Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.45s

  • KLB Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    700 F.3d 551 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 4, 2012

    But prompted by a series of Seventh Circuit decisions, the Board changed course. See, e.g., NLRB v. Harvstone Manufacturing Corp., 785 F.2d 570 (7th Cir.1986). … Graphic Communications International Union v. NLRB, 977 F.2d 1168 , 1169 (7th Cir.1992). We addressed the Board’s Nielsen standard in ConAgra, Inc. v. NLRB, 117 F.3d 1435 (D.C.Cir.1997).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sharp v. Department of Veteran Affairs, Board of Appeals

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 2025

    Sharp in administrative proceedings before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. See Compl., at 1, 5, Sharp v. American Legion, 2023-CAB-005322 (D.C. Super. Ct. Aug. 21, 2023). … The second sought $8,500 for the Board’s failure to comply with the subpoena. See Sharp v. Dep’t of Veteran Affs., Bd. of Appeals, No. 24-cv-1345 (D.D.C), Compl., Dkt. 1-1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    497 F.2d 608 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 1973

    In National Airlines v. CAB, 129 U.S. … In Braniff Airways v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ervin Szewczuga and Gerald Treichel v. National Labor Relations Board, Miller Brewing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

    686 F.2d 962 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 17, 1982

    Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. NLRB, 319 U.S. 533, 540 , 63 S.Ct. 1214, 1218 , 87 L.Ed. 1568 (1943). We find no reason to disturb the Board’s order. V. … NLRB v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Southern Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    664 F.3d 946 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 2012

    The Board assesses all of these factors “from the perspective of the employees involved.” Cmty. Hosps. of Cent. Cal. v. NLRB, 335 F.3d 1079, 1083 (D.C. Cir. 2003). … We, however, owe great deference to the Board’s selection of bargaining units, and the Board “need only select an appropriate unit, not the most appropriate unit.” Dean Transp., Inc. v. NLRB, 551 F.3d 1055, 1063 (D.C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    181 F.2d 515 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 27, 1949

    We think the case at bar is governed by the doctrine of Yankee Network v. Federal Communications Comm’n, 7 Federal Communications Comm’n v. Sanders Radio Station, 8 Alton R. v. … United States, 9 and Pan American Airways Co. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Randy Brown v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (ORDER)

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 2019

    See, e.g., Bridges v. … .”); Bradshaw v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Service Corp. International v. National Labor Relations Board

    495 F.3d 681 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 27, 2007

    , Salaried, Mach. & Furniture Workers v. … When making decisions about representation elections, the Board is entitled to “a wide degree of discretion,” NLRB v. A.J.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Scott v. United States

    259 A.2d 353 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1969

    bus had traveled a block a young man boarded the bus; that appellant got upset when the boy got on the bus and told him to “ 'go get his gang now’ that he got something for them * * Appellant was carrying a knife in a brown … Bruce v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 336, 339 , 379 F.2d 113, 116 (1967); Smith v. United States, D.C.App., 235 A.2d 574, 575 (1967).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • John Doe Corporation v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2025

    Analysis This is not the first time a plaintiff has sought to proceed pseudonymously in this type of suit against the Board. In fact, in Doe v. … See Bird v. Barr, 2019 WL 2870234, at *5 (D.D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davies v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

    596 A.2d 992 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1991

    See Citizens Against Legalized Gambling v. … Gollin v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • De Azcarate v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    388 A.2d 1233 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1978

    [Palmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 287 A.2d 535, 541 (1972). See Daniel v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 329 A.2d 773, 775 (1974); Salsbery v. … See Salsbery v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 357 A.2d 402, 404 (1976); A.L.W., Inc. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Evergreen America Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

    362 F.3d 827 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 2004

    Seattle Opera v. NLRB, 292 F.3d 757, 761 (D.C. Cir. 2002); see also NLRB v. Hearst Publ’ns, 322 U.S. 111, 131 (1944). As the Supreme Court noted in NLRB v. … In NLRB v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re Rigas

    9 A.3d 494 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 2010

    In re Delaney, 697 A.2d 1212, 1214 (D.C.1997) (quotation marks omitted); see also In re Brown, 851 A.2d 1278, 1279 (D.C.2004) (per curiam) (same). 1 We therefore accept the Board’s Report and Recommendation approving the … See, e.g., In re Belardi, 891 A.2d 224, 224 (D.C.2006) (one-year suspension for pleading guilty to three counts of making false statements to a government agency); In re Brown, 851 A.2d 1278, 1279 (D.C.2004) (one-year suspension

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bannum, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    894 A.2d 423 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 2006

    E.g., Watergate West, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 815 A.2d 762, 765 (D.C.2003); Draude v. District of Columbia Board of *429 Zoning Adjustment, 582 A.2d 949, 953 (D.C.1990). … Beins v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 572 A.2d 122, 126 (D.C.1990).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Carson v. Merit Systems Protection Board

    573 F. App'x 4 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 30, 2014

    See Yunus v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 242 F.3d 1367, 1371 (Fed.Cir.2001). … See Reeves v. Dep’t of the Army, 101 M.S.P.R. 337 (2005); Campo v. Dep’t of the Army, 93 M.S.P.R. 1 (2002); Shivaee v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walsh v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

    523 A.2d 562 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1987

    Proulx v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 430 A.2d 34, 35 (D.C.1981); Liberty v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, et al., 410 A.2d 191, 192 (D.C.1979); see D.C. Code § 1-1510 (1981). … Wells v. Police and Firefighter’s Retirement and Relief Board, 459 A.2d 136, 138 (D.C.1983) (en banc); Seabolt v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, 413 A.2d 908, 910-12 (D.C. 1980).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pioneer Hotel, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    182 F.3d 939 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1999

    Board Norman H. … Proof of such motivation is required to establish the Board's prima facie case. See Marshall Durbin Poultry, 39 F.3d at 1315-16; Automobile Salesmen's Union, 711 F.2d at 386. See generally NLRB v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Paralyzed Veterans of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    752 F.2d 694 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1985

    In North Haven Board of Education v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Sibley, 650 F.2d 760, 767 (5th Cir.1981); see also, Wegner, supra note 4. .

    Reversed on other grounds by United States Department of Transportation v. Paralyzed Veterans of America, 477 U.S. 597 (1986)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Arellano v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board

    384 A.2d 29 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 1978

    However, in Lewis v. … Our role terminates with a reversal and remand; it remains for the Board to reapply itself to the case. Stoner v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.