Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMA

10,000+ results

1.40s

  • Columbia Pontiac Co. v. Board of Assessors

    395 Mass. 1010 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Aug 12, 1985

    Payment of the full amount of the tax due without incurring interest charges “is a condition precedent to the board’s jurisdiction over an abatement appeal.” Stilson v. … Massachusetts Pike Towers Assocs. v. Commissioner of Revenue, 381 Mass. 584, 585 (1980), quoting Belt Realty Corp. v. State Tax Comm’n, 363 Mass. 52, 56-57 (1973).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Chairperson of Massachusetts Parole Board

    454 Mass. 1018 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Aug 18, 2009

    The Massachusetts Parole Board (board) notified each plaintiff that, “due to your status on parole for a sex offense(s) and/or community parole supervision for life,” he would be subject to GPS monitoring as of December 21 … Lighting Plant v. Massachusetts Mun. Wholesale Elec. Co., 399 Mass. 640, 642 (1987), citing Packaging Indus. Group, Inc. v. Cheney, 380 Mass. 609, 615 (1980). In Commonwealth v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Haverhill Retirement System v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

    82 Mass. App. Ct. 129 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jul 11, 2012

    Board of Health of Granby, 444 Mass. 627, 633 (2005) (determining authority of State housing appeal committee). … Goldberg v. Board of Health of Granby, supra at 634 (upholding agency regulations). “We interpret a statute to give effect to the Legislature’s intent.” Boston Retirement Bd. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Donovan v. State Board of Labor & Industries

    225 Mass. 410 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 3, 1917

    as a member of the board. … Attorney General v. Loomis, ante, 372.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Breare v. Board of Assessors of Peabody

    350 Mass. 391 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 9, 1966

    See Fuller v. Wilbur, 170 Mass. 506, 507 ; Tinkham v. … The decision of the Appellate Tax Board is reversed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Harvard Square Defense Fund, Inc. v. Planning Board

    27 Mass. App. Ct. 491 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jun 22, 1989

    Carr v. Board of Appeals of Medford, 334 Mass. 77, 80 (1956). … See Brown v. Neelon, 335 Mass. 357, 359-360 (1957); Lawrence v. Falzarano, 380 Mass. 18 , 25 n.10 (1980). This argument was not made to the judge and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. John B. Deary, Inc. v.

    Cited 77 timesPublished
  • Building Commissioner v. Building Code Appeals Board

    34 Mass. App. Ct. 696 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jul 1, 1993

    See Blake v. Massachusetts Parole Bd., 369 Mass. 701, 707 (1976). … Wellesley College v. Attorney Gen., 313 Mass. 722, 731 (1943).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Golubek v. Westfield Gas & Electric Light Board

    32 Mass. App. Ct. 954 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · May 15, 1992

    Commonwealth v. Oliver, 342 Mass. 82, 85 (1961). By reason of that subordinate relationship, the board “could frame such general regulations concerning the exercise by . . . … See Municipal Light Commn. of Taunton v. Taunton, 323 Mass. 79, 84 (1948). The board has not argued the remaining issue of the board’s adoption of a hiring policy, and thus we are not obliged to consider the issue.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sherman v. Board of Selectmen of Orleans

    355 Mass. 786 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 6, 1969

    This is an appeal from a judgment in the Superior Court denying a petition for a writ of certiorari to review action of the board of selectmen (board). … Corp. v. Commissioner of Pub. Safety, 260 Mass. 548 . This we decline to do. Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Elmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Boston

    343 Mass. 24 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 14, 1961

    Bradley v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Boston, 255 Mass. 160,173 . … Compare McHugh v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Boston, 336 Mass. 682, 686 ; Shapiro v. Cambridge, 340 Mass. 652 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Coolidge v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Framingham

    343 Mass. 742 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 9, 1962

    Board of Appeal of Boston, 319 Mass. 180, 184 ; Cary v. Board of Appeals of Worcester, 340 Mass. 748, 751 . … The board’s “limited and carefully restricted variance power, Benjamin v. Board of Appeals of Swansea, 338 Mass. 257, 261 , may not be invoked for this purpose.” Shacka v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Town of Arlington v. Board of Conciliation & Arbitration

    370 Mass. 769 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Aug 10, 1976

    We made it plain in Board of Appeals of Hanover v. Housing Appeals Comm. in the Dep’t of Community Affairs, supra, and in Bloom v. … See Sailors v. Board of Educ. of the County of Kent, 387 U.S. 105 , 108-110 (1987). See also Moore v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • O'Connell v. City of Brockton Board of Appeals

    344 Mass. 208 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 20, 1962

    See Slack v. Inspector of Buildings of Wellesley, 262 Mass. 404 . … Commonwealth v. Carpenter, 325 Mass. 519, 521 , and cases cited. The foregoing analysis demonstrates that this setback ordinance belongs to this class. See Gorieb v. Fox, 274 U. S. 603, 605-606 . 2.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Loring Hills Developers Trust v. Planning Board

    5 Mass. App. Ct. 813 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Apr 19, 1977

    Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Randolph, 340 *814 Mass. 149 (1959), Clark v. Water & Sewer Commrs. of Norwood, 353 Mass. 708 (1968), P & D Serv. Co. Inc. v. … L. c. 41, § 81Q, against planning board regulations relating “to the size, shape, width, frontage or use of lots within a subdivision, or to the buildings which may be constructed thereon” (Cf. Chira v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jack v. Board of Appeal of Boston

    15 Mass. App. Ct. 311 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 15, 1983

    See Josephs v. … See Kasper v. Board of Appeals of Watertown, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 251, 253-258 (1975). See also Ranney v. Board of Appeals of Nantucket, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 112, 114-115 (1981); Gamache v. Acushnet, 14 Mass. App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Amberwood Development Corp. v. Board of Appeals

    65 Mass. App. Ct. 205 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Nov 29, 2005

    See Craig v. Planning Board of Haverhill, 64 Mass. App. Ct. 677, 679 (2005); G. L. c. 41, § 81U. Compare Martin v. Board of Appeals of Yarmouth, 20 Mass. App. Ct. 972 (1985); Maurice Callahan & Sons, Inc. v. … Board of Appeals of Lenox, 30 Mass. App. Ct. 36, 40 (1991); Perez v. Board of Appeals of Norwood, 54 Mass. App. Ct. 139 (2002) (self-inflicted hardship does not ordinarily constitute “substantial” hardship under G.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McIntyre v. Board of Selectmen of Ashby

    31 Mass. App. Ct. 735 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jan 6, 1992

    Goodwin v. Selectmen of Hopkinton, 358 Mass. 164, 170 (1970) (citations omitted). As explained in Toda v. Board of Appeals of Manchester, 18 Mass. App. … Glacier Sand & Stone Co. v. Board of Appeals of Westwood, 362 Mass. 239 (1972).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Orcutt v. Board of Health

    22 Mass. L. Rptr. 60 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Jan 4, 2007

    See G.L.c. 249, §4; MacHenry v. … See Pyramid Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Health of Holbrook v. Nelson

    351 Mass. 17 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 6, 1966

    The site was never assigned as a dumping ground by the board of health. The town’s fire chief, acting under G. … Lincoln v. Giles, 317 Mass. 185, 187 . See Everett v. Capitol Motor Transp. Co. Inc. 330 Mass. 417, 421 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Guzman v. Board of Assessors of Oxford

    24 Mass. App. Ct. 118 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · May 1, 1987

    See Harborview Residents’ Comm., Inc. v. … L. c. 249, § 4; it may not lodge in the Appellate Tax Board. Assessors of Saugus v. Baumann, 370 Mass. 36, 37 (1976). See Burbridge v. Assessors of Lexington, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 546, 547 (1981).

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.