Case law

Jameson v. Hall

37 Md. 221 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 20, 1872

. *232 It is surely unnecessary to refer to authority for a rule of evidence so well established, and subject to but few exceptions, that the acts and declarations of the parties to a cause cannot be given in evidence in … Acts and declarations, indicating the purpose and intention thereof, by whomsoever done or made, are admissible as res gestee, if relevant to the matter in issue; but if they are irrelevant, the declarations qualifying or

Communications Equipment Workers, Inc. v. Western Electric Co.

320 F. Supp. 1277 · District Court, D. Maryland · Nov 16, 1970

A court should, however, interfere where the arbitrator (a) clearly went beyond the scope of the submission, Textile Workers Union of Am. v. … The Company clearly placed it there because it mistakenly thought that the job ‘required conversion of measured units to specification units by long division of decimals.’ b.

Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v. Ross

222 F. Supp. 292 · District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 27, 1963

Thus the Maryland Legislature has clearly recognized the right of one suffering damages to proceed against the fund in a disclaimer situation. … He did not appear at the hearing held in this case to establish the facts although he was notified in advance of such hearing.

Valle v. Pressman

229 Md. 591 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 5, 1962

the continuance of the incumbency, he ceases to be qualified. … The doctrine of de facto officers is, of course, well established in this State. See Reed v. President (and Town Commissioners) of North Fast, 226 Md. 229 , 172 A. 2d 536 (1961), and cases therein cited.

Tarer

District Court, D. Maryland · Aug 18, 2026

immunity. … - 15 2017), however, the Fourth Circuit specifically held that it is clearly established that “retaliating against an inmate who filed a prison grievance [is] unlawful

Dize v. Ass'n of Maryland Pilots

205 Md. App. 176 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · May 31, 2012

as a Jones Act seaman and ... clearly, he’s way beyond the 30 percent which is a rule of thumb and not a bright line as the Association argues. … Dize failed to ''establish!] the existence of a material dispute of fact as to whether the vessel was in navigation at the time of the injury.” Mr.

In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 2633 in Circuit Court for Washington County

101 Md. App. 274 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 2, 1994

Rebecca Hegar, a qualified foster care expert, testified that an attachment among the R. children, if broken, would lead to a “lifelong sense” of “loss” for the siblings. … Gregory Powell, testified that, based on the previous bonding that occurred between Tiffany and the Mauk family, a parental reattachment with them could be easily re-established.

Kusi v. State

438 Md. 362 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 19, 2014

In particular, I do not believe that an “abuse of discretion” standard need be overlaid on the “clearly erroneous” standard that the Court also applies. … The relevant statute and rule require the appointment of an interpreter for a defendant in specified circumstances. 1 In particular, the relevant statute provides, in pertinent part: (a) The court shall appoint a qualified

General Motors Corp. v. Bark

79 Md. App. 68 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Mar 31, 1989

Let it be unmistakably clear, however, that this does not remotely suggest that we think Judge DeWaters was wrong, let alone clearly wrong. … The qualifying language only takes on significance when it is the claimant who has prevailed before the Commission and the defendant/insurer who appeals to the circuit court.

Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes

229 Md. 406 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Sep 25, 1962

Mary’s County was established in 1634 contemporaneous with the establishment of the proprietary government, probably on the model of the English shire, associated with the important office of sheriff. 1 Scharf, supra, p. … Indeed, Kent County had been established by Claiborne before the landing of the Marylanders and he established New Kent County in Virginia after he was ousted from Maryland vi et armis by the Calverts.

Bergmann v. Board of Regents of University System

167 Md. App. 237 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Feb 23, 2006

. *266 Decisions regarding whether individual students qualify for the lower in-state tuition rate are made by the Board via policies and procedures established by the Board. 15 Through this process, UM determines domicile … The Court of Appeals in Frankel , in the context of discussing UM’s asserted waiver and sovereign immunity defenses, held that Mr.

North American Specialty Insurance v. Boston Medical Group

170 Md. App. 128 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 8, 2006

The second check, in the amount of $375.00, does not identify clearly the claim to which it relates. … These checks do not establish that the amount claimed in the instant action arose within the limitations period.

Heger v. Heger

184 Md. App. 83 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Feb 3, 2009

Heger’s counsel established that Ms. Heger did not provide figures to the IRS on her income tax returns that were consistent with her testimony. Based upon the entirety of the evidence, the Court has established Ms. … of whether the motion nonetheless qualified under one or both of the exceptions to the filing deadline under subsection (b) or subsection (d).

Howell v. State

3 Gill 14 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 15, 1845

We are very clearly of opinion, that the counsel are mistaken in the view thus presented by them of the object and nature of the license. … This is the reasoning, and such are doctrines of a court, whose decisions on questions of constitutional law, are to be received as conclusive, and we think, they clearly establish the validity of the Maryland statute.

Kirsch v. Prince George's County

331 Md. 89 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 25, 1993

Bernalillo County Assessor, 472 U.S. 612 , 105 S.Ct. 2862 , 86 L.Ed.2d 487 (1985), a qualified Vietnam veteran and his wife who established residency in New Mexico in 1981 *101 applied for a tax exemption in 1983 under a … Such a result would be clearly impermissible.” Id. at 64 , 102 S.Ct. at 2315 , 72 L.Ed.2d at 680 . B.

Addison v. Lochearn Nursing Home, LLC

411 Md. 251 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 10, 2009

See Bowen, 410 Md. at 297 , 978 A.2d at 684-85 (stating that “claimed immunity from an adverse judgment would clearly be reviewable on appeal from a final judgment”); See also Bloch v. … which of its citizens qualify for this form of medical insurance and which services its program will provide.

Doe v. DeWees

District Court, D. Maryland · Mar 23, 2020

Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … that the relevant Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.

Mitchell v. Montgomery County

88 Md. App. 542 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Oct 2, 1991

Both of these witnesses were properly qualified as experts. … Clearly, Merryman was not, as proffered by the County and asserted on appeal, solely a "fact witness to describe this road."

Curtis v. State

4 Md. App. 499 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 2, 1968

But when this cause for disqualification, established by judicial decision, was removed by legislative enactment, the ground for the inquiry was no longer existent. … We construe Art. 51, § 8A according to the ordinary and natural import of its language, there being no different meaning clearly indicated by the context.

Elms v. Renewal by Anderson

439 Md. 381 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 21, 2014

In this case, the facts, as established before the Commission, demonstrated Renewal’s exercise of control over Elms. … The language of that subsection clearly states that “[a] principal contractor is not liable to pay compensation to an individual under this title if the individual . . .