 212, 215 (D.C.1984); Kirkwood v.

Citizens Coalition v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

619 A.2d 940 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1993

In Charlie Brown of Chatham, Inc. v. … Co. v.

Bausch v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

855 A.2d 1121 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2004

Epstein, Becker & Green v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 812 A.2d 901, 902-03 (D.C.2002). … See Long v. District of Columbia Police and Firefighters Retirement and Relief Board, 728 A.2d 112, 115 (D.C.1999).

Loyal Travel, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

578 F.2d 442 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 1978

578 F.2d 442 188 U.S.App.D.C. 200 Loyal Travel, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board No. 77-1492 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 6/21/78 1 C.A.B. AFFIRMED

Elam v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF DC

530 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2007

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Board of Curators, Univ. of Mo. v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. [78, 89-90, 98 S.Ct. 948 , 55 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978)]. Id. at 226 , 106 S.Ct. 507 .

Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

294 F.2d 235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 1961

294 F.2d 235 EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., Petitioner v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. … the Act requires it to do so." 15 We agree the Civil Aeronautics Act imposes the stated duty upon the Board. 7 Our recent decision in Minneapolis Gas Co. v.

Western Coal Traffic League v. Surface Transportation Board

169 F.3d 775 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 1999

Co. v. ICC, 736 F.2d 708 , 717 (D.C.Cir.1984). The Board’s balancing of the various competing interests under the public interest test is entitled to considerable deference. … Western Resources, Inc. v. STB, 109 F.3d 782 (D.C.Cir.1997) and Grainbelt Corp. v. STB, 109 F.3d 794 (D.C.Cir.1997). .