Case law

Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Cola

745 F. Supp. 2d 588 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 2010

Brown & Brown and its subsidiaries, including Brown & Brown of Pennsylvania, Inc. (“Brown-PA”) based in Pennsylvania, and Grinspec, Inc. … Donsco, Inc. v.

United States v. Juan Castellanos Muratella

956 F.3d 541 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 15, 2020

See United States v. Brown, 638 F.3d 816, 818–19 (8th Cir. 2011). We are not free to do so. See Owsley v. … Castellanos attempts to avoid this conclusion by arguing that Brown is no longer binding on this court after the Supreme Court decided Mathis v.

Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & Parole

491 Pa. 549 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1980

Board of Com’r. of Potter County v. Turner, 33 Pa.Cmwlth. 639 , 382 A.2d 1248 (1978). … A proceeding in mandamus is available to compel the Board of Probation and Parole to conduct a hearing or correct a mistake in applying the law. Davis v. Pa. Bd. of Parole, 484 Pa. 157 , 398 A.2d 992 (1979); Moore v.

State ex rel. Stine v. Brown County Board of Elections

101 Ohio St. 3d 252 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 20, 2004

Higgins v. … Clinard v. Greene Cty.

Brown v. Brown

124 So. 3d 424 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 25, 2013

Brown, the former wife, appeals a final judgment which modifies a previously entered judgment of dissolution. Because there was no showing of a substantial and material change in circumstances, we reverse. … See Henderson v. Henderson, 537 So.2d 125, 127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Smoak v. Smoak, 658 So.2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Sidman v. Marino, 46 So.3d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Brown v. Brown

541 F. Supp. 688 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Jun 22, 1982

Brown and Ursel Bartley “on behalf of” Lottie Brown. Lee W. … Tree Top v. Smith, 577 F.2d 519, 521 (9th Cir. 1978). In the present context, the issue revolves around the visitation and custody of Lottie Brown.

Brown v. Brown by Beacham

244 Va. 319 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Sep 18, 1992

However, citing Green and Suttle v. Massie, 62 Va. (21 Gratt.) 356 (1871), and Stuart’s Heirs v. … Workers Pension Fund v.

Ann Marie Gilmore, Michael Paul Rotan, and Harry Don Rotan v. Arvel Dean Rotan and Gary Wayne Rotan

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · Sep 20, 2018

Shell Oil Co. v. Ross, 356 S.W.3d 924, 929–30 (Tex. 2011) (first quoting Computer Assocs., 918 S.W.2d at 455; then quoting Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Horwood, 58 S.W.3d 732, 734 (Tex. 2001)). … Yates v.

Katherine Brown v. Jim Brown

Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Oct 5, 2021

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-00416-COA KATHERINE BROWN APPELLANT v. … In Brown v. Thomas, 757 So. 2d 1091 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000), Brown sued Thomas in chancery court for specific performance on a contract they had whereby Thomas would purchase an apartment building from Brown.

Kearse v. State

605 So. 2d 534 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 17, 1992

Brown v. Wainwright, 665 F.2d 607, 610-11 (5th Cir.1982). Waiver may appear if it is reasonably shown that the defendant has abandoned an initial request for self-representation. *538 Id. See also Myles v. … v.

Brown v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 30, 1999

Defendant/Appellee John Brown (“Husband”) and Plaintiff/Appellant Wanda Brown (“Wife”) separated in October 1996 after twenty-five years of marriage. … See Hanover v. Hanover, 775 S.W.2d 612, 617 (Tenn.App. 1989); Ford v. Ford, 952 S.W.2d 824, 827 (Tenn.App. 1997).

Brown v. Brown

4 Vet. App. 307 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 2, 1993

Brown, appeals a decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) which denied a total disability rating based on individual unemploy-ability. … On April 19, 1991, the Board determined that appellant’s service-connected disabilities did not preclude him from obtaining substantial employment. Mitchell C. Brown, BVA 90-44977 (Apr. 19, 1991).

Brown v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 28, 1999

Only one child, Timothy Brown, age 15, was a minor at the time of the divorce. … Brown make it unlikely she can be rehabilitated to improve her earning capacity to a level commensurate with that of Mr. Brown.” The evidence does not preponderate again st this finding. T.R.A.P.

State ex rel. U-Haul Co. v. Zakaib

232 W. Va. 432 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 26, 2013

Syl. pt. 10, Brown v. Genesis Healthcare Corp., 228 W.Va. 646 , 724 S.E.2d 250 (2011) (“Brown I ”), overruled on other grounds by Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. … Brown, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1201 , 182 L.Ed.2d 42 (2012) (per curiam).

Flores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

11 Cal. 3d 171 · California Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1974

Co. (1958) 50 Cal.2d 182, 188-189 [ 323 P.2d 753 ]; People v. … Select Base Materials v.

State v. Wright

416 S.C. 353 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Apr 27, 2016

State v. Brown, 401 S.C. 82, 87 , 736 S.E.2d 263, 265 (2012). LAW/ANALYSIS I. … V.

Harmon, D., Aplt. v. UCBR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2019

Thus, the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that the Board’s preferred definition of the word “during” was entitled to deference unless it is “clearly erroneous.” See Harmon v. Unemployment Comp. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 159 (2000))). [J-62-2018] [MO: Dougherty, J.] - 3 21, 23; see Chamberlain v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 114 A.3d 385, 395 (Pa. 2015).

Succession of Brown v. Brown

69 So. 3d 1211 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 2011

Brown is inequitable and constitutes an abuse of discretion. Haas v. Romero, 07-974 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/20/08) , 977 So.2d 196 , writ denied, 08-650 (La.6/6/08), 983 So.2d 917 . … Middleton v. City of Natchitoches, 06-1531 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/4/07) , 954 So.2d 356 .

Yates v. Township of McKean

593 Pa. 436 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2007

Cheever v. Brown & Brown

30 Ga. 904 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jun 15, 1860

Brown, the plaintiff, it is true, stated, under oath, that the corn was delivered to Cheever. But he was then upon his examination before the Court, and not testifying before the jury. … nothing of the character and condition of the books themselves, not a witness swears that he kept correct books, from his own knowledge of his dealings; nor does any one depose that he knew of any dealings between Cheever and Brown