Case law

Jackson v. Brown

136 So. 2d 329 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1961

136 So.2d 329 (1961) Jerlean JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard E. BROWN, Administrator of the Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor of the State of Louisiana, et al., Defendants-Appellees. … Brown (La.App. 2d Cir, 1959), 115 So.2d 405 .

Brown v. Morgan

449 So. 2d 606 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1984

BROWN and Joan H. Brown Watson v. Thomas P. MORGAN. No. 83 CA 0597. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. April 3, 1984. Rehearing Denied May 21, 1984. *607 W. Hugh Sibley, Greensburg, for plaintiff-appellee. … Board of Commissioners of Port of New Orleans v. Louisiana Commission on Ethics for Public Employees, 416 So.2d 231 (La.App. 1st Cir.1982), writ denied, 421 So.2d 248 (La.1982).

Brown v. Chategnier

2016 La.App. 4 Cir. 0373 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 2016

Brown failed to properly preserve this issue for review on appeal. Williams v. … Brown as the domiciliary parent was an interim judgment only. “The primary consideration in a determination of child custody is the best interest of the child.” Mulkey v.

State v. Brown

338 So. 2d 686 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 6, 1976

338 So.2d 686 (1976) STATE of Louisiana v. Earnest C. BROWN. No. 58050. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 6, 1976. *687 Edward C. Keeton, Marrero, for defendant-appellant. William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. … State v. Phanor, 325 So.2d 579 (La.1976). One of the state witnesses, Lonnie Everett, testified that Brown was present when he "shot dope" at Brown's residence at approximately 5:00 p.m. on March 27, 1974.

State v. Brown

2011 La.App. 4 Cir. 0947 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 2012

In support, the State cites United States v. … Brown asserts. See State v. King, 10-2638 (La.5/6/11), 60 So.3d 615 ; State v. Batiste, 05-1571 (La.10/17/06), 939 So.2d 1245 ; State v. Lee, 11-0892 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1/18/12) , 80 So.3d 1292 ; State v.

Turner v. Brown

155 So. 2d 276 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 15, 1963

As stated in McGinnis v. … Broussard v. Administrator, La.App. 1 Cir., 121 So.2d 268 ; cf., Gladson v. Brown, La.App. 3 Cir., 134 So. 2d 660 .

Thompson v. Brown

157 So. 2d 239 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1963

Plaintiff appealed to the Board of Review for the Division of Employment Security, and the board /ifirmed the denial of benefits. Plaintiff then appealed to the district court. … The test as to whether an employee will be denied benefits by reason of discharge for misconduct is well stated in Sewell v.

Pawlak v. Brown

430 So. 2d 1346 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 13, 1983

PAWLAK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Lucien BROWN, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 82-692. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. April 13, 1983. … As this Court stated in Cobb v.

Brown v. Weldon.

199 So. 620 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1941

Plaintiffs are Volrey' Lacaze, the vendor and warrantor, and James Brown, Joseph P. Landry and R. S. … Pruyn v. Gay, 159 La. 981 , 106 So. 536 ; Southwestern Imp. Co. v. Whittington, La.App., 193 So. 483 .

Rogers v. Brown

416 So. 2d 624 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 15, 1982

416 So.2d 624 (1982) James ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas BROWN, M. D. et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 14901. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. June 15, 1982. … Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978); Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973).

Brown v. Smythe

40 La. Ann. 325 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 15, 1888

State v. Brown

302 So. 2d 290 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 28, 1974

302 So.2d 290 (1974) STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph A. BROWN and William Matthews. No. 54911. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 28, 1974. *291 James C. Dixon, Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellants. William J. … In State v.

Brown v. Vittur

47 La. Ann. 607 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 1, 1895

Another witness states that Brown came to him and said he wanted to use the shafting for rollers for moving a safe. … Brown ought to know it, because Mr. Brown put up that steam engine for me himself. He knows it very well if he wants to. The testimony of the defendant is substantiated by another witness, who says: Q.

Brown v. LaNasa

244 La. 314 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 25, 1963

Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as administrator of the state’s Division of Employment Security within the Department of Labor, instituted *317 these proceedings to collect from Dr. Joseph A. … Smith, Inc., 79 OhioApp. 469, 72 N.E.2d 397 ; State v. Praetorians, 143 Tex. 565 , 186 S.W.2d 973 , 158 A.L.R. 596 ; Maryland *321 Unemployment Compensation Board v. Albrecht, 183 Md. 87 , 36 A.2d 666 ; State ex rel.

Brown v. Frantum

6 La. 39 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 15, 1833

Brown v. Serpas

2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 1308 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 2013

Philips & Co., Inc. v. Barber, 150 La. 907 , 91 So. 293 (1922); Marino v. Marino, 576 So.2d 1196 (La.App. 5 Cir.1991); Selfe v. Travis, 29 So.2d 786 (La.App. 2 Cir.1947). … See Capital City Press, supra; Cormier v. Di Giulio, 553 So.2d 806 (La.1989). Relying on State v.

Brown v. Crockett

8 La. Ann. 30 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 15, 1853

In Burbeehaux v. … See DeKerlegand v. Robins, 1 Annual, 227. Parker v. Moore, 2 Annual, 1017. Judgment affirmed with costs.

Brown v. Green

133 La. 725 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 4, 1912

This point was directly decided in Hillard v. Taylor, 114 La. 890 , 38 South. 594 . … Day v. Bailey, 116 La. 962 , 41 South. 223 ; Succ. of Hardesty, 29 La. Ann. 289 . [3] Lastly, there can be no irreparable injury. There was sufficient irreparable injury to justify granting the appeal.

Brown v. Benjamin

120 So. 2d 325 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1960

The *329 troopers made an immediate comparison between the imprint on the board and the corresponding tires of the Benjamin trailer and testified, with absolute certainty, that the tread print on the board exactly matched … Under the factual circumstances prevailing in this case, we think it clearly comes within the exception noted under the long line of authority, beginning with Gaiennie v.

Brown v. Waller

8 So. 2d 304 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1942

When the case was called for trial below plaintiff's counsel informed the court that he had just discovered that plaintiff had developed a lapse of memory and had no recollection of what happened after he boarded the truck … Wirth v. Pokert, 19 La.App. 690 , 140 So. 234 ; Elliott v. Coreil, La.App., 158 So. 698 ; McDonald v. Stellwagon, La.App., 140 So. 133 .