Case law

Dietz v. Ramuda

130 Or. App. 397 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 5, 1994

See McGarrah v. SAIF, 296 Or 145 , 675 P2d 159 (1983); Dethlefs v. Hyster Co., 295 Or 298 , 667 P2d 487 (1983); Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Spurgeon, 109 Or App 566 , 820 P2d 851 (1991), rev den 313 Or 210 (1992). … The Board did not err in upholding SAIF’s denial. Affirmed. 1 Under Mathel v. Josephine County, 319 Or 235 , 875 P2d 455 (1994), it would appear that this claim constitutes an injury.

Bernard v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

21 Or. App. 44 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 7, 1975

Plaintiff presses upon us in support of his argument Semler v. Oregon Dental Examiners, 148 Or 50 , 34 P2d 311 (1934), aff'd 294 US 608 , 55 S Ct 570 , 79 L Ed 1086 (1935). … (f# # # # * *47 “* * * Laughney v. Maybury, 145 Wash. 146 ( 259 P. 17 , 54 A.L.R. 393 ), is in keeping with onr views * * *.

Bushnell v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

116 Or. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 25, 1992

She relies solely on State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434 , 806 P2d 130 , rev dismissed 312 Or 76 , 815 P2d 701 (1991), in which we held that the phrase “scheme or network” is unconstitutionally vague. … Even assuming that the constitutional void-for-vagueness principle is applicable to the Board’s rules, 2 compare Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 299 , 605 P2d 273 (1980), with Williams v.

Westlake Homeowners Ass'n v. Clackamas County Board of County Commissioners

11 Or. Tax 108 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 7, 1988

Plaintiffs petition to the Board of County Commissioners requested exemption under ORS 307.115. … Hess v. Seeger, 55 Or App 746, 760 , 641 P2d 23 (1982). Plaintiff has neither pled nor proved the necessary elements. Plaintiff failed to use the statutes which provided remedies to it at various points in the process.

McKenzie v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

115 Or. App. 707 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 1992

At the outset, the Board argues that the order is not a final order, because it does not change the 12-month term of supervision imposed on petitioner’s 1989 convictions. It relies on Willaby v. … Howard v. State Board of Parole, 105 Or App 288, 292 , 804 P2d 509 , rev den 311 Or 432 (1991). The Board imposed, a 12-month parole term in response to a parole violation.

Pulito v. Or. State Bd. of Nursing

365 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 2019

Crandon Capital Partners v. Shelk

219 Or. App. 16 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 26, 2008

Plaintiffs, Crandon Capital Partners (Crandon) and Rae Ann Brown (Brown), owned shares of Willamette. “In November 2000, Weyerhaeuser offered to purchase all of Willamette’s outstanding shares for $48 per share. … Kahn v.

Koblinski v. Or. State Bd. of Nursing

364 Or. 849 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 2019

Good Samaritan Hospital v. Stoddard

126 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 19, 1994

When an agreement is unambiguous, its interpretation is as a matter of law, Timberline Equip, v. St. Paul Fire and Mar. … See Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Seney, 124 Or App 450, 454 , 863 P2d 528 (1993).

Springfield Firefighters' Ass'n v. Public Employes' Retirement Board

93 Or. App. 134 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 14, 1988

Fire/Police Retire. v. … See also Salem Fire Fighters Local 314 v.

Dixon v. Or. State Bd. of Nursing

364 Or. 207 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2018

Penrod v. Cupp

283 Or. 21 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1978

In this respect, we agree with the view of the New York Court of Appeals *25 in People ex rel Brown v. … Brown’s petition alleged that prison personnel had confiscated a number of his books.

Koblinski v. Or. State Bd. of Nursing

295 Or. App. 669 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 9, 2019

Wakkila v. City of Portland Civil Service Board

66 Or. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 1983

The scope of the Board’s power is delineated by Chapter IV of the City of Portland Charter. “A city’s charter is, in effect, the city constitution.” Portland Police Assn v. … in Drake v.

George v. Myers

169 Or. App. 472 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 30, 2000

Jackson asked plaintiff to move the boards. … German v.

Nolan v. Or. State Bd. of Nursing

295 Or. App. 789 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 24, 2019

Whitmire v. Oregon State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

21 Or. App. 139 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1975

Hickam v. Morgan, 9 Or App 25 , 495 P2d 1243 (1972). … Sanitary Authority v. Pac. Meat Co., supra. See also, Miller v. Medical Board, 33 Or 5 , 52 P 763 (1898). Affirmed.

Rhodes v. Oregon State Veterinary Medicine Examining Board

190 Or. 77 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1950

Upon defendant’s return to the writ, consisting of Exhibits “A” to “D,” inclusive, embracing the Veterinary Board’s proceedings of revocation, the lower court reversed the Board’s order, hence, this appeal. *79 The Board’ … There is nothing in the aforementioned language which would sustain the Board’s contention that the plaintiff appeared at such hearing personally or by his attorney. The case of State v.

Gordon v. State Mortuary & Cemetery Bd.

363 Or. 600 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 17, 2018

Committee of One Thousand to Re-Elect State Senator Walt Brown v. Eivers

61 Or. App. 107 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 1982

Defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground, among others, that the only evidence established that the allegedly false statements were with regard to Brown, not to plaintiff committee. … Although we are not bound by dictum in Supreme Court cases, the following quotation from a footnote in Comm, to Retain Judge Tanzer v.