Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

2.71s

  • McCormick v. Brown

    356 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 19, 2014

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Pat McCORMICK and Scott Dahlman, Petitioners, v. … Appellate judgment to issue forthwith. 2 McCormick v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Sheedy

    90 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1918

    Justice Lord in Galvin v. … Chief Justice Bean, in Reynolds v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mills

    350 Or. 716 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 2011

    260 P.3d 493 (2011) 350 Or. 716 BROWN v. MILLS. (S059407). Supreme Court of Oregon. September 15, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Eoff

    271 Or. 7 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1975

    In the essentially similar case of Shepard v. Purvine, ⑥ plaintiffs and defendants likewise disagreed on the duration of the license that admittedly had been given. … Plaintiff testified in answer to a question on whether the escrow had been completed: “No, I don’t think so.” ④ Heisley v. Eastman, 102 Or 137 , 201 P 872 (1921). ⑤ Id.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Hazell v. Brown

    350 Or. 573 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 18, 2011

    258 P.3d 1239 (2011) 350 Or. 573 HAZELL v. BROWN. (S059245). Supreme Court of Oregon. August 18, 2011. Petition for Review Allowed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    316 Or. App. 808 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 2022

    State v. Hedgpeth, 365 Or 724, 730, 452 P3d 948 (2019); State v. … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    132 Or. App. 443 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1995

    State v. Orsi/Gauthier, 108 Or App 176, 180 , 813 P2d 82 (1991); see also State v. Drake, 113 Or App 16 , 832 P2d 44 (1992). … The dissent then *448 asserts that even if defendant “did not make the particular argument to the trial court that he makes here, [State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. CARONAN

    245 Or. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 10, 2011

    App. 165 BROWN v. CARONAN. No. A143172. Court of Appeals of Oregon. August 10, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    246 Or. App. 576 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 2, 2011

    App. 576 STATE v. BROWN. A143444 Court of Appeals of Oregon. November 2, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Gatti

    240 Or. App. 519 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 2011

    Brown v. Gatti, 195 Or App 695, 698-99 , 99 P3d 299 (2004) (Brown I). … Brown v. Gatti, 341 Or 452, 457 , 145 P3d 130 (2006) (Brown II).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Moss

    53 Or. 518 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1909

    has not been executed in the form required by law to entitle, it to record, it may be that its proof cannot be made by a certified copy, and that the spreading of it upon the record of the county is a nullity: Musgrove v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ritterman

    156 Or. 405 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1937

    In Schultz v. Walrad, 92 Or. 315 ( 179 P. 904, 991 ), it was held that the court had no jurisdiction to extend the time for filing of the transcript on appeal until a notice of appeal had been served, citing Wolf v. … In Hay v. Yokell, 147 Or. 148 ( 32 P. (2d) 578 ), the plaintiff served and filed notice of appeal on May 26, 1933.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    9 Or. App. 137 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 30, 1972

    Miranda v. Arizona, supra, requires that the warning be given where pretrial statements offered against a defendant result from custodial interrogation by the police. … Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485 , 443 P2d 621 (1968). Affirmed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    241 Or. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 2011

    On appeal, defendant contends that, under State v. … Instead, relying primarily on our decision in State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    243 Or. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 8, 2011

    App. 389 STATE v. BROWN. A144408 Court of Appeals of Oregon. June 8, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    82 Or. App. 256 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1986

    State v. Hunter, 58 Or App 99, 110 , 647 P2d 943 (1982), rev den 294 Or 391 (1983). ORS 161.735 requires the court to consider the presentence report and the evidence in the case, as well as the psychiatric report. … See State v. McCormick, 80 Or App 191 , 721 P2d 471 , rev den 302 Or 86 (1986). Judgments modified by vacating sentences for the underlying felonies; affirmed as modified.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sappington v. Brown

    68 Or. App. 72 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 9, 1984

    See, generally, Huszar v. Certified Realty Co., 266 Or 614, 621 , 512 P2d 982 (1973); Alk v. Lanini, 61 Or App 158, 163 , 656 P2d 367 (1982), rev den 294 Or 613 (1983). … Falk v. Amsberry, 290 Or 839, 843 , 626 P2d 362 (1981).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. BELLEQUE

    349 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2010

    246 P.3d 482 (2010) 349 Or. 370 BROWN v. BELLEQUE. (S058820). Supreme Court of Oregon. December 9, 2010. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cahalin

    3 Or. 45 · Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · Jun 15, 1868

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. BELLEQUE

    350 Or. 230 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 2011

    253 P.3d 1079 (2011) 350 Or. 230 BROWN v. BELLEQUE. (S059260). Supreme Court of Oregon. April 7, 2011. Petition for Review Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.