Case law

District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. Jones

495 A.2d 752 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 1985

Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 441 A.2d 889 (D.C.1981) (en banc). … District of Columbia v. Jones, 481 A.2d 456 (D.C.1984).

Sandula v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

979 A.2d 32 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2009

Hosp. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 916 A.2d 149, 151 (D.C.2007) (citing Dietrich v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 293 A.2d 470, 473 (D.C.1972); Gay v. … Bochner's substantial medical experience recognized in either the Board’s findings of fact or its conclusions of law. We find these omissions troubling. Cf. Eilers v.

Miller v. Board of Education of District of Columbia

106 F. Supp. 988 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 3, 1952

The constitutional validity of the separation of races in the public schools of the District has been upheld in Carr v. … Gaines v.

Shaw v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

936 A.2d 800 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2007

In calculating an annuity, the Retirement Board considers the average salary for positions that the disabled petitioner “has the capacity to occupy.” Breen v. … Moreover, the Board rested its decision on its finding that Shaw could perform the activities described by the Enhanced Guide, and we are not at liberty to uphold the Board on a different rationale. See Pierce v.

Cocome v. District of Columbia Lottery & Charitable Games Control Board

560 A.2d 547 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1989

In so finding, OEA relied on Christie v. … See generally Scharf v.

Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board

146 F.3d 942 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1998

Co. v. … Action Network v.

Oakland Condominium v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

22 A.3d 748 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 2011

The Board urges us to affirm its determination that there existed an “exceptional condition,” in accordance with Monaco as well as De Azcarate v. … Custodial Servs. v.

Charlton County Board of Education v. United States

459 F. Supp. 530 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 24, 1978

Ray James, Superintendent of Schools for the Charlton County Board of Education (Aug. 7, 1978). 22 . See, e. g., Chase Nat’l Bank v. … The Government cites Board of Educ. v. South Mich. Nat’l Bank of Coldwater, 184 Ga. 641 , 192 S.E. 382 (1937); Foster v. Cobb County Bd. of Educ., 133 Ga.App. 768 , 213 S.E.2d 38 (1975). 37 .

In Re Rigas

9 A.3d 494 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 2010

In re Delaney, 697 A.2d 1212, 1214 (D.C.1997) (quotation marks omitted); see also In re Brown, 851 A.2d 1278, 1279 (D.C.2004) (per curiam) (same). 1 We therefore accept the Board’s Report and Recommendation approving the … See, e.g., In re Belardi, 891 A.2d 224, 224 (D.C.2006) (one-year suspension for pleading guilty to three counts of making false statements to a government agency); In re Brown, 851 A.2d 1278, 1279 (D.C.2004) (one-year suspension

Hall v. District of Columbia Board of Elections

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2024

Board of Elections. … Food and Water Watch, Inc. v. Vilsack, 808 F.3d 905, 913 (D.C. Cir. 2015); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

British Overseas Airways Corp. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

304 F.2d 952 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 1962

See Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103 , 68 S.Ct. 431 , 92 L. Ed. 668 , interpreting the identical provision of the Civil Aeronautics Act, § 1006(a), formerly 49 U.S.C.A. § 646 .

Halle Enterprises, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

247 F.3d 268 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 2001

See Darr v. NLRB, 801 F.2d 1404, 1407 (D.C. … Time Warner Cable v. NLRB, 160 F.3d 1, 3 (D.C. Cir. 1998). We conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the Board's finding.

Croskey v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

596 A.2d 988 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 1991

See Batty v. … Baumgartner v.

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

539 F.2d 748 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1976

As this court held in Air Line Pilots Ass’n, Int’l v. … Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. CAB, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 290 , 261 F.2d 754 , 756 (1958), cert. denied, sub nom. Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959). .

Roy v. U. S. Board of Parole

559 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1977

559 F.2d 188 181 U.S.App.D.C. 411 Roy v. U. S. Board of Parole No. 76-1600 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 6/24/77 1 D.C.D.C. VACATED AND REMANDED

National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

306 F.2d 753 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 24, 1962

Federal Communications Comm’n [ 71 App.D.C. 11 , 107 F.2d 212 (1939)], Federal Communications Comm’n v. Sanders Radio Station [ 309 U.S. 470 , 60 S.Ct. 693 , 84 L.Ed. 869 (1940)], Alton R. [Co.] v. … The Board has safeguarded the rights of petitioners in the proceeding under Docket 11620, as evidenced by ft 2 of Order No. E-17811, supra. See American Trucking Assn’s v.

Commonwealth Communications, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

312 F.3d 465 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 13, 2002

Analysis This court owes no deference to the Board’s interpretation of a disputed collective bargaining agreement. BP Amoco Corp. v. NLRB, 217 F.3d 869, 873 (D.C.Cir.2000); Wilson & Sons Heating & Plumbing, Inc. v. … Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO v. U.S. Postal Serv., 940 F.2d 704, 707-08 (D.C.Cir.1991); Appalachian Power Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 529 F.2d 342 , 347-48 (D.C.Cir.1976); News Union of Baltimore v.

Jewell v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

738 A.2d 1228 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1999

The Board is required to give “due regard” to “the capacity of the [police officer] to earn wages or engage in gainful activity,” among other factors. D.C.Code § <N616(e)(2)(B)(v). … The Board argues that Jewell failed to challenge the use of this job as beyond her skills and therefore, it should not be considered on appeal. See Glenbrook Rd. Ass’n v.

International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, AFL v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. B.V.D. Company, Inc.

237 F.2d 545 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 3, 1956

It decided in National Labor Relations Board v. … Pre-amendment decisions: Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 3 Cir., 1939, 107 F.2d 472, 479 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Ozark Automotive Distributors, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

779 F.3d 576 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 10, 2015

Milakshmi V. Rajapakse, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. … Unable to seek direct review of the Board’s certification decision, see Boire v.