Case law

Cheever v. Brown & Brown

30 Ga. 904 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jun 15, 1860

Brown, the plaintiff, it is true, stated, under oath, that the corn was delivered to Cheever. But he was then upon his examination before the Court, and not testifying before the jury. … nothing of the character and condition of the books themselves, not a witness swears that he kept correct books, from his own knowledge of his dealings; nor does any one depose that he knew of any dealings between Cheever and Brown

Russell v. Tennessee Department of Correction

99 F. App'x 575 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 16, 2004

Dellis v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 257 F.3d 508 , 511 (6th Cir.2001); Lillard v. Shelby County Bd. of Educ., 76 F.3d 716 , 726-27 (6th Cir.1996); Morgan v. Church’s Fried Chicken, 829 F.2d 10, 12 (6th Cir.1987); Chapman v. … Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a); Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989); Clark v. Nat’l Travelers Life Ins. Co., 518 F.2d 1167, 1169 (6th Cir.1975).

State v. Jones

11 Fla. L. Weekly 67 · Supreme Court of Florida · Feb 20, 1986

Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); Prouse, 440 U.S. at 656-57 , 99 S.Ct. at 1397-98 ; Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. at 555 , 96 S.Ct. at 3081 ; Terry v. … Brown, 443 U.S. at 50-51 , 99 S.Ct. at 2640-2641 ; State v. Superior Court In & For County of Pima, 143 Ariz. 45 , 691 P.2d 1073 (1984); State v.

Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. Brown

182 Okla. 243 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1937

Brown h'ad been con- *244 v-icted of a crime involving turpitude and ordered that he be suspended for two years. … Brown was then of good repute and a man of high character. The board trying Dr.

Robertson v. Evans

400 So. 2d 1214 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1981

In McLean v. … Unlike McLean v.

Frank Romeo and Connie Yang v. US Bank National Association

144 So. 3d 585 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 30, 2014

Brown v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 117 So. 3d 823, 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Section 48.031, Florida Statutes (2013), governs service of process. … See Thompson v.

Brown v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 25, 1999

Batson v. Batson, 769 S.W.2d 849, 859 (Tenn.App. 1988). A litigant is not necessarily entitled to a share of each item of marital property. Brown v. … Brown.

Gentiva Health Services, Inc. v. Becerra

31 F.4th 766 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 15, 2022

To  14 the extent the Board’s decision is based “on the [text] of the Medicare Act itself, [the court] owe[s] deference [to the Board] under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. … Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defs. of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644, 666 (2007) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132–33 (2000)).

Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Johnson

117 A.D.3d 1506 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 2, 2014

Flores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

11 Cal. 3d 171 · California Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1974

Co. (1958) 50 Cal.2d 182, 188-189 [ 323 P.2d 753 ]; People v. … Select Base Materials v.

Marriage of Brown v. Brown

310 So. 2d 461 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 7, 1975

Thomas v. First Federal Sav. Bank of Indiana

653 F. Supp. 1330 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 6, 1987

As such, First Federal is subject to the constitution and laws of the United States and to all rules, regulations and orders issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“Bank Board”). … The remarks of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board regarding the Board’s regulations and policies in making loans, cited by the court in Laufman , are instructive on this point.

Nathan Brown v. Lynette Brown

Michigan Supreme Court · May 21, 2014

BROWN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 148553 … BROWN, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 10, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered,

Duley v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

44 Ill. 2d 15 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1969

(Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co. v. Industrial Bd., 284 Ill. 378 , 382 — 3.) Also, this determination is consistent with Moushon v. … (Gaca v. City of Chicago, 411 Ill. 146, 149 .) Gruenwald v.

Brown v. Brown

135 So. 3d 311 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 5, 2012

.); O’Connor v. O’Connor, 447 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), receded from on other grounds by Thomas v. Thomas, 724 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Neal v. Coe

35 Iowa 407 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 11, 1872

The plaintiff boarded at the hotel with the defendants, and knew that they were repairing the premises in controversy for a home. … Elston & Green v. Robertson, 23 Iowa, 208 ; Christy v. Dyer, 14 id. 438; Cole v. Gill, id. 527; Williams v. Swetland, 10 id. 51; Charless & Blow v. Lamberson, 1 id. 435.

Harmon, D., Aplt. v. UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2019

Thus, the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that the Board’s preferred definition of the word “during” was entitled to deference unless it is “clearly erroneous.” See Harmon v. Unemployment Comp. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 159 (2000))). [J-62-2018] [MO: Dougherty, J.] - 3 21, 23; see Chamberlain v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 114 A.3d 385, 395 (Pa. 2015).

State v. O'Neill

140 Ohio App. 3d 48 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2000

However, the case of Baldasar v. … State v.

Brown v. Brown

277 Ga. 594 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 16, 2003

Delbello v. Bilyeu, 274 Ga. 776, 777 ( 560 SE2d 3 ) (2002). The probate court also found that the will was improperly executed because Bobby Brown’s purported signature was in the wrong place on the will. … Miles v. Bryant, 277 Ga. 362 ( 589 SE2d 86 ) (2003). This error does not affect the probate court’s conclusion that the will is invalid because the purported signature of the testator is a forgery. Johnson v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown & Root, Inc.

311 F.2d 447 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jan 4, 1963

Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Brown & Root, Inc., supra. … Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, § 10(e), 29 U.S.C.A., § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Brown & Root, Inc., supra. 1.