Case law

State v. Brown

804 S.E.2d 520 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 28, 2017

Brown v. . Rickard

107 N.C. 639 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

Waugh v. Richardson, 8 Ired., 470 ; McCormick v. Monroe, 1 Jones, 13; Melton v. Monday, 64 N. C., 295 , throw light in this connection on the subject of void and valid exceptions in grants.

State v. Brown

250 N.C. 54 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 8, 1959

In Ornoff v. … In City of New Orleans v.

Purdy v. Brown

307 N.C. 93 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1982

See, e.g., Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. … Couch v. Couch, 18 N.C. App. 108 , 196 S.E. 2d 64 (1973); State v. Johnson, 282 N.C. 1 , 191 S.E. 2d 641 (1972).

State v. . Brown

76 N.C. 222 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1877

Luther v. Skeen, 8 Jones, 356 ; State v. Oscar, 7 Jones, *226 305. … State v. Johnson, 1 Winst., 238; State v. Smith, 2 Ire. 402.

State v. Brown

217 N.C. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2011

State v. Brown, 142 N.C. App. 491, 493 , 543 S.E.2d 192, 193 (2001). … In State v. Choplek, _ N.C.

Sinnett v. Sinnett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2025

See State v. … See McConnell v. McConnell, 151 N.C. App. 622, 629-30, 566 S.E.2d 801, 806 (2002) (“Though [the] plaintiff relies on Brewer v. Brewer, 139 N.C.App. 222, 533 S.E.2d 541 (2000) and Browning v.

Harrison v. . Brown

222 N.C. 610 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1943

Co. v. Carolina Beach, 216 N. C., 778 (789), 7 S. … Mortgage Co. v. Winston-Salem, 216 N. C., 126 , 6 S. E. (2d), 501 . Tbe general rule is stated in 8 Am.

Roughton v. . Brown

53 N.C. 393 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1861

See 2nd Tidd’s Practice, 1186, and Lassiter v. Harper, 10 Ire. 392. 2. … Raymond, 71, Oarth. 8 ; Sharpe v.

Lea v. . Brown

56 N.C. 141 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1857

Brown nor his successor were the *147 objects of the testator’s bounty, and were but “nominal do-nees.” Sorry v. Bright, 1 Dev. and Bat. Eq. 113. … In Pippin v. Ellison, supra, and Lowe v.

State v. . Brown

106 N.C. 645 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

The validity of that act, and the sufficiency of an indictment drawn in accordance with it, were sustained by this Court in State v. Moore, 104 N. C., 743 . We cite that case and affirm it as to this point. No error.

Bell v. . Brown

227 N.C. 319 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1947

Brown, from the option dated 25 September, 1943, and whether or not tbe signature of tbe defendant, Gladys B. Brown, to tbe option and lease, was obtained by false and fraudulent representations. … C., 321 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 112 N. C., 27 ; Holden v. Purefoy, 108 N. C., 163 ; Riley v. Jordan, 75 N. C., 180 ; Gorrell v. Alspaugh, 120 N. C., 362 .” Faust v. Rohr, supra; Public Utilities Co. v. Bessemer City, 173 N.

Brown v. Hodges

232 N.C. 537 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 1, 1950

Reed v. Shenck, supra; Gause v. Perkins, supra. … Cherry v. Slade, 7 N.C. 82; Hill v. Dalton, supra; Bowen v. Lumber Co., 153 N.C. 366 , 69 S.E. 258 .

State v. Brown

794 S.E.2d 338 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 2016

Barnes v. . Brown

71 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

In Camp v. Cox, 1 D. & B., 62, it was held that a mortgagee cannot sell the equity of redemption under execution for the mortgage debt. It was doubted in that case, and also in Thompson v. … Albea v. Griffin, 2 D. & B. Eq., 9; Winton v. Fort, 5 Jones Eq., 251 .

State v. Brown

249 N.C. 271 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1958

In S. v. … Burnett v. R.R., 120 N.C. 517 , 26 S.E. 819 , cited in numerous later cases. See Shepherd’s Annotations. See also Gregg v. Mallett, 111 N.C. 74 , 15 S.E. 936 ; S. v. McKinney, 111 N.C. 683 , 16 S.E. 235 ; S. v.

Griffin v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 2026

Brown; (2) corporate -7-  GRIFFIN V. … GRIFFIN V.

Chavis v. . Brown

174 N.C. 122 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1917

Cox v. Boyden, 167 N. C., 320 ; Massie.v. Hainey, 165 N. C., 174 ; Bank v. Ewen, 160 N. C., 414 ; Roberts v. Pratt, 152 N. C., 731 . … Bank v. McEwen, 160 N. C., 414 -423; Morris v. Grier, 76 N. C., 410 ; Moye v. Cogdell, 69 N. C., 93 .

Brown v. . Polk

201 N.C. 375 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1931

Hawkins v. Hughes, 87 N. C., 115 . The causes of action are different in the two suits. … Nothing was said in Construction Co. v. Ice Co., 190 N. C., 580 , 130 S. E., 165 , or Allen v. Salley, 179 N. C., 147 , 101 S. E., 545 , which militates against our present position. Affirmed.

State v. Brown

146 N.C. App. 590 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2001

V, XIV, and the North Carolina Constitution, see N.C. Const. art. … Brown, 146 N.C. App. 299 , - S.E.2d -(Sept. 18, 2001) (No.