Case law

Harmon, D., Aplt. v. UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2019

Thus, the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that the Board’s preferred definition of the word “during” was entitled to deference unless it is “clearly erroneous.” See Harmon v. Unemployment Comp. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 159 (2000))). [J-62-2018] [MO: Dougherty, J.] - 3 21, 23; see Chamberlain v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 114 A.3d 385, 395 (Pa. 2015).

Cheever v. Brown & Brown

30 Ga. 904 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jun 15, 1860

Brown, the plaintiff, it is true, stated, under oath, that the corn was delivered to Cheever. But he was then upon his examination before the Court, and not testifying before the jury. … nothing of the character and condition of the books themselves, not a witness swears that he kept correct books, from his own knowledge of his dealings; nor does any one depose that he knew of any dealings between Cheever and Brown

Domenico Calcaterra v. Iowa Board of Medicine

Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 22, 2021

In Doe v. … Carolan v. Hill, 553 N.W.2d 882, 886 (Iowa 1996) (“Without 3The Board cites to earlier language in Portz v.

Knight v. Superior Court

26 Cal. Rptr. 3d 687 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 4, 2005

(Hernandez v. … (Hodges v.

United States v. Pinson

1 F. App'x 426 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 12, 2001

United States v. Crossley, 224 F.3d 847, 855 (6th Cir.2000) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)). … United States v. Carr, 5 F.3d 986, 993 (6th Cir. 1993). Facts upon which the court relies at sentencing must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence. United States v. Walton, 908 F.2d 1289,1300 (6th Cir.1990).

Gentiva Health Services, Inc. v. Becerra

31 F.4th 766 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 15, 2022

To  14 the extent the Board’s decision is based “on the [text] of the Medicare Act itself, [the court] owe[s] deference [to the Board] under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. … Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defs. of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644, 666 (2007) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132–33 (2000)).

Brown v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 25, 1999

Batson v. Batson, 769 S.W.2d 849, 859 (Tenn.App. 1988). A litigant is not necessarily entitled to a share of each item of marital property. Brown v. … Brown.

Domenico Calcaterra v. Iowa Board of Medicine

Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 22, 2021

In Doe v. … Carolan v. Hill, 553 N.W.2d 882, 886 (Iowa 1996) (“Without 3The Board cites to earlier language in Portz v.

Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Johnson

117 A.D.3d 1506 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 2, 2014

Russell v. Tennessee Department of Correction

99 F. App'x 575 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 16, 2004

Dellis v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 257 F.3d 508 , 511 (6th Cir.2001); Lillard v. Shelby County Bd. of Educ., 76 F.3d 716 , 726-27 (6th Cir.1996); Morgan v. Church’s Fried Chicken, 829 F.2d 10, 12 (6th Cir.1987); Chapman v. … Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a); Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989); Clark v. Nat’l Travelers Life Ins. Co., 518 F.2d 1167, 1169 (6th Cir.1975).

Marriage of Brown v. Brown

310 So. 2d 461 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 7, 1975

Preserve Our Cody Neighborhoods, an unincorporated association; Terry and Diana Skinner; Dan and Konnie Haman; Patrick and Lynn Pitet; Sheila and Doug Peterson; Becky Stern; Siri and Tom Blake; Carla Egelhoff; Peggy Rohrbach; Brandi and Ty Nelson; Sarah Mcclure; and Chuck and Celeste Radtke v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a Utah corporation sole and City of Cody Planning, Zoning and Adjustment Board

2025 WY 64 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Jun 13, 2025

See Rosenberger v. … See, e.g., Goodman v.

Tonique Griffin v. City of East Orange (074937)

225 N.J. 400 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 22, 2016

State v. Brown, 170 N.J. 138, 147 (2001) (quoting State v. Marrero, 148 N.J. 469, 484 (1997)). … Lockley v.

Neal v. Coe

35 Iowa 407 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 11, 1872

The plaintiff boarded at the hotel with the defendants, and knew that they were repairing the premises in controversy for a home. … Elston & Green v. Robertson, 23 Iowa, 208 ; Christy v. Dyer, 14 id. 438; Cole v. Gill, id. 527; Williams v. Swetland, 10 id. 51; Charless & Blow v. Lamberson, 1 id. 435.

State v. Jones

11 Fla. L. Weekly 67 · Supreme Court of Florida · Feb 20, 1986

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); Prouse, 440 U.S. at 656-57 , 99 S.Ct. at 1397-98 ; Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. at 555 , 96 S.Ct. at 3081 ; Terry v. … Brown, 443 U.S. at 50-51 , 99 S.Ct. at 2640-2641 ; State v. Superior Court In & For County of Pima, 143 Ariz. 45 , 691 P.2d 1073 (1984); State v.

Nathan Brown v. Lynette Brown

Michigan Supreme Court · May 21, 2014

BROWN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 148553 … BROWN, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 10, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered,

Robertson v. Evans

400 So. 2d 1214 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1981

In McLean v. … Unlike McLean v.

Brown v. Brown

135 So. 3d 311 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 5, 2012

.); O’Connor v. O’Connor, 447 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), receded from on other grounds by Thomas v. Thomas, 724 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Thomas v. First Federal Sav. Bank of Indiana

653 F. Supp. 1330 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 6, 1987

As such, First Federal is subject to the constitution and laws of the United States and to all rules, regulations and orders issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“Bank Board”). … The remarks of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board regarding the Board’s regulations and policies in making loans, cited by the court in Laufman , are instructive on this point.

Brown v. Brown

277 Ga. 594 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 16, 2003

Delbello v. Bilyeu, 274 Ga. 776, 777 ( 560 SE2d 3 ) (2002). The probate court also found that the will was improperly executed because Bobby Brown’s purported signature was in the wrong place on the will. … Miles v. Bryant, 277 Ga. 362 ( 589 SE2d 86 ) (2003). This error does not affect the probate court’s conclusion that the will is invalid because the purported signature of the testator is a forgery. Johnson v.